@LizzyStarrrdust@WorldWingman You can choose to shame men for finding cheaper alternatives, but your ability to sway them is entirely contingent on whether they think they will ever be able to be happy accepting the proposition.
@LizzyStarrrdust@WorldWingman Every relationship is transactional, at minimum, or else people find reasons to judge you as a person. It's entirely possible for a foreign woman from a poor country to like the loser providing for her, as the rest of the single men were too prideful to help her.
@dian_arifiya Your efforts to fuck over businesses have led to an effect where no businesspeople are willing to conduct themselves in a region controlled by baboos. As there is little profit to be gained, there is little incentive to increase productivity, or compete via higher wages.
@Reboticant@a_musingcat Americans use it as a shorthand for "racketeering/druglord". It was originally an acronym for a law we passed to deal with gangsters.
@Goinkkk@Howlingmutant0 That's probably what the commenter meant. He probably should have immediately brought out the distinction. Socratic dialogue is extremely obnoxious, and is a large part of why they killed him (socrates).
@NerdReich40456@Howlingmutant0 "I think I'm better than you, because I think you think you're better than me, which is why I feel justified in lying to you and trying to fuck you over for my own gain. Also, I think you're retarded, oh wait, did I say that out loud?"
@LizzyStarrrdust There's a fine line. You need to honor your agreements and not let people feel they've been cheated. On the other, you can't tell the truth without everyone killing each other.
@LizzyStarrrdust There are women who exclusively chase attractive men, and then marry an ugly slave later.
You are absolutely correct, though. The reason they ignore such examples is because they'd have to feel sorry for an ugly woman, when they only want to feel sorry for themselves.