I already didn't trust the police. I haven't trusted them for a long time. Even then, I could have never expected the British police to be this evil across the entire country.
Hampshire Police violently arrest 15-year-old girl in Southampton for running away from foster care.
The girl's father has sent us images of the girl whose face is now covered in cuts and bruises after the police ground her head into the floor.
These officers are thugs.
@MrKnight2205@Landeur group of people who all want to have sex with the same kind of person from all over the world?
They have no ties to one another, nothing that makes them want to look out for or care for one another and most will never know each other. That's not a community. A cult at best.
@MrKnight2205@Landeur Very interesting take, particularly from a self-proclaimed Christian.
This is a very reasonable question. What makes the "Gay community" an actual community? Community used to be the people in your local area who all knew and supported one another. Now a community is just a
All because it made them feel good, too.
It's hard to shake off that programming as well, but we need to also make sure that future generations don't get indoctrinated into it and to deprogram as many people as possible.
The reason White people are being crushed and replaced in their own countries is because they’re the only ones who went colour blind.
That has to end very quickly if we are to survive.
Look after each other, folks.
The reason White people are being crushed and replaced in their own countries is because they’re the only ones who went colour blind.
That has to end very quickly if we are to survive.
Look after each other, folks.
Correct.
Politicians had no problem with ethnic and sectarian politics when it was everyone else doing it.
As soon as White people start it becomes a problem.
Fine, identity politics it is.
Whilst Euli is wrong on almost everything he is right about this.
After Ben Habib collapsed his party it was made clear that there is no senior/official role for him in Restore Britain.
Since then Ben and his team have been as provocative as possible before turning up to canvass on the 13th because they want someone to call him a slur or start something.
He will then try and leverage this incident to strongarm Restore Britain into giving him a position or to bring the party down as revenge.
Get these people the fuck away from my party
Multiculturalism means embracing every other culture over the West’s.
Under the guise of “inclusion,” it acts as a Trojan horse that delivers the total erasure of Western culture in practice.
Every person and organization promoting it is an enemy of the West.
@UKwantsmore@Steve_Laws_ So you think Reform is a hard right party?
The party that has Zia Yusef, Nadhim Zahawi, Nadeen Dorries and many more, even going so far as to get Labour activists who said they don't even change their minds about their liberal beliefs, they're just going to do it in teal?
A blessing and curse of video streaming is that we see every atrocity perpetrated against our people.
The world has seen the pallor of Henry Nowak’s lifeless hands, forced into handcuffs. Heard the police dismiss his laboured breaths and pleas for an ambulance with “I don’t think you have [been stabbed] mate.” Watched him read his hypothetical rights as his life ebbed away, because his killer’s family recited the magic word "racist".
With visual media, the superficial characteristics of the victim and perpetrator become obvious.
The victim is one of ours; the perpetrator, one of theirs; the agents of the state side with them against us. The gap between their propaganda and the reality ready-to-hand to refute it grows with each new horror.
The internet is a pattern-recognition amplification tool — which is why it has been so heavily censored, and why a brief lifting of that yoke of censorship by Musk’s purchase of X has prompted apoplectic rage among the international bureaucratic class.
Nothing breaks the illusion of the blank slate, the dream that all peoples can peacefully coexist, like a constant supply of footage of atrocities committed by the regime’s victim class against their scapegoats.
The conclusion most will draw is that the British state will be indifferent to your suffering if you are white, and prioritise the face-saving indignation of violent tribal minorities.
That their son or daughter could be the next Henry Nowak or Iryna Zarutska.
That the state will treat your children’s preventable deaths at the hands of one of their beloved minorities as an inconvenience.
Extrapolating from demographic trends between 2007 - 2026, my children, due in October, will be minorities among their own generation as early as 2031.
Their non-white peers have been taught that we are responsible for their civilisations’ failure to launch; that we perpetrated genocidal atrocities against their people; that our relative wealth is their plundered birthright.
Encouraged to nurse these revenge fantasies, they will not be so generous to our children when they are the only white child in the classroom, as we were when it was the other way around.
If we don't do something, any of our children could share Henry's fate.
Today on Substack:
@TheNewsAgents@maitlis@jonsopel The hypocrisy on the left is really off the charts
You have absolutley no shame do you
You know you are an embarrassment to Western Civilization
@TheNewsAgents@maitlis@jonsopel It could've been one of my friends, family or just any other of my countrymen. Someone that even you know or love.
