Miecz Nemezis

Retweet nie oznacza poparcia

[Miecz Nemezis @AcznyJan]

Spis treści

[Maciek Józefiak @JozefiakMaciek]

Żyjemy w kraju, w którym zwykły obywatel musi tłumaczyć politykowi z wyższym wykształceniem podstawy polskiej racji stanu na poziomie szkoły podstawowej.

[Antiselfist @Antiselfist]

Nie wiem dlaczego miałoby to obchodzić jakiegokolwiek dumnego Polaka, podobnie jak piwne opinie jakiegoś bezbożnego ćpuna z drugiej strony Cieszyna.

[Stanisław Żerko @StZerko]

Lektura dla tych, którzy dziś deklarują, że w razie napaści na Polskę nie będą bronić ojczyzny.

[Pan_komentator @PanP23929]

Igor Zalewski o pseudoaferze z końmi Karola Nawrockiego:

„Jest takie powiedzenie: rozdymać kondoma do rozmiarów cepelina. No to tutaj ewidentnie ta sprawa została rozdęta, rozdymanie kuca za 2 tys. złotych do rozmiarów wielkiego ogiera”
„Robić z tego jakiś kluczowy zarzut wobec prezydenta to świadczy o braku inwencji, braku tematów poważniejszych dla polityków koalicji”

Strzelają ślepakami i robią z siebie pośmiewisko.

[Republicans against Trump @RpsAgainstTrump]

Poland’s embassy in Washington blasts Tucker Carlson for justifying Hitler’s 1939 invasion of Poland.

Bogdan Klich, the embassy’s chargé d’affaires, called his comments “false” and “deeply troubling” and demanded that Carlson retract them and apologize.

[TheKraken.pl @TheKraken_pl]

Tyle w temacie 🤙

[Tom Rose @TomRoseIndy]

Tucker Carlson’s “interview” with the great Jacob Rees-Mogg shows why he's is the most dangerous demagogue in America. He's an historical illiterate posing as a modern-day Herodotus.

This isn;'t really about ignorance or contrarianism. By “challenging” every settled historical truth, his aim is to erase every moral distinction and reduce history to a series of supposedly "unanswered questions"—all of which, not coincidentally, turn the decent into the demonic and the demonic into the decent.

Hitler's "legitimate claims" against Poland justify the conquest and destruction of an entire nation in the most murderous occupation in human history? Was defeating Nazi Germany even worth it? By asking these "so-called" questions, Tucker's goal isn't to illuminate history, it's to invert it.

Aggressors become victims. Victims become aggressors. Dictators are statesmen. Democracies defending themselves are warmongers. The guilt for history's greatest crimes are stripped of context, so responsibility can shift to the victims of those crimes.

Rewriting history to cast Nazi Germany as the victim and Poland—the nation Hitler invaded, occupied, terrorized and sought to destroy—as the criminal is the deliberate destruction of moral truth and a grotesque insult to a nation that paid in blood unmatched in the annals of human crime. @Jacob_Rees_Mogg @NawrockiKn @D_Tarczynski @radeksikorski @donaldtusk @marklevinshow @tedcruz @SpencerGuard @VDHanson

[Marek Tatała @MarekTatala]

Jacob Rees-Mogg: same patience, two very different kinds of fools

[Dispropaganda @Dispropoganda]

Tucker Carlson "logic".

[Pan_komentator @PanP23929]

Michał Kołodziejczak o Alercie RCB:

Prusinowski: Lubelskie, Lubuskie, to może się pomylić?

Kołodziejczak: Zdarzają się takie rzeczy, no też z błędów i z problemów trzeba umieć wychodzić.

Prusinowski: Ale to mogą się zdarzyć dziecku w 5. klasie podstawówki, nie mogą się zdarzyć w poważnym państwie.

Kołodziejczak: Nie mogą, no nie mogą.

Prusinowski: Ale się zdarzają.

Kołodziejczak: Zdarzają, no zdarzają się w ogóle różne rzeczy w życiu.

Nie wiem, czy się śmiać, czy płakać XD

[Pilecki-Institut Berlin @PileckiInstitut]

Tucker Carlson’s apologia for Nazi Germany’s aggression and totalitarianism

Once again, Tucker Carlson offers apologia for Nazi Germany’s aggression, this time in his conversation with Sir Jacob Rees-Mogg. While Mr Rees-Mogg does a formidable job of countering Mr Carlson’s most egregious falsehoods, it is worth digging deeper into the historical distortions underpinning his argument.

