Steve Holmlund

Nobody in particular; just hanging with the un-checked masses.

[Steve Holmlund @78383]

From ~3000 years ago, but anticipating Twitter:

Whoever corrects a mocker invites insults;
whoever rebukes the wicked incurs abuse.
Do not rebuke mockers or they will hate you;
rebuke the wise and they will love you. Prov. 9:7-8 (NIV)

[Steve Holmlund @78383]

@marcjoffe Border cities in Orange County may see slight bump in sales. Long Beach soon to be 11%; Huntington Beach is at 7.75%.

[Steve Holmlund @78383]

@Heminator This is correct. I am unable to locate the number of ballots received and counted this way. I don't think the state tracks. Also, "bona fide private mail delivery company" is loosely defined. IRS accepts DHL, UPS, FedEx but note: not via ground shipment.

[Steve Holmlund @78383]

@Mark_Penn The vote in 2021 on AB 37, authored by @AsmMarcBerman

[Steve Holmlund @78383]

@BobHarig I haven't checked the lineups today but in the past it has been surprising to me to see a bunch of well-known players at the same qualifying site. You would think they would target sites with less seasoned competition.

[Steve Holmlund @78383]

@Therealronz @BobHarig The Brits use the plural for singular entities so both sound fine to me.

[Steve Holmlund @78383]

@BobHarig @golferinatlanta I'd go for on course reporter. That's my dream job.

[Steve Holmlund @78383]

@EsotericCD I generally agree with you & you may write about this further, but let me add that there is no way to prove there wasn't fraud (not just paranoia). Apparently, witness signatures aren't verified. The # of accepted ballots with no/illegible post mark may not be tracked. Etc.

[Steve Holmlund @78383]

@AsmMarcBerman

[Susan Shelley @Susan_Shelley]

Possibly the US Supreme Court will fix this for us soon. Watching the results from California, dissenters may be capitulating as we speak.

(California doesn't even require postmarks. Also accepts records of a delivery service. Lacking that, a handwritten date will be accepted.)

[Steve Holmlund @78383]

@KenGardner11 The vote for the current setup:

[Steve Holmlund @78383]

For more info, see bottom of this page:
https://t.co/p1crJwci2S

[Steve Holmlund @78383]

As many point out, CA EC Section 3020.b2 creates fraud risk. Ballets are NOT rejected for having no or illegible postmarks. AFAICT, CA doesn't track # of COUNTED votes with no or illegible postmark. It should! @CASOSVote @baseballcrank @jimgeraghty @WillSwaim @CalMatters

[Steve Holmlund @78383]

I should say, CA may track number of counted ballots with no or illegible postmark but I can't locate where they publish that information.

[Steve Holmlund @78383]

@chriswithans This is the class of votes that needs to be fully understood. The # of ballots with no or illegible post mark might be small but it needs to be separately accounted for because of the great fraud risk. So far I can't find these numbers. @CASOSVote can you assist?

[Steve Holmlund @78383]

@shipwreckedcrew AB 37 2021 signed into law by @GavinNewsom

[Steve Holmlund @78383]

@EsotericCD Shirley, you must be joking…

[Steve Holmlund @78383]

@Elex_Michaelson Here was the vote tally for the current setup. It's not changing any time soon, unfortunately.

[Steve Holmlund @78383]

Vote tally for CA Assembly Bill 37 in 2021 that made California vote-by-mail permanent and extended receipt deadline to 7 days (from 3).
@AsmMarcBerman @GavinNewsom @jimgeraghty @NRO @CalMatters @WillSwaim

[Steve Holmlund @78383]

@gaganbiyani You nailed it. I was reading the election sections of the California Code last night. This is exactly what they do.

[Steve Holmlund @78383]

@jimgeraghty I fear California governance is a hopeless cause until bankruptcy. The mono-party government does what it wants and has a compliant propaganda arm in the mainstream press.

[Steve Holmlund @78383]

@nikunj It’s just “237”….