@easyclapsz@ro_urubu A dreamina lançou globalmente hoje o seedance 2.5 1080p, o creaa já colocou 1 ano ilimitado se você pegar x plano, mas é bem carinho. Acho que tem outras plataformas.
@thsottiaux In the file sidebar, it would be great if it were possible to create files directly, rather than having to open the folder or use VS Code to create them.
Today we're rolling out Dreamina Seedance 2.5 in the U.S., and it's now available worldwide on CapCut.
The full model: 30 seconds from a single generation, up to 50 references, and precise edits to any part of a shot. Available across App, Web, and Desktop.
What will you create? Try it now.
RT+Comment in 4hr to get extra 1000 credit in your DM!
@thsottiaux In the app, I use the terminal, and when an error occurs, I have to select everything, copy it, and paste it. It would be great if it could recognize the red coloring or simply allow me to select the text and use a button to send it to the chat.
I love chatgpt Sol because is so powerful, I pay for the subscription since and with Sol I can, and created, and learn a bunch of projects and programming languages.
Or… what if we gave you $100 in Codex credits if you tell us what you love about GPT-5.6 Sol or why you switched?
Tweet it, claim your gift, enjoy more usage. First 10k get the free tokens!
https://t.co/8mU93eA13i
@thsottiaux I love chatgpt Sol because is so powerful, I pay for the subscription since and with Sol I can, and created, and learn a bunch of projects and programming languages. Tkss
@sama I built something I’d always wanted, a social galaxy app to register people from my circle, along with their details and put notes. Codex changed my life.
@rpdthelol@LukeberryPi N sei se é o Diretor, mas o Tibo fez um post agradecendo que muitas pessoas estavam usando o Codex e removeu temporariamente o limite de 5 horas e resetou o limite semanal tbm
Dear @TeamYouTube@YouTube@YouTubeCreators@nealmohan@UpdatesFromYT,
I am asking for help because I feel like I have been completely stonewalled. My channel, “ScalingStories,” was denied monetization for “inauthentic content,” but I cannot seem to get in contact with a real person who can fairly review my actual channel and explain what specifically needs to be fixed.
The responses I keep receiving feel like templated, copied-and-pasted replies that I have seen many other creators receive. I keep being directed back to the same guidelines, but I am not being given specific feedback about my content, my format, or my current channel. I cannot fix an issue if no real person will explain what the issue actually is.
My content shares a similar overall theme because I read and react to stories, but that does not mean the videos are mass-produced or repetitive. Each video is unique and different from the others. I read multiple different stories per video, and the topics of those stories vary widely. It is not the same story being barely changed over and over again, like “cheating story 1,” “cheating story 2,” and so on.
I also provide significant personal entertainment and educational commentary throughout the stories I read. I am not just reading something and adding a quick recap at the end. I give my input, thoughts, reactions, and perspective multiple times throughout each video, and viewers directly respond to that commentary in the comments. They react to my opinions, disagree with me, agree with me, joke with me, and engage with the personal perspective I add, which shows that my commentary is a meaningful part of the content, not an afterthought.
These videos are made for the enjoyment and education of my viewers. They are not solely pumped out for clicks and views. I put real effort, time, commentary, editing, and personal expression into my content, and I desperately want a real person or specialist to fairly review my channel.
Please help me get a fair review of ScalingStories.
Channel: https://t.co/4LoV0homqZ
#inauthenticcontent #youtube #youtubedemonetization #creatorsupport #youtubecreators #contentcreator #monetization #youtubepartner #fairreview #fixyoutube
I am feeling completely helpless. My channel, “ScalingStories” 125K+ subscribers, is something I have put my heart, time, and livelihood into.
@TeamYouTube@YouTube@YouTubeCreators@nealmohan@UpdatesFromYT
I have been fighting an “inauthentic content” flag, but my content is not mass-produced, repetitive, or low-effort. Every video is voiced by me, manually edited by me in DaVinci Resolve, and uses background footage recorded by me.
