@Auston_rbx@TyMusee I remember being up double digits at half time and he gave up over a playing time dispute.
He can't pretend he is all about winning.
@robbyyy@JWC7215C@TerribleMaps In Melbourne, if you mention football or footy it is presumed you are talking about Australian football and not association.
@fhjckaka@DraftCasual Brown only had 47 makes all season. You are confusing selectivity with efficiency again.
You are missing the forest from the trees with Okorie.
shooting: otd, high ft% context
playmaking: poor teammates, tov eff.
size: WS, good weight
weak SOS? Weaker teammates
@fhjckaka@DraftCasual Just by adjusting by playtype he is more efficient attacking the rim than Acuff, Flemings and Mikel.
He is right in the middle of the pack for freshmen guards.
@fhjckaka@DraftCasual Raw percentages would make you think Stirtz/Anderson are better rim finishers than Philon.
You have to adjust % by volume and difficulty.
11.6% of his rim attempts being and-1s is good evidence of higher difficulty.
@hellyymarco It wasn't too surprising that Sexton improved his shooting percentages because he was doing a vast majority of the dribble in college. There was other areas that could have advanced but didn't so I am not sure if Sexton reached his high end outcomes.
@hellyymarco Okorie just has a better starting point than Sexton.
Larger, less foul prone and more defensive playmaking.
Rim% is equivalent but it is more unassisted and higher volume.
Advantage creation and lower turnovers gives him a good structure to grow his playmaking.
@TargetGuyJY@AbbasBokhari17 Stanford really didn't suit him.
- no rim threats
- mediocre screening
He still ended up 99th percentile in unassisted rim makes.
Another thing is his turnover aversion suits a team with great rebounding such as Edey, Boozer and Coward.