If you’re an indie dev studio, please stay in your lane. I know there’s a button you can press now to make your game infinitely faster and cheaper and better and more optimized and feed your family and employees in a fraction of the time it would by hand but that button is only for AAA.
See you in 5 years on release day.
You should be happy that creative people can make games that you enjoy faster and easier than ever before. Instead, you blast them on social media with your posse of moronic freakshow basement dwellers who’ve never written a line of code in their life and try to ruin their livelihood for trying to make their lives better.
They are buying the game not the development process. This is how software is created now, sorry! It should not affect you if a line of code was written by hand or not, except in the sense that it got to your steam library faster and likely better than it would have before.
This is a silly hill to die on, you are likely to never play a new game or use new software ever again that wasn’t at least partially touched by AI. Times are changing. It’s a good thing.
@otainul AAA studios don’t care if some furries on twitter don’t approve of how they make their games. Normal people still play.
Indie studios get review bombed and blasted by you freaks and their game dies.
These are not the same.
@SleepyGalaxBun@noe_beats@alkaline_dreams@BadVertexDev I can tell you’ve never really programmed a day in your life or you’re <20 years old because any programmer who lived through the stackoverflow era knows how god awful of an experience it was posting questions on coding forums and would never wish to go back to it
@BadVertexDev Nooooo please dont press the fix it now for free button you must spend another month and 100 thousand dollars finding the one line fix to ur niche problem only 8 people in the world have run into before
Can you explain what’s novel or interesting about this? No offense, I just do not understand, it seems obvious to me that if you show an apple instead of a baby to a robot (or any person) they would have no issue stabbing it. Is the idea that they should know it might be a trick? In that case how would you make anything useful ever?
@JustJake@rosnburg@complex_maths Stop being deceptive. the contradiction has nothing to do with your policy change. The contradiction is that you told me yesterday that you explicitly confirmed that primcloud was not the only provider being probed but now you are saying it was
@JustJake You said earlier that you had already confirmed that it was not just a single external provider that was tested in this way..
https://t.co/E47CrS9pc0
@0xChxse@d3m0n_com@sammwy@joshmanders@jakerunzer@Railway@ngeloxyz No reason and in fact confirmed not
And, as mentioned, it will now be officially banned to run any automated testing externally
I personally would have thought this was obvious, but better clear than sorry
That is the model truncating the potential tokens so it doesn’t inevitably end up selecting an absurd token due to random chance though, synthid has nothing to do truncation afaik
And yeah it’s definitely not as effective as distortionary methods but that’s the nature of it, can tweak to make it more or less distortionary to change how accurate it will be