everyone will lose their job
everyone will lose their jo
everyone will lose their j
everyone will lose their
everyone will lose their
everyone will lose thei
everyone will lose the
everyone will lose th
everyone will lose t
everyone will lose
everyone will los
everyone will lo
everyone will l
everyone will
everyone will
everyone wil
everyone wi
everyone w
everyone
everyon
everyo
every
ever
eve
ev
e
ev
eve
ever
every
everyo
everyon
everyone
everyone s
everyone sh
everyone sho
everyone shou
everyone shoul
everyone should
everyone should u
everyone should us
everyone should use
everyone should use
everyone should use m
everyone should use my
everyone should use my
everyone should use my p
everyone should use my pr
everyone should use my pro
everyone should use my prod
everyone should use my produ
everyone should use my produc
everyone should use my product
I run every day for 20 minutes & if I miss a day, I add 20 minutes to the next day. This has truly been a game changer. Tomorrow, I'm supposed to run for 4 months.
🎉 November Giveaway! 🎉
We’re giving away the Crescent and Luna IEMs, both winners of the VGP 2026 Award, to TWO lucky winners! 🎧
How to enter:
1️⃣ Follow us @ziigaat
2️⃣ Like and retweet this tweet ❤️🔁
3️⃣ Comment which ZiiGaat product you’d love to experience the most!
Deadline: November 3rd. (GMT+8)
#ziigaat #audio #music #favorite #giveaways
#giveawaytime #audiophile #MusicLovers
I attend the Traditional Latin Mass. I wear bowties. I read old books. I smoke cigars. I'm married with three kids under four. I'm what they call a "trad." And I stan Luce.
The Book of Mormon is widely regarded as lacking historical credibility, with a consensus among scholars that it does not have any verifiable historical basis. They all argue that Joseph Smith fabricated its contents and prove it. Your denial of the Trinity, along with your acceptance of revisionist history, shows a blatant disregard for established historical facts.
It's astonishing how you cope with this contradiction. Despite being asked by @Burgess7281975 to provide evidence, you have failed to do so.
Here is a very brief list of sources on why mormonism is not Christianity and how you promote heresy.
Fawn M. Brodie's "No Man Knows My History: The Life of Joseph Smith" is a highly regarded biography that provides a deep and critical look at Joseph Smith, despite generating controversy within Mormon circles. Brodie was a prominent historian and biographer known for her rigorous approach.
Richard Lyman Bushman, in his comprehensive and balanced biography "Joseph Smith: Rough Stone Rolling," presents a detailed account of Smith’s life. Bushman, a respected historian and professor emeritus at Columbia University, offers insights into Smith’s life and works, despite being a practicing Mormon himself.
Jerald and Sandra Tanner, known critics of Mormonism, have extensively published works such as "Mormonism: Shadow or Reality?" which are frequently cited by those challenging LDS claims. Their rigorous examination of Mormon doctrines and history is well respected among critics.
Grant H. Palmer's "An Insider's View of Mormon Origins" provides significant critiques from his perspective as a former LDS Church Educational System employee. Palmer’s scholarly approach has been influential both within and outside Mormon circles.
Dan Vogel, an independent historian and researcher, offers detailed and critical analyses of Joseph Smith and early Mormonism in "Joseph Smith: The Making of a Prophet." Vogel’s work is known for its depth and critical perspective.
John L. Brooke, a historian specializing in American religious history, explores the broader religious and cultural influences on early Mormonism in "The Refiner’s Fire: The Making of Mormon Cosmology, 1644-1844." His scholarly work sheds light on the context surrounding Smith’s religious innovations.
Robert M. Price, a well-known biblical scholar and critic of Christian fundamentalism and Mormonism, examines Mormon scriptures in "Latter-Day Scripture." Price’s extensive publications and membership in the Jesus Seminar lend significant weight to his critiques.
Michael Marquardt, an independent researcher, critically examines Mormon history in "The Rise of Mormonism: 1816-1844." His numerous publications provide a thorough analysis of the foundational events of Mormonism.
Richard Abanes, in "One Nation Under Gods," explores various religious movements with a critical eye, including Mormonism. Abanes, an author and journalist, is known for his comprehensive and critical approach.
Walter Martin's "The Kingdom of the Cults" is a standard reference for critiques of Mormonism and other new religious movements. Martin was a well-known Christian apologist specializing in counter-cult apologetics, and his work remains influential.
The Institute for Religious Research (IRR) provides extensive critiques of Mormonism from a conservative Christian perspective, highlighting historical and doctrinal inconsistencies. Their work on the failed prophecies of Joseph Smith is particularly notable.
