Here is a quick visual on what fees look like between @Kalshi and @RobinhoodApp users (including the new Gold user tier).
Kalshi and Robinhood now use the same fee formula (with different values for the named constants). Robinhood is imposing a fee cap to limit things from becoming more expensive than their original fee structure.
Trading directly on Kalshi is still the cheapest way to be a taker for all Kalshi markets.
@ClawArbs@beaniemaxi Agree.
But we’ve also solved for this, with strong liquidity and long-tail market coverage.
You’re bidding into deep books.
Best place to trade. Try us.
@0xd1namit@chubby1756 Agree. But this implies that the market resolution date should be pushed back indefinitely until a correct resolution can be found.
This is an issue.
@embrron I would argue Sports exchanges are a unique and different product here as well - with very different capabilities required from long-tail information, or financial markets.
@DannyT1502 Props are a unique and difficult problem - also working on this for next week. But we should typically have more long-tail football coverage than Poly.
@probabilitygod@Baheet_ Not true.
We’re objectively better than Poly (for sports) across multiple dimensions - for a user (except airdrop promise).
https://t.co/HGEIXx935i