A blockchain can be very decentralized while the smart contract or app remains centralized. You are the one who is going to be responsible on to interact with your assets or not. If not make your own contracts and let people use it.
For example, a contract governed by a single owner key is fundamentally centralized, and that centralization is proven if the contract is found to contain bugs.
Regarding the Bybit hack. This wasn’t by the design of Ethereum itself but was caused by UI manipulation and blind signing by a few operators, hence centralization.
Also, Ethereum has never “rolled back” its chain. The DAO incident was resolved via an irregular state transition (hard fork), not by reverting or erasing blocks. Calling it a rollback shows a lack of care about how destructive it actually is.
@blockchainjames@TrustlessState I really see people justifying memecoins for personal reasons or indirect influence on their bags.
Example:
Solana only revenue is from memecoins
Memecoins allow some sort of laundering
@cryptovlat@llamaonthebrink@MikeIppolito_ A good dapp concept is any interface using another project's contracts, for example: swap on defillama + uniswap contracts.
@binji_x It is far fairer than CEX where you can’t see anything. The only problem you think it is bad right now is because of very low liquidity and fees for AMMs.
@Marczeller They are not just models. I even expect Fable to have some RAG structure before it gives out anything.
In that case, they share the same resource regardless of Fable, Opus or Sonnet.
That is also you see why some outputs are very AI and stale.
1/2 KaiSign MCP: reduce blind signing risk for agent-made on-chain transactions.
We tested agent transaction payload generation with frontier models, including Opus 4.8 and Sonnet 4.6.
Even at that level, agents can still produce generic function selectors that do not exist.
Traders should take more slippage or pay more fees on volatile pair swaps.
IMO they even need to do so on less volatile pairs in exchange for a better rate in the future.
Protocols even like Uniswap has no initiative to just make the fastest blockchains as main exchanges, that should replace CEX entirely.
@gabe_onchain The problem that you said is not actually impermanent loss but LVR (Loss versus rebalancing).
All trades happen on CEX and low volume on DEX, hence AMMs are unprofitable.
Traders should take more slippage or pay more fees on volatile pair swaps.
IMO they even need to do so on less volatile pairs in exchange for a better rate in the future.
Protocols even like Uniswap has no initiative to just make the fastest blockchains as main exchanges, that should replace CEX entirely.