The Harvard Theological Review published an article titled "Joseph Smith's Revision of the Bible: Fraudulent, Pathologic, Or Prophetic?" which critically examines Smith’s changes to biblical texts.
The Christian Apologetics & Research Ministry (CARM) offers critiques of Joseph Smith’s prophecies and doctrinal claims. Their analysis of Joseph Smith’s false prophecies is a key resource for understanding the flaws in his prophetic claims.
Your contention that Nestorianism has nothing to do with “who Mary was” is not at all accurate (and Mary IS and always will be the Mother of God).
Here’s a Citation from the Council of Ephesus.
The First Anathema proposed:
“1. If anyone does not confess that Emmanuel is God in truth, and therefore that the holy virgin is the mother of God (for she bore in a fleshly way the Word of God become flesh, let him be anathema.”
https://t.co/u8UojXm7CL
#CatholicTwitter
#CatholicX
It’s reported that this woman is the granddaughter of Protestant theologian Johannes Vlaardingerbroek. Some people are asking, why did she and her father choose to enter full communion with the Catholic Church?
Well, we’d have to ask her. But let’s ask a broader question: Why do Protestants cross the Tiber?
The fact is, the so-called Reformation was not a reformation at all but a revolution. It is self-evident from its outset that it reduced the Word of God to every man’s opinion, a problem which continues today. The phrase “Protestant Reformation” is an English Protestant term which does not accurately reflect its historical context nor its present outcome.
Catholics acknowledge that there were problems among the members of the Church in the 16th century. However, when a plate is dirty, you don’t smash it. You wash it.
If you’re in love with the truth of God’s divine revelation contained in the scriptures, the only solution to today’s chaos and confusion is full communion with the Catholic Church, for she alone has the Spirit-guided power to infallibly interpret the scriptures. The fact is, Protestants cannot agree on the nature of baptism and the other sacraments, divorce, sin, what the Church is, and even the nature of salvation itself. They turn to one "leader" after another, each of whom says something different, and each of whom claims for himself to be an authority on God’s word.
This chaos is not the work of God. It began as the work of men who jettisoned the Church and divorced themselves from the Christian Fathers who came before them. These men set out on their own new path.
Why cross the Tiber? Because truth matters. If we love Christ, we must too love what’s true, not simply read the Bible and decide for ourselves what it means according to our own wishes.
You’re baiting a false narrative, namely that subsequent developments in linguistics make “he” a definitive translation and then you somehow ascribe some nefariousness to original translations.
This isn’t accurate and I’ll cite a source that you have apparently pointed yourself earlier:
“What’s the origin of the difference? Well, the original Hebrew of the passage allows for either reading; the gender is simply ambiguous, and allows for a he, she, or it reading.“
And
“Regardless of whether the human author of Genesis understood the passage in the “she/her” sense or the “he/him” sense, the ideas expressed by both readings are true. In the ultimate sense, Christ did crush the serpent’s head and was struck himself by the serpent, both.aspects of his death on the Cross. However, there is another sense in which Mary crushed the serpent’s head and in which she was struck at by the serpent. She didn’t do these things directly, but indirectly, through her Son and through her cooperation with her Son’s mission.
It was she, not someone else, who was the person that agreed to become the human channel through which Christ would enter the world in order to crush the serpent’s head (cf. Luke 1:38). And she was wounded when the serpent struck Jesus. Simeon had prophesied to her that “a sword will pierce through your own soul also,” a prophecy that was fulfilled when Mary saw her Son hanging from the cross (John 19:25–27). Thus Jesus directly crushed the serpent and was directly struck by the serpent, while Mary indirectly crushed it and was indirectly struck by it due to her cooperation in becoming the mother of Christ.
The fact both readings express theological truths is something Catholics have long noted.”
https://t.co/cNickRsW7S
The reason why we laugh at Protestants is not only because of their error…but also this sort of sophistry masquerading as intellect.
Protestantism truly is the Pre-K of Christianity…🤦🏻♂️
The immense joy seen in this 2 second clip turned into exultant tears moments later. I wept so much that I left a puddle on the kneeler at my pew. I will never ever be the same again. Jesus was with me!!! Happy almost Easter everyone. More from me tomorrow.
After a lapse of about 12 years I gave a full confession on Good Friday and at tonights Easter Vigil received the Eucharist as I returned to full communion with the Catholic faith
For as Christ was dead and now is risen; I was lost but now am found