New, on "The Seafarer" (an Old English poetry classic), with comments on Ezra Pound's translation, the poem's meaning, the Christian transformation of the Aryan ideal of undying fame, and MORE!
It's interesting how the prequels are now going through this moment of critical revisionism. I saw Phantom Menace when I was like 13 and found it godawful. It was proof that George Lucas is not, in fact, a creative genius but merely a guy who stumbled upon a viable concept.
its so funny how the star wars prequels are obviously cinematic masterpieces, but a bunch of chungus gen X nerds who never amounted to anything convinced us they were bad because they didnt make them feel like empire strikes back did when they were 10
@freedream2402 I am talking about my classmates at school, dude. If anything, the older people were more relaxed about Star Wars and were like, "Ah, it was some alright family fun!" You must be young.
These lists would be better if they just excluded other genres besides rock. They have the 2nd Miles quintet as #4, and while it's nice to see them get a shout-out, it's like... ok, why not put Coltrane's quartet in there. Or Duke Ellington's orchestra, while we're at it.
The 100 Best Bands of All Time
Over the last two years, CONSEQUENCE has surveyed more than 200 artists and musicians to rank the greatest individual performers in modern music history, from vocalists and guitarists to bassists and drummers.
Now, we've enlisted more than 70 artists, including 16 Grammy winners and multiple Rock and Roll Hall of Famers, to help us tackle our biggest ranking yet: The 100 Best Bands of All Time.
https://t.co/Ly7htexyoy
@TownTattle Star Wars has always been marketed to children and teenage boys, its fanbase is heavily male-leaning, and the main reason it has cross-generational appeal is because the boys to whom it was marketed grew up and continued to watch the later installments.
@SW_Fan10000@EyeDeeNumbers That's how Lucas later decided to market it, but when Star Wars first came out, it didn't have "Episode IV" in the title card. It was just a movie called "Star Wars." He has continually re-conceived it as the franchise has evolved.
@king_baffled@EyeDeeNumbers Yeah, I suppose that's true. The action scenes were more deliberately paced, though. I mostly remember the prequel-trilogy having a bunch of fighting scenes with very choreographed martial arts sequences, whereas the first trilogy used the action parts to actually tell the story.
@EyeDeeNumbers Well, they probably watched the prequels first because the series is set up so that they run as episodes 1, 2, and 3. So if you're like 13 in the year 2020 or whatever, you're thinking "OK, that's just the beginning of the story as it was always intended."
@EyeDeeNumbers Yes. I think that many of the younger people might have seen the second trilogy before the first, so they never really accepted the idea that Star Wars succeeded because of its more deliberately paced storytelling. To them, the first trilogy is simply primitive.
@DOssuary I think that's what it is, yeah. Plus, they really were what happens when you let George Lucas do whatever he wants, as he had more control over the 2nd trilogy than the 1st. But it's wild how people are so dead-set on wanting to believe in Star Wars hype in the first place.