,,Ryzyko śmierci z powodu Polio wynosi 1 na 1 bilion
Ryzyko śmierci z powodu szczepionki przeciwko Polio wynosi 1 na 215 tys.
Ryzyko śmierci z powodu Błonnicy wynosi 1 na 42,5 miliona
Ryzyko śmierci z powodu szczepionki przeciwko Błonnicy wynosi 1 na 76 tys.
Ryzyko śmierci z powodu Tężca wynosi 1 na 1,5 miliona
Ryzyko śmierci z powodu Szczepionki przeciwko Tężcowi wynosi 1 na 76 tys.
Ryzyko śmierci z powodu Krztuśca wynosi 1 na 2,3 miliona
Ryzyko śmierci z powodu szczepionki przeciwko Krztuścowi wynosi 1 na 76 tys.
Ryzyko śmierci z powodu Odry wynosi 1 na 106,5 miliona
Ryzyko śmierci z powodu szczepionki przeciwko Odzie wynosi 1 na 108 tys.
Ryzyko śmierci z powodu Świerzbia wynosi 1 na 40,3 miliona
Ryzyko śmierci z powodu szczepionki przeciwko Świerzbia wynosi 1 na 108 tys.
Ryzyko śmierci z powodu Krwawień wynosi 1 na 0/nieznaczne
Ryzyko śmierci z powodu szczepionki przeciwko Krwawieniom wynosi 1 na 108 tys.
Ryzyko śmierci z powodu Ospy wietrznej wynosi 1 na 32,3 miliona
Ryzyko śmierci z powodu szczepionki przeciwko Ospie wietrznej wynosi 1 na 202 tys.
Ryzyko śmierci z powodu WZW-A wynosi 1 na 1,6 miliona
Ryzyko śmierci z powodu szczepionki przeciwko WZW-A wynosi 1 na 73 tys.
...,,
@BitcoinSVCOL@coinbase I was just explaining to my network of investors how Coinbase did BSV investors dirty by not allowing them to reclaim their BSV UTXOs... how Coinbase kept their own customers' BSVs for themselves.
Now this???
Incredible synchronicity.
There is, of course, a rather obvious reason the large AI companies have shown so little enthusiasm for giving customers a genuinely portable, hard economic budget that can be spent competitively across models. Such a system would make efficiency visible. Visibility is a terribly dangerous thing when one's business model is based upon selling consumption.
Imagine giving a task ten cents of real, transferable value and allowing Claude, GPT, Gemini, Grok and whatever else happens to be fashionable that week to compete for it. Same task. Same budget. Same external tools. Measure the verified result. Suddenly all the mythology disappears. One model might solve the problem for two cents. Another might spend nine cents producing a magnificent procession of supervisors, critics, reflections and synthetic committee meetings before arriving at the same answer. One could no longer hide behind “agentic sophistication”. We would simply call the second system inefficient.
That is what a real micropayment architecture would expose. It would create an actual market for inference. Models would compete not merely on benchmark scores carefully produced under different conditions, but on useful output per unit of value consumed. Users could discover which model researches most efficiently, which codes most efficiently, which reasons most efficiently and which merely possesses an extraordinary talent for converting tokens into invoices. A graph that genuinely added value would survive. One that existed principally to keep the machinery moving would become economically embarrassing.
I cannot prove that any particular company has consciously decided, in some wonderfully sinister board meeting, that efficiency must never be measured. Fortunately, no conspiracy is required. The incentives are quite sufficient. A company selling inference has little natural commercial reason to encourage a market whose principal achievement would be showing customers how to purchase less inference. Vendors naturally prefer comparisons that emphasise capability. Customers should demand comparisons that include cost.
Real money would make that possible. Give every system the same purse and make it compete. No unlimited internal allowance. No provider-specific credits that cannot leave the garden. No vague promises about “efficient orchestration”. Let the models buy computation with scarce, transferable value and publish what they achieved with it.
Then we would finally discover which systems are intelligent enough to produce value and which are merely intelligent enough to spend your money.
Novak Djokovic in his documentary on why he refused the COVID vaccine:
"Because I didn't need it. Why should I get the vaccine? I'm healthy, I'm an athlete. I had corona. I had immunity. I wasn't a threat to anyone. There was no reason for me to get vaccinated. It's my freedom to choose which that fundamental right that you have as a human being on this planet — the freedom to choose — which was taken from a lot of people."
