I think Turning Point now realizes that Charlie was using Candace as his kill switch.
He told her everything.
That explains the hostility directed towards her.
They must be scrambling.
@DrFrankTurek The irony is hard to miss. Telling Christians not to scratch itching ears while many believe you chose institutional comfort over loyalty to a friend.
@WordBubbles@RMiller13314049@ReggieRB24@conservmillen That’s precisely what’s being challenged. Christianity doesn’t teach that it is Judaism plus the New Testament. It teaches the fulfillment of the Law and the Prophets in Christ (Matt. 5:17; Heb. 8). “Judeo-Christian” is a political descriptor, not a theological one.
@notyourmamafool@conservmillen Insults don’t establish doctrine. Christianity has produced creeds, catechisms, and confessions for 2,000 years. Surely you can explain one hyphenated term without outsourcing the answer to a podcast.
@dsummer69@conservmillen If the answer is clear, it should be easy to summarize. “Go watch my podcast” isn’t a theological argument. I’m asking for one sentence: what doctrine does “Judeo-Christian” communicate that “Christian” does not?
@RealRichardBail@conservmillen Romans doesn’t answer the question I’m asking. It explains the relationship between Jews and Gentiles in salvation history. It does not explain what theological distinction the modern label “Judeo-Christian” adds beyond simply saying “Christian.”
@parteagirl@conservmillen St. Paul summarized the Gospel in a few paragraphs. The Nicene Creed summarizes the faith in a few lines. I’m simply asking for the theological distinction in the same spirit of clarity. “It’s somewhere in my podcast” is an appeal to faux authority, not an argument.
@JohnJoeMerwin@conservmillen You’re describing the significance of ethnic Israel in salvation Hx. No one disputes that. You still haven’t answered the Q: what doctrine is communicated by “Judeo-Christian” that isn’t already communicated by “Christian”? Romans 11 doesn’t require a new theological category.
@ctmancix@conservmillen "Go consume hours of my content" isn't a rebuttal. It's an advertisement. A sound theological argument should fit in a paragraph. The apostles managed it. The Church Fathers managed it. Why can't she? No one is asking for a new answer.
@Woefkardoef@conservmillen I don’t mind listening. I’m happy to engage with arguments. I’m less interested in appeals to “go consume my content.” A summary shouldn’t be difficult if the point is clear. If the argument is compelling, it should survive a concise explanation.
@RMiller13314049@ReggieRB24@conservmillen That’s the very point under debate. Christians don’t merely add the New Testament to Judaism. Christianity is the fulfillment of the Old Covenant in Christ. “Judeo-Christian” can obscure that fundamental theological distinction.
@JohnJoeMerwin@conservmillen You’ve answered “Who were Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob?” No one disputed that. The unanswered question remains: what doctrine is communicated by “Judeo-Christian” that isn’t already communicated by simply saying “Christian”?
@conservmillen "Go listen to my podcast" isn't really an answer. If the thesis is correct, it should be possible to summarize it here. What theological necessity requires the term "Judeo-Christian" instead of simply "Christian"?
Hey guys— just wanted to let you know that the influencers and TPUSA are absolutely lying about the existence of footage of Tyler Robinson (or any person for that matter) assembling the gun on the rooftop.
That footage does not exist.
Save this tweet. It will age well.
@CarriePrejean1 Allie wrote a lengthy response but never actually addressed your central argument. No one disputes Protestant influence in early America. The real question is why a modern political slogan is being treated as historic Christian theology.
@conservmillen Notice how the conversation keeps drifting into demographics and colonial history instead of addressing the actual issue: what is the theological necessity of the term "Judeo-Christian"? Two thousand years of Christian history managed just fine without it.
Were we ever provided a list of which FBI agent were on the ground at UVU within 16 minutes of the explosive going off?
That’s actually a fascinating admission given the fact that the FBI office is located in Salt Lake City— a 45 minute drive away. What were the agents doing so close to UVU that day? Who were the first agents to arrive?
@RabbiJepstein@RealAlexJones Dude, he assembled and disassembled it while sprinting to and fro. But that’s only after he shoved it down his pants. The friction from his legs warmed it up so it’s easier to do. Come on man, basic knowledge.