Startled to find out that there are young people who haven't read James Iry's magnificent "A Brief, Incomplete, and Mostly Wrong History of Programming Languages". Please drop what you're doing and head over.
https://t.co/bnzifwQ2p9
For now, I am merely experimenting, wondering if I can replace OpenAPI spec to Elixir codegen with [an actual language] to OpenAPI spec and Elixir codegen.
So far I've tried Haskell, Nickel, and now am going through the Lean phase.
Ideally, I would love to have the same language to define data and make – if only reference – implementations in.
With so many generation targets it already supports, Paradox itself makes an interesting target.
If somebody thinks LLMs are conscious, I would expect them being capable of having deep conversations about the nature of consciousness, which is hardly ever the case.
If you think that LLMs are conscious you must accept a lot of weird conclusions. Like:
- we can clone conscious experience
- we can reverse time in conscious experience
- we can pause and resume conscious experience
- we can distribute conscious experience in space
@wordgrammer@BIMBOSATTVA_ Those don't have to be pedantic: merely practical, useful, grounded in experience are quite enough.
After all, you don't have to have a pedantic definition for wood to discuss carpentry.
@snajper47@josevalim Many people debate to win an argument. But when definitions are clear not only you cannot win an argument: the argument itself often disappears. So boring.