ziye

meet me in person..

[ziye @ASajaad22]

@Y40IFRQTTING This is very profound idea. The whole of middle east and central, south Asia suffers from this inability to discern political, national differences from race. They still base everything on race like the archaic societies. And this leads to alot of unsolveable political problems.

[ziye @ASajaad22]

@cageofmirrrors The answer is within you sister, can't you read and comprehend like the pahlavists? Today isolate some time, sit still, think and reflect..you will find truth and your blatant hypocrisy and hopefully some shame. Goodluck

[ziye @ASajaad22]

@DrMostapha Absolutely useless outside of USA and few other city-coutries. Moreover it expires in 5- 7 years, and quite expensive money heist traps.

[ziye @ASajaad22]

Been thinking about this effect. Bryan put it in words better

[Bryan Johnson @bryan_johnson]

On Saturday, my children and I would go to the local running and biking trail and hand out water and bars.

People were suspicious.

They'd ask "how much does it cost?" We'd say free. Then they'd ask what cause it was for. We'd say none. At this point they'd be stupefied. There must be a catch. There was no catch.

The suspicion is an appendage of a culture that prioritizes status and money. The more selfless the act looks, the harder they search for the hidden angle.

I was experimenting as a father how to teach virtue. The value of helping someone without agenda or the need to get something back.

There is science to this. It's called the overjustification effect. Give a toddler a reward for helping and afterward they help less. The reward replaces the instinct. By attaching a payoff to a good deed, you corrode the good deed.

Children are born with the instinct to help before anyone rewards them. By age two they are happier giving a treat away than receiving one, and happiest when the treat they give up is their own.

It also causes moral elevation. Watching someone help others lifts the people who are watching and makes them want to do so themselves.

[ziye @ASajaad22]

@cageofmirrrors It's not hard to not know your kind of woman. A hypocrite is visible to everyone and people like me who ain't even iranian finds it disturbing to see hypocrisy and double standards. It's just natural human instinct to call it out.Your actions ain't trivial to the ppl who suffered

[ziye @ASajaad22]

@Dr_Afo For me it's not even the pay. It's just there is so much life outside your narrow speciality fields, life which niche specialists are completely unaware of. Money seizes to matter after a certain point.its either very big money or enough to live a normal life with, not in between

[ziye @ASajaad22]

@FEMMY466 You old docs were gullible. You were used as slaves and it shows. The new generation knows their jobs and the administrative burdens and ther silly ass expectations.

[ziye @ASajaad22]

@_TheWillofE @Drexil__ @thirdmetax Ok, so what exactly is your problem, why you whining 😂

[ziye @ASajaad22]

@FreckedNotGinge @NoahMF If someone ask you to call them x instead of y. Just simply respect them, after all its their life, identity, taste, preference. Unless it's against biology or physics and or controversial like the gender topic.

[ziye @ASajaad22]

@CanesDavid @MaxNagasaku @perrymetzger The two paths you determined for them beforehand, based on your ages old algorithms, thresholds, and minimal, restricted, highly regulated academic data points. Test more, gather astronomically more data, stretch definitions, update algorithms, or stay ignorant and stubborn.

[ziye @ASajaad22]

@Grady_Booch The very fact that you gone to ask the question from anesteziyologists is concerning. Those poor lads don't know anything about the topic beyond some neural pathways and some old drugs. Consciousness is philosophys topic not science.

[ziye @ASajaad22]

@radfugee More info can also mean testing the same hgb a1c in more people in the same 3 months period which is the normal physiological time-line. Let's not play dumb intentionally. Physical, anatomical limits are different than man made algorithms, guidelines etc..

[ziye @ASajaad22]

@jasonryanmd You bring in a new method, technology or practice, you change the literature as well. With whole body scans as routine, the normal/abnormal, the thresholds, the whole pathology and or tumor disease nomenclature change as well. And both docs and society adjust accordingly.

[ziye @ASajaad22]

@AllenPGreenMD @MattZirwas Iam an MD too, but I don't write it everywhere in my face.

[ziye @ASajaad22]

@AllenPGreenMD @MattZirwas People won't freak out once you change the God damn guidelines, thresholds, tumor nomenclature etc..why are the MDs brain so clog and static. Break the paradigms you grew in, think out of the little boxes for a moment.

[ziye @ASajaad22]

@MTomasson @AmandaAskell Docs are the most static, rigid thinkers. If scans becomes routine do you think the standard of care, thresholds and or the diagnostic criteria, cancer or tumors nomenclature etc will stay the same?! The whole system will be curated and updated accordingly.

[ziye @ASajaad22]

@DrSiyabMD The naysayers are the dumb docs who think it will be another Eko, ecg, chest radiograf etc..the pessimists, who think it will stay the same with no improvement and further breakthroughs.

[ziye @ASajaad22]

@Markmanson Bro still think its 2015s 😂

[ziye @ASajaad22]

@MeganKevil This is the right track. The technical sides are now to AI. Humans have to focus more on the least prominent, ignored and sophisticated parts of life in all disciplines of knowledge. No more memorization.