“I’m certainly not here defending Hitler. I’m just saying the idea that Hitler just randomly rolled into Poland is a lie and everyone believes it because they know nothing about the actual facts.”

Indeed, Hitler did not invade Poland “randomly”. But the “actual facts” are conspicuously absent from Carlson’s own account.

Hitler sought to destroy Poland’s independence and subject its people to German domination, as part of a broader project of conquest and racial empire in Europe. The German occupation brought systematic terror: the murder of Polish elites, the destruction and plunder of cultural heritage, mass expulsions, and the exploitation of millions as forced labourers. Those Poles not slated for expulsion or destruction were to be reduced to a leaderless slave labour force serving Germany's imperial ambitions. For Poland’s Jews, persecution, dispossession and ghettoisation were followed by systematic extermination, as the regime pursued the murder of European Jewry.

Carlson asks:
“...I’ve never understood: Why fight the Second World War in the first place?”

Britain and France entered the war following Germany’s invasion of Poland and their commitments to resist further aggression. Hitler’s occupation of the Czech lands in March 1939 had already demonstrated that his ambitions extended beyond incorporating German-speaking populations. Britain risked having to face a continent dominated by Nazi Germany, with its potential allies defeated or subordinated.

Contrary to Carlson´s claims, resisting German expansion was therefore consistent with Britain’s longstanding strategy of maintaining a European balance of power to protect its own security and imperial position. The threat was compounded by the regime’s brutality, already evident in the 1930s. In May 1940, Churchill described it as a “monstrous tyranny, never surpassed in the dark, lamentable catalogue of human crime”.

Ironically, Polish criticism of Britain has often focused on its failure to provide sufficient assistance, rather than its decision to enter the war, a perspective obscured by Carlson’s patronising treatment of Poland and other countries in Central and Eastern Europe. Britain and France failed to provide effective military relief during the September 1939 campaign, while Poland’s subsequent contribution to the Allied war effort received insufficient recognition. Polish pilots made a crucial contribution to the Battle of Britain. Yet when London celebrated victory in 1946, the Polish soldiers and sailors who had fought alongside British forces were denied representation in the Victory Parade.

The subsequent course of the war revealed the full horror of Nazi domination: concentration camps, systematic terror, forced labour and a war of annihilation. The Second World War became the deadliest war in human history, claiming tens of millions of lives. An estimated 5.6–5.8 million Polish citizens perished, including approximately three million Polish Jews murdered in the Holocaust. The Holocaust was a chapter of unparalleled horror, driven by the Nazi ambition to annihilate the Jewish people worldwide, to murder every Jew wherever they could be reached. In total, approximately six million Jews were murdered.

Apparently, this is still not enough of a “why” for Mr Carlson.

Carlson also claims:
“Well, Hitler said that 15% of Poland was once Germany and it was given to Poland at the Treaty of Versailles. That was German territory with Germans in it. That was his case. And by the way, that was true.”

Leaving aside the fact that territorial grievances could never justify aggression or a war of conquest, let alone grievances over borders established by international treaties, this account requires two essential corrections.

First, having belonged to the German Empire did not make these territories exclusively or inherently German. Although not all had remained part of Poland until the partitions, large areas, notably Greater Poland and Pomerelia, had. Despite policies of Germanisation and state-sponsored German settlement, particularly in the nineteenth century, they retained substantial Polish populations alongside German minorities. Describing them simply as “German territory with Germans” erases both their Polish history and their Polish inhabitants. Danzig, predominantly German-speaking, had a distinct status as a Free City under League of Nations protection, with special rights for Poland.

Second, these territorial demands must be understood within Hitler’s broader attempt to subordinate Poland to German ambitions. At this stage, Nazi Germany sought to draw Poland into an anti-Soviet alignment under German dominance, serving Hitler’s wider ambition to carve out “Lebensraum” in Eastern Europe. Demands concerning Danzig and an extraterritorial transport corridor were advanced alongside pressure for Poland to join the Anti-Comintern Pact.

Hitler himself made abundantly clear that his objectives extended far beyond territorial revision. According to the record of his meeting with senior military commanders on 23 May 1939, he declared: “Danzig is not the subject of the dispute at all.” Instead, he identified the objective as expanding Germany’s “living space” in the East and securing food supplies.

