zheng bo

analyst for public health,Sichuan Univ.

[zheng bo @zhengbo6]

@fangshimin

[zheng bo @zhengbo6]

Just false blood sampling and bad QC

[zheng bo @zhengbo6]

@fangshimin 德国报告测的尿汞，并且肌酐校正过，代表排泄水平。直接推算汞体内含量欠妥，仁丹质量差异吸收率不好界定。银也超了，仁丹可能性有。

[zheng bo @zhengbo6]

@fangshimin 教育堆积的底层决定的，情绪价值还是够。

[zheng bo @zhengbo6]

@fangshimin 如果实际是锐锋，这个日本研究切短来做，更应该是锐锋

[zheng bo @zhengbo6]

@MicrobiomDigest @fangshimin

[zheng bo @zhengbo6]

FAKE DATA
1. The general procedure for quantification in analytical testing is to make a standard curve(SC) first, and then the signal of the sample is quantified through the standard curve.If the contents of Tl were inputed into SC in Figure 1.the signals WERE negative!!!

[zheng bo @zhengbo6]

3.The graph shown in Figure 2A is also weird, the resolution is 0.9cm steps, the data that should NOT be continuous, but scattered, and the peak of Tl should not be too sharp, but be a flat peak, see Sci Rep. 2017 Jun 13; 7(1): 3426.doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-03660-6

[zheng bo @zhengbo6]

2. The 205Tl/12C signal in Figure 2B is about 0.001-0.020, if the 0.016 signal is inputed into the standard curve y=0.000352x-0.00256, the content obtained is 52727ng/g. The figure 2B are NEVER possible.

[zheng bo @zhengbo6]

@Richvn @Nature Thanks

[zheng bo @zhengbo6]

@Richvn @Nature Yes,numbers

[zheng bo @zhengbo6]

@Raelilblack plan to China?

[zheng bo @zhengbo6]

@dlswaney 2 of 3 LCS is probably not reason by chance,check you sample injected or inject QC

[zheng bo @zhengbo6]

@fangshimin Buy buy buy

[zheng bo @zhengbo6]

@arbona_vicent @wittingmichael1 @BiswapriyaMisra Check the prerun sample,run cleaning column prog.

[zheng bo @zhengbo6]

@fangshimin 比较样本所代表总体分布差异，而非中位数。不过中和抗体只代表部分免疫是共识，而且检测成本太高不适用人群

[zheng bo @zhengbo6]

@heshan197910 骂得可以！

[zheng bo @zhengbo6]

Try FUMI for chromatography