@SrinivasanSS52 I do most of the coding with Opus but use all other for review for each PR before commit. It takes one pass to resolve most issues using Chorus Codes
@yacineMTB My experience is totally opposite, remote ssh into my dedi server gets faster response over local windows wsl env. I tested with other llm too when building Chorus Codes and same result
Why rely on one LLM when you can have a full panel?
✅ Run multiple code reviews via tmux or headless
✅ No extra API bills—it uses your existing subscriptions
✅ Open source & no paywalls
Stop coding in an echo chamber https://t.co/rytWB0GSSu
@cjzafir Instead of asking Codex to review its own work, I use other LLMs using Chorus Codes to find the blind spots. No one LLM is good enough on its own.
What if you can fire up **multiple code reviews** either using tmux or headless sessions of the CLIs you already pay for Claude Code, Codex, Gemini, OpenCode, etc.
@aibytekat We are building a time tracker that take screenshot every second, all keystrokes, fully self hosted, connects to local Gemma to scan screenshots and alert managers.
@claudeai Just make code better. Less hallucinations, more on point with better context. People will pay more for good product, rarher than solving for edge cases like mobile extension. Focus on the core product and don't chase the next headline.
@AnthropicAI The quickest fix would be stop Claude Code from authenticating more than x sessions at a time. They made it too easy to share with others.
@asmah2107 I would convince the brand to allow me to add a bidding system, auction off a pair every 10 secs to highest bid. Show live countdown, Unit left. You could easily 10x the return. I will code for free for a 10% of anything earned more than the actual sale price.