Big Skinny

Moms love me, Dads fear me

[charred skeever hide @low_dosage]

great article and worth the read

[hawk 2 @compositehelm]

this is like if the rapture was in 3 days and jesus himself posted a demo for a rapture theme song

[Teddy @WarnerTeddy]

i put up a store for some of my open source projects and will soon be able to offer kits cheaper than buying all components individually once i start buying in bulk

[maddie @madsssagascar]

im genuinely intolerant of religion like in a way that even progressives probably think is problematic. you have this made up idea of existence from a story book and you reject the reality of the world around you to the point of hate and violence. while looking stupid as fuck

[Brandy Bryant 🏳️‍⚧️ @InkMasterbator]

They've destroyed so much of the place they had to put up a picture of the Whitehouse in front of the Whitehouse like some Coyote and Roadrunner visual gag.

[liv 🥂 @livvidaloca]

a beautiful woman named National Weather Service keeps hitting my line about ⚠️ TORNADO WARNING

[bald ann dowd @ali_sivi]

yooo we got morning announcements

[Big Skinny @45elocin]

Look at the velocity of this front
#ilwx

[🌙⭐️petalwave~🌙⭐️ @petalwave]

power outage at division blue line

[Bob Waszak @nilwxreports]

The computer tornado probabilities are showing very elevated to high chances for tornadoes across northern Illinois and surrounding areas for Thursday afternoon and evening.

Looking at the latest computer models, we will have an environment extremely favorable for both prefrontal and embedded qlcs tornadoes tomorrow some likely strong and long tracked.

This is in addition to the widespread destructive wind threat associated with the likely intense MCS/squall line that develops.

Storms will be already ongoing at daybreak across western Iowa and those will be the storms to watch as they evolve throughout the morning hours. Expect pretty nasty storms across northern Illinois from west to east starting around 11am-12pm and continuing through the evening hours.

Tomorrow at this moment looks like the real deal for an ideal severe weather setup with very little failure modes. Be prepared and have shelters in place. #ilwx

[Steve ✦ Lowtwait @Lowtwait]

This clip reminds you that the power of animation is creating visual narratives that cannot be done with any other art form.

[oxyzen @oxyzen]

this is what happens when “everyone gets a puppy” finally beats “diarrhea forever”

[Nick Krasznavolgyi @NickKrasz_Wx]

On this day in 2022, I witnessed an incredible spectacle, a tornado developing directly overhead. It touched down about half a mile away, and this 30-second timelapse condenses 14 minutes of footage showing the circulation swirling above me. This was a top moment for me.

[Tony Seruga @TonySeruga]

🇺🇸💥🇮🇱 Congress Just Voted to Fuse the U.S. Military With Israel’s — and Buried It on Page 847 So You Wouldn’t Notice ☠️

Section 224 of the $1.15 Trillion NDAA Doesn’t Fund Israel. It Makes Israel Part of the Pentagon. Forever. No Exit. No Debate. No Vote. 👇

[Tony Seruga @TonySeruga]

🎯 Deep Dive: The Quiet Coup Inside the NDAA

The Responsible Statecraft piece has put its finger on something genuinely significant — and the fact that this is happening inside a must-pass $1.15 trillion defense bill, buried at Section 224, tells you everything about how the permanent national security apparatus operates when it wants to avoid a public fight.

🏗️ What Section 224 Actually Does

This isn’t a tweak. Section 224 — titled the “United States-Israel Defense Technology Cooperation Initiative” — is a structural rewiring of the U.S.-Israel military relationship.

The provision authorizes $150 million annually from FY2027 through FY2029, but the money is almost beside the point. What matters is the architecture it builds:

- Bilateral R&D across AI, quantum computing, autonomous systems, directed energy, cyber, biotech, counter-drone systems, and missile defense

- Co-production and joint ventures with Israeli defense firms on U.S. soil

- Licensing agreements that embed Israeli-origin intellectual property into Pentagon programs of record

- “Network integration” and “data fusion” — which means U.S. military data flowing into Israeli systems and vice versa

- Pathways from R&D straight into procurement, bypassing the normal foreign aid oversight channels

The key phrase in the legislative text: technologies are to be identified for “integration into United States systems and programs of record.” That’s not foreign aid. That’s making Israeli defense tech a backbone of the U.S. military.

🔄 The Strategic Shift: From Aid to Embedded Infrastructure

The Quincy Institute’s Steven Simon has been tracking this for months. His brief, The Disappearing Aid Check, lays out exactly what’s happening — and it’s more sophisticated than most people realize.

