Instant classic from @tylercowen here.
My reaction: AI is far more likely to make the smart, much smarter and the lazy, much more lazy than it is abundantly clear what happens to the median. Fairly confident that average goes way up though... The floor is fixed, but the ceiling is boundless?
We collectively just need to raise the bar on what we "should be" accomplishing alongside AI ex-ante.
TLDR: 1) as a brand (especially a market leading brand), take your eye off the ball in wholesale at your own peril
2) if you’re going to compete in the b2c retail value chain, you ultimately want to be the AMZN in the room
Conclusion: if you can't be or beat AMZN, be the b2b wholesale version of it. Priors confirmed, back to work.
@danhockenmaier@AcquiredFM “Deterioration happening too slowly to be able to measure in a conventional way” — aka the boiling frog problem.
Can’t say I love the metaphor, but it hammers home the point in terms of what is on the line…
Hamilton Helmer (@hamiltonhelmer) is the author of 7 Powers: The Foundations of Business Strategy, which outlines a framework for identifying and developing sustainable competitive advantage. It’s widely considered to be the most important book on business strategy. Folks like @patrickc@peterthiel@reedhastings@eldsjal and @jeffiel credit the book and Hamilton’s teachers for helping them build their companies.
In our conversation, we discuss:
🔸 When to start thinking about power
🔸 Which sources of power to prioritize
🔸 The difference between moats and power
🔸 Common misconceptions among companies about the types of power they possess
🔸 How power relates to strategy
🔸 How ICs can leverage insights about power in their work
🔸 AI’s impact on competitive advantages and barriers to entry
🔸 Much more
Listen now 👇
- YouTube: https://t.co/4S0G8tialo
- Spotify: https://t.co/N0u33i8LdO
- Apple: https://t.co/DLsoJVkM4K
Some key takeaways:
1. The 7 sources of power:
a. Brand: Your unique brand identity attracts and retains a significant number of customers.
b. Process power: You can produce something more efficiently than competitors, and the competitors can’t easily copy the method.
c. Cornered resource: You have exclusive access to a vital resource, such as the only rights to a patent.
d. Counter-positioning: Your business model/strategy is so counter to that of incumbents that if they copied you, it would hurt their own business.
e. Scale economies: You can produce something more cheaply than competitors, on a per-unit basis, because of the scale of your operation.
f. Switching costs: Your customers can’t switch to competitors without bearing a significant cost(s).
g. Network economies: Your product or service provides more value because of how many other people are already using it.
2. Power requires both a benefit (e.g. lower cost) and a barrier (e.g. switching costs) that prevents others from imitating or neutralizing that advantage. Beware of common delusions, like overestimating the power of branding, data scale effects, or operational excellence.
3. You should always be thinking about strategy, even before product-market fit. This doesn’t mean writing detailed plans about every element of your business. It means thinking about what your “source of power” could be and how you’ll establish it.
4. Power is at the heart of any good strategy. It’s something that gives you a material advantage over competitors that is impossible for them to mimic. It requires a benefit and a barrier. As Warren Buffett famously said, “I look for economic castles [benefit] protected by unreachable moats [barrier].” It would be pointless having a moat around an insignificant shack. And it would be pointless having a castle with no moat or protection around it.
5. For tech startups, it’s common to move from (c) to (g) in chronological order. They start with counter-positioning in order to survive competition from incumbents with many more resources. Then they unlock cost/price advantages as a result of scaling. Eventually their customers face switching costs because of the way they’ve used and invested in the product. And finally, tech startups can establish network economies with a critical mass of users.
6. The first 3 sources of power are rare for tech companies. The company is usually too young to have built sufficient brand love or uniquely efficient processes, and cornered resources are uncommon unless operating in a highly regulated industry.
7. Network effects refer to the increase in value or utility of a product or service as more people use it. Network economies go further by indicating whether these effects translate into significant financial advantages for the business.
8. Despite macro risks, the entrepreneurial creativity and bias toward action found in the U.S. and places like Silicon Valley remain a vital source of economic advancement. Founders should focus on leveraging their unique strengths and “just do stuff” rather than get paralyzed by over-strategizing.
Recently revisited the latest edition of Poor Charlie's Almanack thanks to @stripepress and a couple passages from Talk II stood out to me in new ways:
These two points connected for me today thanks to @lennysan's latest interview with @hamiltonhelmer, particularly the section of the conversation on A.I. (which is well worth a listen). The analogy to the advent of electricity may be the best I've heard.