@ValkStrategy Wasn’t the reason it was canceled the immaturity of the AI and lack of communication means to maintain man-on-the-loop when it goes deep in the enemy territory? Today we have starlink/PWSA so keeping the man-on-the-loop shouldn’t be a problem and the AI got better as well?
@Etienne_Marcuz Was there any targeting data sharing between the fighter and the SAMP/T battery? Theoretically, if the cruise missile was flying low fighter could achieve lock-on from greater distance?
@DefensaCom@BaturrilloSUB STOBAR carrier + Rafale M with 30% range penalty like India earlier or the CATOBAR carrier + naval version of the FCAS later? Or forget fighters altogether and develop carrier + drones for penetration and targeting + ship launched cruise and ballistic missiles for strikes?