Each video takes me around 5–7 hours a day to make. I add my own thoughts, reactions, commentary, entertainment, and personal expression throughout my videos. I also use several custom-drawn avatars to better represent myself during talking segments and convey emotion to my viewers.
After I was removed from the YouTube Partner Program on January 27, 2026, I spent three months thoroughly reviewing the guidelines, overhauling my channel, changing my format, and deleting videos that may not have aligned with YPP policies. I rebuilt my channel from January 27 to April 27, 2026, because I wanted to do this the right way.
But I was denied again for the same “inauthentic content” policy and told I cannot reapply until July 27, 2026. The most frustrating part is that I feel like I am only getting generic responses instead of a real explanation from a human specialist. If the exact problem is not explained, how am I supposed to fix it?
I am asking for a fair, manual review of my current channel. Please do not let months of work, effort, and genuine content creation disappear into an automated loop.
Channel: https://t.co/4LoV0homqZ
#inauthenticcontent #youtube #youtubedemonetization #creatorsupport #youtubecreators #contentcreator #monetization #youtubepartner #fairreview
Hello @YouTube@TeamYouTube@YouTubeCreators,
I’m sorry to keep tagging you, but I believe my channel was falsely flagged for inauthentic content, and I am requesting assistance from a real human/specialist to manually review it.
I already tried appealing with a video explaining and showcasing my work behind the scenes, including webcam footage to show that I am a real and genuine creator. However, that appeal video still has 0 views, yet the appeal was ruled as confirmed inauthentic content. I believe this may have been done automatically by AI, and I urgently need a manual review by a real person.
Every video on my channel is voiced by me. All gameplay footage was also recorded by me. I provide significant commentary in my videos that adds entertainment and educational value. I also use numerous custom avatars to represent myself during talking segments and to express different emotions and tones to my viewers. None of my videos are mass-produced or repetitive. My viewers can clearly tell that each video is different.
I understand that you receive a large number of appeals and requests every day, and I am simply trying my best to be noticed as well by creating this post.
My channel: https://t.co/rfIa8AXk0M
Hello @YouTube@YouTubeCreators@TeamYouTube,
I am requesting that a real person or specialist review my channel’s partnership program status after I was recently denied monetization. I was cited for “inauthentic content,” which is described as: “Content that appears mass-produced or repetitive to increase views without adding significant educational or other value.”
My content is not mass-produced or repetitive to increase views, and it does add significant commentary, entertainment, and educational value. My videos are voiced by me and manually edited in DaVinci Resolve, which takes me around 5–7 hours a day. The gameplay is also played by me. I also use several custom-drawn avatars to better represent myself during my talking segments throughout my videos, helping me better express the emotions I am feeling and trying to convey to my viewers.
The only repetitive elements in my content are my intros and outros, which are allowed under your guidelines. Your guidelines state: “Examples of what is allowed to monetize, including but not limited to: Same intro and outro for your videos, but the bulk of your content is different.”
I explained all of this in my appeal video, which was said to be reviewed by a human reviewer. However, the appeal video is unlisted and still shows a view count of 0. Because of this, I do not believe anyone watched my video, yet my appeal was still denied and my content was confirmed as “inauthentic.”
I am being denied the chance to reapply to the YouTube Partner Program until July 27, 2026. That is not right or fair to me. I was previously removed from the program on January 27, 2026. During that time, I thoroughly reviewed my own channel and overhauled it, which included changing my format and deleting videos that may not align with the program’s policies. I spent three months, from January 27, 2026, to April 27, 2026, rebuilding my channel.
To be denied again for the same policy, “inauthentic content,” after I followed your guidelines and made sure my videos do not violate them, is soul-crushing. I believe my channel was not properly reviewed and may have been evaluated by AI. I am requesting that a real person or specialist speak with me and review my channel, as I am a genuine, passionate content creator who wants to be part of your program.
My channel: https://t.co/rb32nUNgtM
@FlorsheimE11807@flowersslop Mine has already updated in the app/web. I saw on the X that to check if it's working, try creating an image of Sam Altman; if it generates an image that matches him, it's the new model.