You should all be incredibly concerned. Are you? The new insane #CGT hike = disaster
Scrap the #CGT changes on Australian businesses now or watch jobs, savings and growth get destroyed. We’re all in it together #StopTheCGT
You literally can’t make this up
RFK Jr said we should be eating real food and focus on things that are good for us, like a high protein diet
Determined to prove RFK Jr wrong, a senior writer at WIRED decided to eat nothing but high protein, but he ate his boyfriend’s protein powder that was Nutter Butter flavored, he also at protein pop-tarts, protein ice cream, protein Starbucks drinks and a bunch of other processed protein junk
He says because of this diet he actually threw up and clearly Robert F Kennedy is giving bad health advice
You would have to think this is some kind of joke, but no….. it’s real
This guy ate literally anything but real food like Robert F Kennedy Jr recommended
Immaculate Constellation author Matthew Brown: “The path forward should be broad in scope, time-bound, and properly sequenced. It should protect those who came forward first, compel those who remain silent to tell the truth, and balance mercy with justice. Above all, it must allow those with knowledge of UAP, NHI, TUO, and the crimes committed in their shadow to speak lawfully, candidly, and without fear.”
In our imperfect perfect world, does the USG have the courage to do what’s humanely right to create the perfect conditions for full Disclosure?
Demand it 🫵🏻
https://t.co/wO13SfYTGY
Almost every argument about energy comes down to one number: energy density.
How much energy is stored per kilogram of fuel or material.
The numbers in MJ/kg:
• Wood: 15
• Coal: 24
• Crude oil: 44
• Natural gas: 54
• Hydrogen (compressed): 120
• Lithium-ion battery: 0.7
• Uranium (fission): 80,000,000
• Hydrogen (fusion): 690,000,000
Read those last two again.
A kilogram of uranium contains more energy than 3,000 tonnes of coal.
A kilogram of hydrogen fusion fuel contains 45 million times more energy than a kilogram of oil.
This is why:
• Batteries struggle to replace liquid fuels in aviation and shipping. Energy density is 60x lower.
• Nuclear submarines can run for 25 years without refuelling.
• Fusion, if cracked, ends energy scarcity permanently – not just for decades, but for the lifetime of the Sun.
The energy transition debate isn't about ideology.
It's about physics.
Every energy source is competing against millions of years of chemistry packed into fossil fuels – and, eventually, against the nucleus itself.
Know the numbers. The debate becomes clearer.
On the island of Roatán, off the coast of Honduras, a company called Próspera runs something the textbooks say cannot exist: a functioning jurisdiction where governance is a service you purchase rather than a burden you inherit at birth.
The mechanism is elegant. You sign an agreement with the platform, pay a flat annual fee (around $260 for Hondurans, $1,300 for foreigners), and in exchange you get a legal system, dispute resolution, and a regulatory menu you actually choose from. Businesses select which country's regulations they want to operate under. A clinic can opt into Arizona medical rules. A builder can pick from a set of international codes rather than wait for a bureaucrat in Tegucigalpa to stamp a form. The contract binds Próspera too, which is the part statists never understand. When the ruler signs the same document as the ruled, arbitrary power gets expensive.
This is Paul Romer's charter city idea stripped of its World Bank chaperone and handed to private capital. Honduras passed the ZEDE law in 2013 under President Juan Orlando Hernández. Próspera opened in 2020. The residents came. The capital came. Then the politics arrived.
President Xiomara Castro's government repealed the ZEDE framework in April 2022, and Honduras now faces Próspera in international arbitration with a claim that reached $10.775 billion, roughly a third of the country's GDP. Consider what that tells you. A nation of nine million people torched a project that promised jobs and foreign investment, then discovered that breaking contracts with people who read contracts carries a price.
The lesson here is old: property rights and legal predictability produce development. They are not luxuries you enjoy after development. Hong Kong under British common law went from fishing rocks to financial capital on exactly this insight, no natural resources required.
Próspera's enemies call it a colonial enclave for the rich. Odd, then, that the cheaper residency tier is reserved for the locals, and that the whole point is letting a poor Honduran opt out of the sclerotic system that kept his grandfather poor.
Governments hate exit. Próspera is exit made legal, priced, and voluntary. Watch which side blinks.
Remember the vicious pile-on against Jacinta Price when she dared to speak the truth: that the Albanese regime was flooding Australia with Indians en masse to rig the electoral map and prop up Labor’s vote?
Well, now even the taxpayer-funded ABC is forced to admit what she said is “self-evident.”
The same hacks who tried to destroy her are now quietly confirming she was right all along. Hypocrites.
This insanity and the Govt funded Building Projects corruption are sending Australia broke. Along with criminals having free rein on drugs/alcohol/cigarettes. Just mind blowing. Every honest Aussie’s standard of living is plummeting, although there won’t be any honest ones left soon. It’s not worth it.
