Abu Chillin’

[Abu Chillin’ @AbuChillin]

@AlAkradSalafi @mk_muwahid Yes and no. Ijma forms at a particular point in time (e.g. all scholars among the Companions agree) and after that no scholar that comes later and disagrees can undo the ijma. Their disagreement is irrelevant.

[Abu Chillin’ @AbuChillin]

@Shuounislamiya @MMetaphysician Bruh get a life how are you writing this long thing filled with emotion that pretty much nobody will read loool

[Abu Chillin’ @AbuChillin]

@AbuMusaAlSuri @KItreal512 @mfebbyangga0 Be silent ya jahil. You are the bottom set student. The finger gesture he is doing is directly from Jahm ibn Safwan.

[Abu Chillin’ @AbuChillin]

@abdul_now Not in terms of beliefs but in terms of content/perspective/approach etc

[Abu Chillin’ @AbuChillin]

@abdul_now Nice, I’m assuming you’ve read Ibn al Qayyim ‘On Divine Wisdom’ (I’m reading atm) - do they differ much?

[Abu Chillin’ @AbuChillin]

@RaadTheShepherd What “hadith” is he referring to lol

[Abu Chillin’ @AbuChillin]

@brhymhanif Sure

[Abu Chillin’ @AbuChillin]

@brhymhanif Ibn Taymiyyah was objectively more knowledgeable than the four Imams (for example, he was an expert in all maddhabs whereas the Imams were only expert in their own). The reason he says it’s not impermissible to say this is because his knowledge is built upon theirs.

[Abu Chillin’ @AbuChillin]

@HATzortzis @RaadTheShepherd This ikhwani political pragmatism leads to the Fire. Be a man, have your beliefs and cooperate with others beneficially in a way that pleases Allah. You don’t need to bend the knee like a slave of the creation - we already know it makes you sick inside.

[Abu Chillin’ @AbuChillin]

@HATzortzis @RaadTheShepherd We know your livelihood depends on Asharis and Maturidis donating Hamza. You only “prefer” a “nuaced-long-term” approach because you wrongly believe your rizq lies with the masses, the 72 sects, the bulk of whom are Ashari and Maturidi. Salafis want Allah to be pleased with you.

[Abu Chillin’ @AbuChillin]

@nur_ud_din 2/2 Even if this news story was true, it would be a general prohibition in society and a specific exception which indicates the opposite of believing it to be halal (rather it indicates following desires/seeking the dunya).

[Abu Chillin’ @AbuChillin]

@nur_ud_din السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته akhi

Ibn Uthaymeen’s statement is regarding alcohol sold openly in the markets and being available in the fridges, it implies a general permissibility in the society, and 1/2 Bashar was a kafir no doubt.

[Abu Chillin’ @AbuChillin]

@ibmsulaymani السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته akhi. There should be AI programs that can quickly translate this and then a human can watch through it once and make corrections where there are errors.

[Abu Chillin’ @AbuChillin]

@levantophile Druze detected, opinion rejected.

[Abu Chillin’ @AbuChillin]

@ibnalahwaz @ShaikhDadow Thank you for your good deeds.

[Abu Chillin’ @AbuChillin]

@othmaanX @ibnalahwaz @ShaikhDadow Ta’wil is a condition before making their blood and wealth halal. Both Ibn Baz and Dadow have the same position. Ta’wil is not a condition where the kufr is ma3loom fi deen bil darura (such as istighatha) for takfir on the tongue (i.e. takfir that is done outside the court room)

[Abu Chillin’ @AbuChillin]

@othmaanX @ibnalahwaz @ShaikhDadow Alhamdulillah. May Allah bless you. Also please forgive me for my rudeness towards you. If you turn on the ability for me to DM you I can send more info that you can look into.

[Abu Chillin’ @AbuChillin]

@othmaanX @ibnalahwaz @ShaikhDadow Neither is istighatha to other than Allah my brother. By consensus of the Muslims. Even Dadow believes what I’m saying, you have just misinterpreted his statement which refers to barriers to making people’s blood and wealth halal. This is why you need to study properly.