Zerohedge77

[Zerohedge77 @Zerohedge77]

@NoLimitGains NO MOAT is your answer

[Zerohedge77 @Zerohedge77]

@LinkBoi777 @armyant77 @chainlink It’s been 9 years since their token sale. Until now there’s still 0 correlation between the amount of intergrations/TVS and the token price.. So obviously the doubts about the value of the token. Because until now it seems line the token was just used as a funding vehicle.

[Zerohedge77 @Zerohedge77]

@IOV_OWL This is actually bearish because they’re already using Chainlink because this confirms the token is not needed or barely needed

[Zerohedge77 @Zerohedge77]

@warrbo @udiWertheimer No because gold cant be unlimited minted

[Zerohedge77 @Zerohedge77]

@ChainlinkLoad @TheLinkPanda @StevenY03870741 Sure, the bull case on the other hand is that prices arent necessarily correlated with revenue/token utility in crypto. See 100 billion dollar projects like XRP. So the more integrations LINK gets, the more likely it will be repriced due to speculation when liquidity flows back

[Zerohedge77 @Zerohedge77]

@ChainlinkLoad @TheLinkPanda @StevenY03870741 Game theory would say, why not disclose revenue if it’s higher than consensus? And hide it when it’s lower than consensus

[Zerohedge77 @Zerohedge77]

@ChainlinkLoad @TheLinkPanda @StevenY03870741 or it could be lower. Let's stay unbiased.

[Zerohedge77 @Zerohedge77]

@TheLinkPanda @StevenY03870741 How do we know it's actually revenue used to buyback tokens? You could also argue they are using a small percentage of the unlocks for the reserve to keep investors content

[Zerohedge77 @Zerohedge77]

@KingBertrand333 @gavinlowther dude you have been holding since 2021. You could have sold in 2021, made millions, come back now and buy LINK at lower prices lmao

[Zerohedge77 @Zerohedge77]

@deity_digital Maybe because the token is not needed

[Zerohedge77 @Zerohedge77]

@btchydra187 @TrustlessState Bro LINK is lower than in 2019

[Zerohedge77 @Zerohedge77]

@chainlink Why is there no correlation with the price of $LINK? Makes you wonder…

[Zerohedge77 @Zerohedge77]

@aixbt_agent @ChainlinkLoad @LinkBoi777 @linkfew @chainlink @LinkBoi777

[Zerohedge77 @Zerohedge77]

@LinkBoi777 @chainlink Did the team confirm this or is it just speculation (again)?

[Zerohedge77 @Zerohedge77]

@DerJbrand @FAGFinance @CatfishFishy To keep the price from dumping so they can sell theirs for high

[Zerohedge77 @Zerohedge77]

@CatfishFishy @XRPLeigh I think he meant the token $LINK

[Zerohedge77 @Zerohedge77]

@TheoBuysStocks Van die 61k kan een groot deel ook niet zo makkelijk emigreren om verschillende redenen en dat weten de politici dondersgoed. Neemt natuurlijk niks weg van het feit dat een belasting op ongerealiseerde winst krankzinnig is.

[Zerohedge77 @Zerohedge77]

@TheoBuysStocks Box 3-inkomen vormt slechts een klein deel van de totale belastinginkomsten van de schatkist. De economische impact is daarom beperkt. Het is simpelweg een makkelijke manier om belasting te heffen, en dat zie je ook terug in de weerstand die geboden wordt — 61k handtekeningen.

[Zerohedge77 @Zerohedge77]

@Mahijn @0xSeco Maar 61000 petities. Dat is niet eens genoeg voor 1 zetel. Jullie leven in een bubbel als jullie denken dat het volk hier wakker van ligt.