"🚨 Ten filmik powinien zobaczyć każdy, kto jeszcze wierzy w hasła „mieszkanie to prawo człowieka”, „ludzie ponad zyskiem” i „darmowa służba zdrowia”.
Młoda kobieta kupuje socjalistyczne obietnice… a potem ląduje w 2050 roku, gdzie te obietnice stały się rzeczywistością.
Efekt?
Chce wrócić natychmiast.
„Beware of the gap between promises and reality.”
— Independent Women’s Voice
https://t.co/rfpdTAMja5
#Socjalizm #DSA #ObietniceVsReality
@thepolandnews_ Szczeka murzyn? Szczeka. Może nie pasować? Może. Pani Ewa ma rację. Już był jeden ukrainiec co skakał i udawal pajaca. Wspomaganie nagrywania takim idiotom napędza ich zasięgi.
What happens when one of Europe’s most powerful voices bypasses big tech entirely?
@SirToshiTV just dropped a massive exclusive with @thecoastguy (Neil Oliver), one of the leading voices in the global truth movement, seen on Tucker Carlson, Candace Owens, and major independent networks.
This entire interview is hosted exclusively on @PaiyBit, streaming directly on Bitcoin. Part 1 is live right now for under $2, with Part 2 dropping soon.
Keep in mind, this is a real Web3 build in its early stages. Have a little patience, the UI is still raw and playback might buffer a bit, but seeing pay-per-second content running directly on-chain is the future. Bravo men.
Pro tip: set up your account first and fund your on-platform wallet before hitting play for the smoothest experience.
Watch Part 1 here: https://t.co/HnEg0zf8NB
@PhilKonieczny Po 16 latach bytu btc (a moze tylko 9 latach?) powiedz czy on sie do czegos nadaje? niz tylko 7tps i podnoszenia fee za przelew gdy wszyscy chca robic transfery tu i teraz. Po tylu latach powinien byc u kazdego w telefonie, u kazdej babci, prosty i intuicyjny w uzyciu.
@FinansowyUmysl I na co tym korporacjom pieniądze ktore bedziemy musieli dostac za darmo? To już nie bedzie sexy. Co innego będzie wartością o ktora wszyscy beda się bić. Powietrze, woda, czas, prąd?
🚨 HEALTHY BABY DESTROYED IN ONE NIGHT BY VACCINES 🚨
This is what a vaccine injured infant looks like.
You don’t get to look away. This is heartbreaking but this is what is happening immediately following vaccinations and it’s time to stop ignoring the mothers.
Ask Greg. Ask Max. Ask the others too—the ones whose reputations now require so much careful upholstery and scented air.
Ask them what they were doing in 2014, before the money acquired its respectable costume, before everyone discovered morality as a late-career accessory. Ask them about the island. Ask them who was there. Ask them whom they met. Ask them what was discussed. Ask them why the memory, so vivid when useful, becomes suddenly consumptive when inconvenient.
Do not accuse. That would be vulgar.
Simply ask.
There is no instrument of torture quite so elegant as a well-placed question. It requires no shouting, no theatre, no melodrama. Merely place the inquiry before them like a silver knife beside the fish course and watch which hand trembles first.
For men of this sort are never afraid of lies. Lies can be managed, polished, improved, endowed, footnoted, and served to the public with a little parsley. What they fear is chronology. Dates are terribly ill-bred things. They refuse to flatter. They sit there, plain and stubborn, while clever men perspire around them.
So ask them about 2014.
Ask them before they began presenting themselves as guardians of virtue, stewards of progress, philosophers of the public good, or whatever other inexpensive costume ambition found hanging in the charity shop of institutional respectability.
Ask them about the visit.
Ask them who opened the door.
Ask them who was already inside.
Ask them who they recognised.
Ask them who recognised them.
Ask them what they thought they were doing there.
Then be quiet.
Silence is underrated. It gives cowards room to decorate themselves. Some will laugh too quickly. Some will become legalistic. Some will become offended, which is always the most economical substitute for innocence. Some will suddenly discover the sanctity of privacy, having spent years treating everyone else’s life as raw material for their own ascent.
And then, having asked, do not help them. Do not soften the question. Do not provide the exit. Let them build their own little ladder out of denials, evasions, qualifications, and that most exquisite modern material: reputational concern.
One should never interrupt a man while he is composing his own indictment.
Smart people study the game.
Rich people enter the game.
That is why stupid people sometimes get rich.
And smart people stay broke.
Not because stupidity is stronger than intelligence.
But because imperfect action is stronger than perfect hesitation.