@JDVance In order to "stop this madness" you will need a level of brutality that is at least 1000 times the execution of Nidal Hasan that you told the media you wouldn't watch
Words are cheap and when your resolve was tested, you capitulated to "people" who fantasize about killing you
John Adams in 1776
His arguments against giving women, children, and poor men the right to vote:
"But why exclude Women? You will say, because their delicacy renders them unfit for practice and experience, in the great business of life, and the hardy enterprizes of war, as well as the arduous cares of State. Besides, their attention is so much engaged with the necessary nurture of their children, that nature has made them fittest for domestic cares.
But will not these reasons apply to others? Is it not equally true, that men in general in every society, who are wholly destitute of property, are also too little acquainted with public affairs to form a right judgment, and too dependent upon other men to have a will of their own? If this is a fact, if you give to every man, who has no property, a vote, will you not make a fine encouraging provision for corruption?
There will be no end of it. New claims will arise. Women will demand a vote. Lads from 12 to 21 will think their rights not enough attended to, and every man, who has not a farthing, will demand an equal voice with any other in all acts of State."
Europe is burning at the hands of foreign invaders. Top Men in America bloviate about the dangers of Christian Nationalism. Useless scoundrels. The sooner we are rid of their influence the better.
>''Out with the white man!''
>white people move out to build their own town all by themselves
>it becomes the best town
>''NO NOT LIKE THAT! YOU HAVE TO LET US IN!''
Entire ideology buildt on contempt and jealousy
This is brainrot caused by the musical.
Alexander Hamilton was born a British subject to a British father on British land.
He was by no means an immigrant and the other Founding Fathers did not view him as a foreigner.
Napoleon's invasion of Russia seems like ancient history to most people. 1812. Over 200 years ago. Who cares?
The Rothschilds care. Their family was there. Financing multiple sides. Building the fortune that still exists today.
The Russo-Japanese war? 1904. Also feels distant. Regular people barely remember it happened.
Jacob Schiff remembers. Or rather, his descendants do. He financed Japan's war against Russia. His family still operates in the same banking circles he built.
Here's what regular people don't understand: these families have portraits lining their halls going back centuries. They walk past their ancestors every day. They know exactly what those ancestors did. Which wars they funded. Which governments they influenced. What deals were struck in 1815, 1905, 1945.
You and I don't know what our great-great-grandfather did for a living. Maybe he fought in a war. Maybe he farmed. Records are lost. Names forgotten after a few generations.
These families could tell you what their ancestor ate for lunch in 1823 if they wanted to look it up. Because that record exists. In their archives. In their libraries. In their family histories passed down through generations.
Why does this matter?
Because when you're making decisions today based on investments your family made 150 years ago, history isn't ancient. It's active. It's current. It's still paying dividends.
Those walls weren't built with honest labor. They were built with war profits. Lending to both sides. Financing revolutions. Backing the winner before the battle even started.
Regular people think in terms of their own lifetime. Maybe their parents' lifetime if they're lucky.
These families think in centuries. Plan in generations. Operate on timelines that outlast governments.
That's not conspiracy. That's just how dynastic wealth works. And why thinking 200 years is "too long ago to matter" is exactly what they want you to believe.
Thanks for reading until the end. Share if you liked it.
The most revealing part is not the open borders. It’s that it must be done because we “owe it to the world.” Even the pretense this is for our interests has been abandoned.
But he’s not American, why would he care?
Pro-life is not an ideology, it's opposition to abortion
Abortion is bad because it violates God's will and kills an innocent child
Capital punishment is good because God wills it and it punishes the murder of an innocent
The 27-34 year old man “struck out” as a matter of public policy. There’s nothing fascinating about it.
Public policy dictates that he must lose, so he lost.
It's funny we actually liked Vivek 4 years ago. I remember everyone on FrogTwitter supporting him when he was a Trump surrogate in the debates. We were all joking about how hot his wife was, what a Chad he was, his wife was a throat specialist. We didn't know anything about Indians and we just blindly assumed these guys were cool. How innocent! How naive... Vivek and Indians burned their credibility during the past 2 years. An all-time generational fumble.