@seonatia Most founders should probably spend more time getting mentioned on Reddit, YouTube, and review platforms than submitting to another directory site.
@Oblivious9021 Multi-cloud sounds great until you realize you’re now operating two clouds instead of one.
The operational complexity can become a bigger risk than the outage you’re trying to avoid.
Spent the week testing what makes AI engines cite a page.
One thing surprised me:
Schema markup seems to matter a lot more for Grok and Perplexity than it does for ChatGPT or Gemini.
Which means there probably isn’t a universal “AI SEO” checklist.
The signals that earn citations depend on which model you’re trying to influence.
Exactly. Traffic from AI is becoming easier to attribute over time.
But understanding why a brand is cited in the first place still feels like the bigger challenge. Citation visibility exists before the click, and I think the industry is still very early in understanding and measuring it.
@bloggersarvesh@MasculineEgo_ We’re entering a weird phase where creating content is almost free, but earning citations and mentions is becoming the scarce resource.
@Oblivious9021 Most teams look at cost per token. I’d start with cost per successful task.
Once you measure that, you quickly find a lot of prompts are carrying unnecessary context and duplicate retrieval data.
@glenngabe@kmadhavan77 We’ve been talking about AI visibility, but measurement has always been the missing piece. Intents + Topics + Citation Share seems much more actionable than raw citation counts alone.
Curious to see how teams start using this data to guide content strategy.
@vidyamadhavan2 I actually know a few people who use Perplexity daily, but you’re right - nobody talks about it the way they talk about ChatGPT.
Feels like a distribution problem more than a product problem.