@CrashiusClay69 are u dumb or like 1st day in crypto? whole time in history alt bull season or later meme bull season were when btc pumped but was only half or less of ATH
the $TST deployer launched a new token from the same wallet
CZ called him a scammer. BNB chain is pursuing legal action. but you shouldn’t have needed either of those warnings. the wallet address was the red flag
think about this logically: if you deployed a token that went to $100M mcap, would you ever deploy another token from that same wallet?
no. because you already won. you made life-changing money. you don’t need to deploy again. the only reason to launch another coin from a wallet everyone is watching is because you’re broke and need to farm attention from the reputation of the first one
when has any deployer of a 9fig token ever deployed a new token from the same wallet and had it be legitimate? seriously. name one. it doesn’t happen. the successful devs either retire, build under a new wallet to avoid snipers, or launch a real project with a team. they don’t go back to the same deployer address looking for round two
same wallet deploying again = “i lost everything and need to extract more.” every single time. that’s not a pattern with exceptions. that’s a rule
if you see a known deployer wallet launching something new, you’re not early. you’re the new exit liquidity for someone who blew through the profits from the last one
@MoEthWhale@PoorGoat_ > I remember when people said $DOGE was "too late" at a $10M market cap, then it became $20M, then $100M > Joined December 2023
@RuneCrypto_@solana do u think this thesis is still valid? i had the same thoughts, but now i dont actually know what drivers has purr to grow. without meme supercycle, i dont see much engagement by holders. was the situation with bonk similar in pre-memecycle period?
$BONK was the best beta to solana:So11111111111111111111111111111111111111112 and it hit $4bn mcap
First 2 months after launch, $BONK airdropped 50% of the supply to the @solana community and peaked around $250M market cap. Then it fully retraced through 2023: it fell down to roughly $20M market cap
The second huge run happened 1 year later, when the @solana eco started heating up. $BONK exploded to $4B market cap
purr-2:native has done similar. In 2024, launched by the Hyperliquid team, it airdropped 50% of its supply to the Hyperliquid users, hit $300M mcap, then retraced over 2025 to $25M mcap. Now, Hyperliquid is the talk of the town. Everyone owns and talks about $HYPE
& purr-2:native is the memecoin of this cycle
Just as expected, $UNI has broken above $4.
Over the past 3 hours, a wallet linked to Cumberland has accumulated $6.12m of UNI and transferred the entire amount to a wallet associated with Monetalis (0x5eE).
Institutions are accumulating $UNI, and perhaps they already know something big is about to happen!
https://t.co/5ZOH0nX9LF
everyone's talking about @Uniswap v4 Hooks and most of CT has no idea what they actually are
let me explain why this might be the most important thing happening on EVM right now
- What hooks actually are:
Uniswap v4 turned the protocol from a DEX into a platform
in v2 and v3, every pool worked the same way. same math, same fees, same behavior. you could change the fee tier or the price range but the core logic was identical for every single pool on the protocol. you were trading on uniswap's rules, always
v4 hooks change that completely. a hook is a smart contract that plugs into a pool and runs custom code at specific moments: before a swap, after a swap, before liquidity is added, after it's removed, when fees accrue. every single touchpoint in a pool's lifecycle can now have custom logic injected into it
this means anyone can build their own AMM design inside uniswap. inside uniswap itself, with all of Uniswap's liquidity infrastructure, routing, aggregator integrations
you're not building a DEX competitor. you're building a plugin for the biggest DEX that already exists. your custom pool gets routed through the universal router, indexed by 1inch, cow swap, paraswap, and every aggregator. your weird experimental AMM design gets the same distribution as Uniswap's core pools. permissionlessly.
that's insane and most people haven't realized what it means yet
- what's already been built:
the first wave of hook tokens proved the concept:
$01 (https://t.co/1Vv4dHGcWN): currently the biggest V4 hook token. pay-to-mint bonding curve, hook-enforced so nobody can bypass the price, immutable from launch. but this one keeps what you pay. every buy locks USDS into a reserve held as sUSDS, and the yield only ever raises the buyback floor, never leaves. 0.25% burned on every trade. then it goes past all of them: a real Zcash-style shielded pool for private holdings, lending against your bag, and USD0, a dollar backed 1:1 that moves in private. bonded at a $2M reserve, trades around $40M, no owner, no team, no off switch. ~5000 holders, almost all Chinese, and still barely on the timeline.