The current model: Israel receives Foreign Military Financing (FMF) through the State Department, voted on annually by Congress. It's visible. It's politically accountable. People can argue about it.

The new model: Phase out FMF grants and replace them with Pentagon procurement accounts, industrial partnerships, and sustainment pipelines. Same money, different door — one with vastly less transparency.

The logic, as Simon documents, is being sold under an “America First” framing: this isn’t a handout to Israel, it’s an investment in American military readiness, industrial capacity, and jobs. Israeli co-production facilities in Mississippi and Arkansas become political leverage — members of Congress protect the jobs in their districts, and the relationship becomes structurally impossible to unwind.

This is the same playbook the military-industrial complex always uses: distribute the subcontracts across as many congressional districts as possible so no one dares vote against the program. Now they’re doing it with a foreign country’s defense sector.

🕳️ The Transparency Problem

The shift from State Department-administered FMF to Pentagon procurement is the move that should alarm anyone who cares about accountability.

Under the FMF model:

- Congress votes on the aid package publicly
- The State Department provides human rights certifications
- There’s diplomatic oversight and policy conditionality
- Public debate is possible

Under the Pentagon procurement model:

- Funding moves through budget justification documents and program element descriptions
- Oversight is limited to “cost, readiness, and capability” — bureaucratic criteria
- The relationship gets evaluated like any other weapons program, not as a strategic political commitment
- No diplomatic strings attached

As the Responsible Statecraft piece notes, this would give Israel “a higher level of military-industrial integration than the U.S. has with any other country in the world” — including NATO allies. Not even the Five Eyes partners have this kind of embedded access to U.S. defense procurement.

🧬 The Legislative Genealogy

This didn’t come out of nowhere. H.R. 7540 (Rep. Ronny Jackson, R-TX) and S. 3855 (Sen. Ted Budd, R-NC) were introduced as standalone bills in February 2026 with nearly identical language. When a standalone passage looked difficult, the provisions got folded into the NDAA — the classic maneuver for legislation that can’t survive public scrutiny on its own.

The JINSA (Jewish Institute for National Security of America) influence is unmistakable. Their “Partners in Production” report explicitly recommended deeper industrial integration and the addition of Israel to the U.S. National Technology and Industrial Base (NTIB). The FY2026 NDAA had already directed DoD to establish a working group to assess exactly that. Section 224 is the next logical step — and JINSA’s fingerprints are all over it.

⚠️ Why This Matters More Than the Dollar Figure

$150 million a year is a rounding error in a $1.15 trillion defense bill. But the institutional architecture this creates is permanent.

Once Israeli firms are embedded in U.S. supply chains, once Israeli-origin IP is inside Pentagon programs of record, once U.S. and Israeli military data networks are fused — disentanglement becomes economically and institutionally impossible. You can’t just stop the aid check. You’d have to rip apart procurement programs, break contracts, and rebuild supply chains.

That’s the point. This is designed to make the relationship irreversible — at precisely the moment when a growing number of Americans are questioning unconditional support for Israel’s actions in the region.

The traditional Israel lobby works through campaign contributions and media influence. This is more sophisticated: it works through the defense procurement bureaucracy itself, creating material interests that guarantee political support regardless of public opinion.

🗳️ What Happens Next

The House Armed Services Committee markup is scheduled for June 4, 2026. After that, the bill moves to the full House, then reconciliation with the Senate version.

Section 224 is currently in the base text — meaning it was put there by committee leadership before amendments or broader debate. That’s how the most consequential provisions get through: bury them in the chairman’s mark, count on the must-pass nature of the NDAA, and dare anyone to hold up the entire defense budget over one section.

Members who want to stop this have a narrow window: force a floor amendment to strike Section 224, or demand recorded votes that put colleagues on the record supporting the fusion of U.S. and Israeli militaries. The question is whether anyone has the stomach for that fight when the pro-Israel apparatus in both parties remains largely unchallenged.

The Responsible Statecraft piece is right to flag this. The quiet ones are always the ones that matter most.

[🌽🌽 Erica, The White Trash Socialist 🌽🌽™️ @herosnvrdie69]

They said the rich would leave the US if we raised taxes on them. It turns out if you cut taxes, give tax breaks and let them exploit as many workers as possible they will actually just leave anyway!

[Curiosity @CuriosityonX]

🚨: Erin Brockovich launches a map tracking AI data centers, and she's asking Americans for help

[Devon Hardware’s Wife @thatfrood]

🚨🚨they’re doing it again this year!! 🗣️

[Aurelia ⚢✨ @AuriBlooms]

So are we calling it McCarthyism again or are we naming it after somebody else this time