Days before the invasion, Hitler’s instructions were even more explicit. The surviving notes of his address to senior military commanders at Obersalzberg on 22 August 1939 record: “Have no pity. Brutal attitude.” He also announced that he would supply a propaganda pretext for war, regardless of its plausibility.

The following day, Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union signed the Hitler–Stalin Pact. Its secret protocol divided Eastern Europe into German and Soviet spheres of influence and envisaged the partition of Poland. Subsequently Germany invaded on 1 September 1939; the Soviet Union invaded from the east on 17 September. This was not simply a dispute over former German territory, but an assault on Poland’s independence by two totalitarian powers, both of which sought to destroy Poland’s elites.

Finally, the Nuremberg Tribunal endorsed the assessment of Paul Schmidt, an official interpreter at the German Foreign Office, that the Nazi leadership’s general objectives included “the domination of the European Continent”, to be pursued first through the incorporation of German-speaking groups and then through territorial expansion under the slogan of “Lebensraum”.

The dissemination of Nazi and totalitarian apologetics through a podcast with a vast international audience is deeply troubling in a number of ways. The post-war international order was founded on commitments to restrain aggression, protect human rights and prevent genocide. Upholding those commitments requires an understanding of the historical experiences that gave rise to them and the willingness to confront attempts to excuse aggression and domination.

Offering apologia for Hitler and Nazi Germany normalises the use of historical grievances to justify contemporary aggression. It undermines human rights and the principles underpinning a rules-based international order. Carlson’s treatment of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine reflects the same pattern: the aggressor’s grievances take centre stage, while the sovereignty and rights of those under attack recede from view.

What is at stake therefore extends beyond the interpretation of the Second World War. The quest for historical truth is also a quest for a better future.ed

@edwardlucas
@EdwardGLuce
@FareedZakaria
@campbellclaret
@RoryStewartUK
@TimothyDSnyder
@Roger_Moorhouse
@davidfrum
@JonahDispatch
@aroberts_andrew
@TomRtweets
@jkirchick

[Jacek Karnowski @JacekKarnowski]

Wypowiedź Tuckera Carlsona usprawiedliwiająca atak Hitlera na Polskę uśmierca go w polskich oczach na zawsze. Jacob Rees-Mogg, wybitny konserwatysta brytyjski, wygrał to starcie miażdżąco.

[Kochany Prezes @KochanyPrezio]

To jest absolutny top fajnopolskiego grażynizmu. Dodałem do zakładek. 100 lat będzie służyć. 🥰

[Maciej Kożuszek @Bekartsmekart]

Kolega Kuisz i koleżanką Wigura zachęcali za to prezydenta USA by wstrzymał wsparcie militarne dla Polski, bo w niej praworządność jest łamana

[Miecz Nemezis @AcznyJan]

@MagdalenaSroka @SlawomirMentzen @nowePSL @marcin_borys może Pan pomoże posłance, bo nie może chyba znaleźć skutecznego systemu samoobrony dla kobiet?

[Miecz Nemezis @AcznyJan]

@MagdalenaSroka @SlawomirMentzen @nowePSL Kolejny dzień bez konkretów @MagdalenaSroka
https://t.co/gFsZLYow1r

[Miecz Nemezis @AcznyJan]

@MagdalenaSroka @nowePSL @MagdalenaSroka dobrze Pani wie,,że policjant zbytnio nie może używać broni. Jaki system samoobrony jest skuteczny dla kobiet w konfrontacji z agresywnymi dużymi chłopami z Kaukazu?

[Miecz Nemezis @AcznyJan]

@MagdalenaSroka @nowePSL @MagdalenaSroka to jaki jest ten skuteczny system samoobrony dla kobiet?

[Miecz Nemezis @AcznyJan]

@MagdalenaSroka @nowePSL @MagdalenaSroka dobrze Pani wie,,że policjant zbytnio nie może używać broni. Jaki system samoobrony jest skuteczny dla kobiet w konfrontacji z agresywnymi dużymi chłopami z Kaukazu?

[Adam Makuła @adam_makula]

Zaraz! To nasze miejsca pracy uciekają do Indii, a Braun chciałby sprowadzać Hindusów, i to jeszcze przez jakąś indyjsko-rosyjską firmę? 😳🤯