Brandenburg test: when speech cannot be free...
The speech is “directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action,” AND
The speech is “likely to incite or produce such action.”
@johnpavlovitz She is a very confused man, pretending to be a woman. She identifies with men more than women. She is fluid gender and doesn’t even know it.
@B52Malmet Van de Veen, stumbled by saying politicians should have 'higher standards' then he corrected himself by saying 'have higher protection'...this is key...they are subject to both. The standards have gone out of the window.
@smerconish don't ever insult Trump by saying he didn't know what he was doing. He is proud still and feels like we all deserve this, its his way of punishing everyone for voting against him.
@smerconish he told them it will be "wild". that means lawless, crazy, out of control...he knew who he was talking too, he said "you know who you are" it was the Trump Army which he built and commanded....
@jaketapper @A_COOPER_CNN @wolfblitzer the nubb of this is what the defence called HIGHER PROTECTIONS & HIGHER STANDARDS. the senate is there to ensue both. this is the choice. Both must be applied.
@RepRaskin you have got him. higher protection for POTUS also means highest standards. that is the nubb. Trump lowered the standard required of a president of USA!
got him......higher protections = higher standards. we need the highest protection and highest standard for POTUS.
Trump fell so short of the highest standard...this is the nubb of it. Presidents need to be held accountable..they are not the man in the street....