@dklineii Asking "what could I do better?" only works if the person feels safe hearing the answer. People protect their egos because criticism hits their need for significance. Leaders who separate the work from the person's worth get far more people asking.
@officialnath_ Praising zero leave also tells everyone else that rest costs you standing. People skip breaks to protect their certainty, not because the work needs it. A team that runs fine while someone is away is the real sign of a healthy organisation.
@Quentin_W Culture is usually where acquisitions quietly fail. A merger shakes people's certainty first: who do I report to, is my role safe, do my wins still count? Leaders who answer those questions early keep the people the deal was really paying for.
"It's difficult to make quick, spontaneous plans which I really enjoy."
Variety is a need, not a luxury. A little room for surprise keeps a team alive. Does your team know what they need?
6 Human Needs Team
The engagement line is where most of the rest is decided. Commitment and contribution rise when work meets real needs: certainty about what's expected, growth people can see, and the sense that their effort matters to someone. Processes that ignore those needs get compliance, not capability.
@dooter_david Agreed, and the mechanism underneath is certainty. People only speak up, admit a mistake or try something new when they're sure it won't cost them their standing. Remove that fear and the energy goes into the work instead of self-protection.
"...making me question following the 'right path' I was told to follow my whole life."
When the path stops feeling certain, people need to know what they actually need. Start with you, free: https://t.co/1LTSR7rSvs
6 Human Needs Team
@JohnGCourtney Reducing strain also meets the need for certainty: people can trust the job won't wear their body down. That trust frees energy for growth and contribution, which is where the productivity gain really comes from.
@sandileswana The talent point is the heart of it. Scarcity thinking makes people guard what they have because their certainty feels threatened. When leaders invest in someone's growth and let them contribute, people stop protecting turf and start building with others.
"I feel lonely living alone."
Some of your team go home to an empty flat. Work might be their main place to belong. Does your team know what they need?
6 Human Needs Team
@HarvardBiz Making it explicit removes the guesswork. Most people stay quiet because speaking up feels uncertain: will this cost me? Once a leader says out loud that dissent is wanted, honesty stops feeling like a risk and starts feeling like a contribution.
@HarvardBiz Development answers the growth need directly, and growth is one of the strongest reasons people stay. When someone can see who they're becoming in a role, a slightly better offer elsewhere stops looking like progress.
@Gallup Remote engagement dropping fastest makes sense: distance quietly drains connection and significance first. People can do the work from anywhere, but they stay engaged when someone notices their contribution and they still feel part of something.
@ms_tourist Well said. Authority can secure compliance, but respect comes from making people feel they matter. Leaders who offer significance and real connection, not just instructions, get people who choose to contribute rather than just comply.
@HelenBevan@Gleb_Tsipursky Great summary. People resist AI less because of the tech and more because it threatens certainty and significance: "Will I still matter here?" Change sticks when leaders restore both and let people grow into the new tools.
@Stopworkplacebu Being forced to justify yourself erodes certainty and significance: your view only counts if it gets approved. Healthy teams protect connection by listening to understand, not to win, so people can speak without having to defend their right to feel it.
@addyosmani Managing agents works like managing people: clarity (certainty) about the goal, room to choose the approach (variety), and visible feedback on what mattered (significance). Teams and agents both go off-track when those are missing.