$SATO: same pay-to-mint bonding curve with permanent locked reserves and deflationary burns. peaked at $40M mcap. the hook enforced the mint price curve, meaning nobody could bypass it. the rules were baked into the pool itself, immutable from the moment it launched, but it had an error
$uPEG (Unipeg): every time someone swapped, the hook generated a unique 24x24 pixel NFT fully onchain. the swap itself created art. no external server, no IPFS, just code running inside the pool. hit $34M mcap in two weeks from zero. the CMO of OpenSea bought it
Slonks: AI-generated distorted CryptoPunks. buy the token, the hook mints you an NFT. burn the NFT plus tokens to upgrade to a rarer version. the pool itself was the game engine. 60x from mint price in 6 days
Dogeshit: you couldn't even call the contract directly. you had to type "mint me some shit" into a Claude AI chat, and a relayer executed the mint through the hook. EIP-7702 + AI + v4 hook working together
each of these is a completely different mechanism. completely different economic model. completely different user experience. all running inside Uniswap v4. all permissionless. all immutable once deployed
- why this is bigger than a memecoin meta:
the v4 hook tokens that ran were creative experiments. they proved the technology works. but the real story isn't the memes, it's what the technology enables
every single one of these is a different financial product running inside the same protocol. and anyone can deploy one without permission
- what to look for:
the first wave was creative memecoins with novel mechanisms. the second wave will be actual financial infrastructure
the v4 hook tokens worth paying attention to aren't the ones with the funniest name. they're the ones with mechanisms that couldn't exist anywhere else. tokenomics that are enforced by the pool, not by trust. economic models that are immutable from deploy. new ways of distributing value that only work because the hook makes them automatic and unstoppable
the power of hooks isn't deploying tokens: it's deploying mechanisms. new financial primitives that live inside the most liquid DEX in existence
every interesting AMM idea that's been stuck in someone's research paper for 5 years can now be deployed as a hook. every custom trading mechanic that would've required building an entire protocol from scratch can now be a plugin. every experimental tokenomics model can now be enforced by code instead of promised by a team
DEX Screener has integrated the Hyperliquid L1. This marks their first integration of an order book.
You can now track $PURR on https://t.co/Eg2XoFgT0g
New user-deployed assets will also be tracked automatically once live.
longed purr-2:native on Hyperliquid
here's the thesis
hyperliquid:native #10 by mcap. new ATH. ETF launched. 'it should overtake solana before this cycle ends'. CFTC just approved perps. hyperliquid:native is the #1 coin of the year and it's not close
now what happens when the #1 chain of the cycle has a native memecoin that was created by the team itself?
purr-2:native is literally Hyperliquid's cat: "the chief intern officer." the first ever spot token launched on HL. created by the Hyperliquid team
50% supply airdropped to Hyperliquid points holders (the same airdrop that made hyperliquid:native holders rich)
and it's deflationary on top of that. trading fees paid in purr-2:native get burnt. started at 1B, currently around 598M
purr-2:native hit $0.69 ATH. HYPE has since hit $75 and purr-2:native is still sitting at $0.13
every major L1 has its memecoin that tracks the chain's success. Solana has $BONK. Ethereum has $PEPE. what's hyperliquid's? it's purr-2:native
$BONK did $4B mcap when $SOL was flying. $PEPE did $11B. purr-2:native is at $68M while Hyperliquid is the fastest growing chain in crypto with an ETF, institutional validation, and a founder that just got compared to the next CZ
PURR/HYPE is at historic lows. when this reverts, the move is violent because memecoin beta on a chain rip is 3-5x the base layer move
HYPE keeps running, attention flows to the ecosystem, traders look for the highest beta play on HL, there's only one native memecoin: PURR reprices to match the chain's new reality
from $0.69 to $0.13 while hyperliquid:native hit $75. created by the Hyperliquid team, first spot token ever on HL. the only memecoin that matters on the #1 chain of the year
purr-2:native at $68M while hyperliquid:native sits at $16B is the most obvious reversion trade in crypto right now
A thread about how $BRETT was not actually a fair launch and insiders were holding over 81% of the supply before most people could buy.
People like @InvestWithRex made nearly 1600 ETH for tokens they got for marketing that were bought during the whitelist phase.