The Government @AlboMP & @JEChalmers needs to wake up. Please retweet. Not a single finance academic at a recent academic business conference supports the #CGT changes. EVERYONE there hates them.
Wake up Australia
Depuis 50 ans, la gauche a réussi le plus grand hold-up intellectuel de l'histoire moderne.
Pas avec des armes. Pas avec des lois. Avec des mots.
Et honnêtement ? Chapeau. C'est génial. C'est diabolique. C'est du grand art.
Ils ont compris une chose qu'Orwell avait écrite noir sur blanc dans 1984 : celui qui contrôle le langage contrôle la pensée. Change les mots, et tu changes ce que les gens sont capables de penser. Rétrécis le vocabulaire, et tu rétrécis le champ du possible.
Dans 1984, ce n'est pas un détail. C'est le cœur du réacteur. Le ministère de la Vérité fabrique les mensonges. Le ministère de l'Amour torture. Le ministère de la Paix fait la guerre. « La guerre c'est la paix, la liberté c'est l'esclavage. » La novlangue ne décrit pas le monde — elle le remplace.
Et c'est exactement ce qui s'est passé. Regardez la mécanique :
Le « progressisme » ? C'est l'anti-progrès. Ceux qui bloquent le nucléaire, qui freinent la tech, qui diabolisent la croissance, qui rêvent de décroissance et veulent punir ceux qui construisent. Le mot dit « avant ». Le projet dit « arrière ».
L'« antiracisme » ? Il a réinjecté la race partout. Il assigne les gens à leur couleur, les enferme dans des cases, dresse les groupes les uns contre les autres. Un mouvement censé effacer la race l'a remise au centre de tout. Il a fabriqué le racisme qu'il prétend combattre.
Les croisades « contre l'homophobie » ? Elles crispent, elles clivent, elles imposent — et fabriquent en retour une partie du rejet qu'elles disaient vouloir éteindre.
La « protection » façon Union européenne ? C'est du flicage. On te surveille « pour ton bien », on te censure « pour te protéger », on te contrôle « pour ta sécurité ». Chaque mot est une inversion. Le vocabulaire de la bienveillance au service d'un projet orwellien.
Et le plus beau dans l'arnaque, c'est le verrou. Le piège parfait.
Aujourd'hui, des millions de gens lucides, qui voient parfaitement le problème… se taisent. Pourquoi ? Parce qu'ils refusent d'être traités de « racistes ». Sauf qu'être « antiraciste » au sens où le mot a été retourné, c'est précisément devenir raciste. Ils ont piégé les gens avec leur propre morale. Échec et mat.
Voilà le chef-d'œuvre : ils n'ont pas eu besoin de vous convaincre. Ils ont juste rendu le désaccord impensable, en confisquant les mots pour le formuler.
Alors oui — respect. Bonne guerre. Ils ont joué une manche, et ils l'ont gagnée.
Mais il y a un truc que la novlangue n'avait pas prévu.
Tout le monde a compris.
Le voile est tombé. Les mots reprennent leur poids. Et une inversion sémantique ne survit pas à l'instant précis où les gens la voient à l'œil nu. Ça, c'est terminé.
On reprend les mots. On reprend le réel. On reprend la partie.
This is because the anti-capitalist left is not actually against people being crazy rich. They're against certain types of people being crazy rich.
Artists and athletes make sense to them because they've played music and sports and because their success can be explained by "luck" and "talent". Messi's wealth is not offensive to them because they understand Messi is much better at football than they are.
But when it comes to business, the anti-capitalist leftist has no framework for understanding why Jeff Bezos might be super rich since 99% of them have never ever created a product, business or service that was of value to other people. They've never taken entrepreneurial risk. They've never employed people and felt the burden of responsibility that comes with that. They've never pick up a business and given it a play in the way they've picked up a ball or a guitar.
They *literally* don't understand wealth creation. They think there is a fixed amount of money and the only thing a business does is split it unfairly.
It's why they rage at Elon and other successful business leaders. Because they genuinely don't understand why they're wealthy.
Also, and this is just as important, athletes and artists are disproportionately young, attractive, "diverse", left wing etc. Business leaders are "evil" middle aged white men whose success offends the average anti-capitalist leftist because they don't understand a) what it is they do and b) that Elon Musk has the same talent advantage on them as Messi does, it's just harder to measure.
UK: A video circulating widely on social media appears to show 3 Black individuals assaulting an intoxicated white man in Birmingham before a female police officer arrests the white man.
Birmingham Police asks not to share this video.
“This is economic vandalism, a war on aspiration.”
“Gaslighting young people”.
Also former NSW Parliamentary Budget Office chief economist @DerekFranc90653 confirmed it that Treasury’s CGT modelling is wrong by 100%.
Page 149 of the Budget assumes one share. Real investors face 50% higher tax. Gaslighting young Australians by @JEChalmers & @AlboMP as Australian understand they will want them gone 🇦🇺