This senseless act of violence has hopefully woken up many of those who were a-political and as such, we're taking our country back.
@TheNewsAgents@maitlis@jonsopel Even if we ignore the clear hypocrisy between the reaction to Henry Nowak and George Floyd, this is bigger than just Henry and that's why you're so scared.
It could've been anyone that night. It just happened to be Henry. But it could've been me. It could've been my sister.
I called this well over a decade ago now... back even when I still tried to write like an academic!
https://t.co/CTxqDIMhiR
The Inequalities of Equality
November 14, 2013 10:38 am
Introduction:
In this article, I will endeavour to describe the key principles of equality. Moreover, I will demonstrate to the reader the foreseeable and consequential, flaws and discrepancies that exist within this ideology.
What is equality?
To begin I would like to analyse several words that are key to defining the ideology of equality.
The definitions below are as viewable in Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English.
Equality: A situation in which people have the same rights, advantages etcetera.
Equal: Someone who has the same rights and opportunities as you do.
Discrimination: To treat a person or group differently from another in an unfair way.
The law:
Equality in the United Kingdom is enforced by an Act of Parliament.
Equality Act 2010 – “It is against the law to discriminate against anyone because of: […]” The Act goes on to list numerous social groups that may be victimised by discrimination. (https://t.co/HWRGyCxD3D: 2013).
Therefore, it can be noted that the key principles of equality are: The same rights, advantages and opportunities for everyone; it is illegal in the UK, not to comply with this ideology.
Who can benefit from equality?
The Equality Act 2010, clearly states the following groups and situations should be exempt from discrimination, by law:
[…]
Age
Being or becoming a transsexual person
Being married or in a civil partnership
Being pregnant or having a child
Disability
Race including colour, nationality, ethnic or national origin
Religion, belief or lack of religion/belief
Sex
Sexual orientation
[…]
At work
In education
As a consumer
When using public services
When buying or renting property
As a member or guest of a private club or association
(https://t.co/HWRGyCxD3D: 2013).
Why is there a “Who can benefit from” in equality? Should equality not automatically benefit everyone?
By our earlier definitions alone, it is clear that the ideology of equality does not support a selection process in which, who, where and when can be defined. Equality, by definition, must, and can only be, applicable to everyone, everywhere, at all times.
By stating that certain groups cannot be discriminated against, there is instantly inequality. By attempting to define the characteristics of where and who equality applies to, the result will shift the balance that is equality and produce inequality; equality must remain equal.
Equality does not exist in a state other than equally neutral; to state that it can manifest and prioritise certain groups is an absurd notion.
Furthermore, not only do obvious flaws exist within the ideology of equality, there are numerous troubling discrepancies that are prevalent within the current equality system being enforced under UK statute law.
Moreover, when the phrases “ * ’s rights” (where “ * ” can represent any number of social groups protected by law from discrimination) are used and perceived as a by-product of equality, there is a major flaw in the system. Equality states that equal rights must be the acceptable norm; there is no option for specific group rights.
Equality states that everyone, everywhere, at all times is equal and must be treated as such.
By nominating groups to have rights, equality has been neglected in favour of inequality, yet, flying a flag of equality in an attempt to persuade unsuspecting citizens into confusing the facts.
If rights are assigned to a specific social group, the remaining population that does not fall under that social group are neglected of those rights, therefore, select social groups with their own specific rights, is by definition, discrimination against everyone else and unacceptable under the ideology that is prevalent within equality.
Increasingly, rights are being assigned to various social groups with complete disregard for the definition of equality. Likewise, over a period of time, social groups will become accustomed to associating their specific social group rights, with a sense of rightful superiority and begin if not continue to take advantage of it.
Due to the nature of statute law and the repercussions of breaking it, very few people if any actively protest against group specific rights, however, supporting these groups by actively promoting equal rights for everyone (including the current population of “right-less” people) will help to dissolve group specific rights and reform as a truly equal, unanimous coherent identity.
To summarise:
Equality can be defined as – where everyone is equal
The current equality model as enforced by the Equality Act 2010, serves as a driving-force for an inequality-rife society.
Group specific rights can be viewed as supporting inequality over equality.
An ideal solution would be to nullify group specific rights and replace with a truly equal rights based system.
https://t.co/F5wips1O8w