@depresseddancer@mata_bata@d_galasinski Cervical cancer screening (Pap smears) is actually the best cancer screening program we have. You should do that one, but not too often. US recommendations are for every five years, assuming it also includes a test for HPV. The case for other cancer screening is much weaker.
@mata_bata Way too many clinicians are not aware. Clinicians, students, citizens, and policymakers need to understand this: cancer screening involves trade-offs. Individual patients should decide based on the best evidence and their own values and preferences
Please indulge me for a rare (but brief) thread of personal comments.
I was on a city bus in Copenhagen early this morning. A young man clearly suffering from mental illness was screaming angrily. Not an unusual occurrence on urban transport. Passengers ignored him. 1/
@grepmeded My book, Cancer Screening Decisions: A Patient-Centered Approach, includes decision aids for screening for breast, lung, colorectal, and prostate cancers. The colorectal section compares data for colonoscopy vs stool testing. The breast cancer section includes 3 age cohorts
@VinayPrasadMD Cancers are heterogeneous. There is much better evidence for cervical and colorectal cancer screening than breast because they have detectable, slow-growing precursors #cancerscreeningdecisions
@kennylinafp @aafp The best CRC screening test is the one that gets done. Colonoscopy offers only tiny benefits over stool testing, but with substantially more burden and risk. We should help patients make choices informed by their own values and preferences. #CancerScreeningDecisions