@RedPandaKoala Oh man you are so full of bullshit, NO Disclosure Tonight did NOT trash ANY of these people. Ivan Hannel did this, in fact he went off the deep end and was trashing EVERYONE and was thrown off the show. Do your OWN research people rather than listening to false narratives...
Access the complete Soviet UFO Reverse Engineering Scan Archive (originals in Russian with English summaries provided) at https://t.co/PPddyAHKn0 with additional research connecting the science to US programs at https://t.co/QPqhkdQqdA (including page by page translations).
Stories about documents aren’t helpful. What matters is access to the materials themselves, where independent analysis can occur. We’re prioritizing disclosure over storytelling to get materials in-the-hands of researchers and investigators.
Russian UFO Files Update: Just prior to her medical emergency, Natalja had made direct contact with one of @g_knapp's original Russian sources on Soviet anomalous phenomena research.
Being a native Russian speaker has its advantages. Doors that stay closed to Western researchers don't always stay closed to us.
The source: Nikolai Kapranov, a Russian physicist who served as Security Advisor to the Soviet Parliament. By Knapp's own account, Kapranov was his "man in Moscow.” The person who arranged Knapp's landmark 1993 trip to interview over a dozen military officials, intelligence operatives, and scientists about secret Soviet UFO programs. Knapp and his principals arranged an office in Moscow and a salary for him. Not a casual acquaintance.
Natalja's approach was straightforward: she introduced herself, explained she was studying her father's 119-page UFO engineering archive, noted possible connections to the SETKA program, and shared a link to the digitized documents. She asked if he could help clarify context.
What followed is a textbook study in managed information exchange.
First, Kapranov claimed he could barely remember George Knapp. The Western journalist who made him his key facilitator in Moscow, arranged a salary and office, and relied on him to broker access to some of the most sensitive Soviet military and intelligence figures… and he recalls "with difficulty"? That strains credulity.
Second, he asked Natalja to reveal the topic before confirming anything asking if this was “about UFOs?” She did, identifying the UFO/UAP connection, the SETKA program, and providing the full archive link (below).
Third, after nearly two weeks with access to the materials, he responded today not with any engagement with the documents themselves, but with a sweeping categorical statement:
confirming research was conducted at the Academy of Sciences, every single episode was investigated, and "not a single one" was found to be anomalous. All had confirmed explanations. Case closed.
This is demonstrably false. The Soviet program's own documented outputs include a residual category of unexplained cases consistent with every serious governmental study of these phenomena worldwide, and consistent with what the very officials Kapranov himself introduced to Knapp reported. A 100% resolution rate is not what the record shows.
It's worth noting: Kapranov was a physicist and parliamentary security advisor, not an Academy of Sciences researcher. He's presenting another institution's conclusions as definitive while speaking from outside it.
Fourth, he closed the door: "I'm sorry if I disappointed you, but this is indeed the case."
Now here's the key analytical question. Kapranov is still in Moscow.
Distancing himself from this topic is understandable. But if self-preservation was the motive, ignoring an unsolicited email from a stranger was the safest play. No obligation, no exposure, no risk.
Instead, he chose to engage across multiple messages over two weeks. He drew out enough information to understand exactly what Natalja had, what she was researching, and how far the analysis had progressed. Then he delivered a categorical shutdown and a definitive counter-narrative designed to close inquiry.
That's not how someone with a bad memory behaves. That's collection followed by a response.
Whether this was self-motivated caution, residual obligation, or something more directed the pattern speaks for itself: assess the inquiry, understand the scope, deliver the denial.
We're not discouraged. We're just getting started. The Černohajev Archive stands on its own merits. The documents are public. The correlations with documented U.S. government programs totaling billions in advanced propulsion, fusion, and MHD research are forensically mapped. No single gatekeeper gets to close that door.
And we speak the language.
🔗 https://t.co/fUOKh8brKT
#UAP #SETKA #Disclosure #RussianUFOfiles #SovietUFO #CernohajevArchive
@sentdefender "What we have got here is a failure to communicate. Some men, you just can't reach. So you get what we have had here this last week, which is the way he wants it... Well, he gets it." Captain, Cool Hand Luke. Slightly modified for now
@Nigel_Farage Did he actually say something? I avoid anything him and his cohorts say like the plague. I've even heard that the Dull Men's Club has refused membership to him stating "He's too dull even for us" and "We are not even providing a Banana for scale".
@thatuapgirl Interesting they are finding crop circles in Dorset now, I thought they were normally in Wiltshire although I did go in a crop circle formation just outside the city of Bath in around 1989 but I've never heard of that one being reported.
@DisclosurePod Thanks for bringing Dr. Rogers out, another voice added and hopefully there will be many more! Was a pleasure to speak with you on Monday's Disclosure Tonight show, I hope you will be back many more times 👍
@MikeDisclosure@thomaslfessler It's crap that Thomas came down with Covid, I remember the after effects from the last time. Wishing Thomas a speedy recovery with no lasting effects. I know there's nothing I can do to help but wishing him well 👍