Scott Z

[Scott Z @zman709]

@Bandmom11 @JoJoFromJerz @HowardMortman You watched a video clip where multiple people were either wearing jackets or some type of vest and at least one person had an open umbrella, and your big takeaway was that trump wore a jacket too?

[Scott Z @zman709]

@pangas_vgc @Timcast It took me all of 5 sec to find out everything you just said on Google by searching the criminal code from his screenshot. At this point you’re either too stupid to understand this stuff or you’re purposely trying not to.

[Scott Z @zman709]

@pangas_vgc @Timcast You don't seem to understand how state laws work. He gives you West Virginia code 61-10-4, and you're still demanding a name to a law. Whether Tim is right or wrong here is one issue, but you don't even have a basic understanding of any of this.

[Scott Z @zman709]

@PhilWMagness @MoronDoctor_ @jstephencarter You’re telling me that I’m wrong that the screenshot you posted didn’t say what it plainly says? You’re really starting to make me wonder if Daniel Kuehn is less insane than I thought he was.

[Scott Z @zman709]

@PhilWMagness @MoronDoctor_ @jstephencarter That says nothing they can do overnight to stop tariffs, not nothing they can do ever to stop them.

[Scott Z @zman709]

@RitaHis @stevemur @Kate_Kelly_Esq You should read the text of the proposed amendment. It contained a self-imposed 7-year deadline for ratification. It was neither ratified within that deadline nor the supposed 3-year extension.

[Scott Z @zman709]

@libertysafeinc Do you send the FBI a code to get into it as soon as it’s purchased to save time?

[Scott Z @zman709]

@Elliottw2Ts @RobGouveiaEsq @BadLegalTakes How is this a bad legal take?

[Scott Z @zman709]

@LeftSideStrong5 @NewDogWhoDis @democracyinper1 @Liz_Wheeler There’s no interpretation. It’s like a reading comprehension test. There’s only one way to read it correctly. But I agree, this isn’t getting us anywhere, so have a good day.

[Scott Z @zman709]

@LeftSideStrong5 @NewDogWhoDis @democracyinper1 @Liz_Wheeler No it wasn’t. That’s a statement not a question. The question was above that and was asking about his statement of hatred and violence on “both sides”. You seem to want the sides to be white nationalist and everyone else. Those aren’t the sides he’s referring to.

[Scott Z @zman709]

@LeftSideStrong5 @NewDogWhoDis @democracyinper1 @Liz_Wheeler And he was referring to the two groups that day in his response. Pro/anti statue. In your mind, if the klan shows up to a pro/anti restaurant rally, are the two groups somehow shifted to klan and non-klan? Or does one group just have klan members among it?

[Scott Z @zman709]

@LeftSideStrong5 @NewDogWhoDis @democracyinper1 @Liz_Wheeler If he’s saying those people are merely a subgroup to a larger group, how is that then the entire group? There are plenty of things to dislike Trump on. You don’t have to go making up fake reasons.

[Scott Z @zman709]

@LeftSideStrong5 @NewDogWhoDis @democracyinper1 @Liz_Wheeler Guy clearly says A. For political reasons, you want him to have said B. The transcript you just posted literally says what I just said above. Unless you’re prepared to argue that no person could be opposed to the removal of the statue without being a white nationalist. Are you?

[Scott Z @zman709]

@LeftSideStrong5 @NewDogWhoDis @democracyinper1 @Liz_Wheeler Because, and I can’t believe I’m even having to explain this, the two groups were what he was speaking about. In next breath after saying there were very fine people, he said there were people there just to protest the removal of the statue. Do you not even know what was said?

[Scott Z @zman709]

@LeftSideStrong5 @NewDogWhoDis @democracyinper1 @Liz_Wheeler I know you want that to be the case, but it’s not. The two groups were those for and against statue removal. Are you suggesting that everyone who was against removing the statue, for whatever reason, believes in the inherent genetic superiority of whites?

[Scott Z @zman709]

@LeftSideStrong5 @NewDogWhoDis @democracyinper1 @Liz_Wheeler That has some relevance to who the two groups being referred to were?

[Scott Z @zman709]

@LeftSideStrong5 @NewDogWhoDis @democracyinper1 @Liz_Wheeler The two groups were those who wanted the statue removed, park renamed, etc. and those who didn't. Each side had its various constituents. That bad elements may have been present on both sides doesn't mean that you can reduce everything to that.

[Scott Z @zman709]

@LeftSideStrong5 @NewDogWhoDis @democracyinper1 @Liz_Wheeler You have to have a Ph.D to get this stupid. Unless you’re trolling, then bravo.