WAT!
Microsoft: "Unfortunately, console storage and memory prices have increased by more than 2.5x and we expect another doubling by the fall of 2027." $DRAM $MU
$MU Micron Chief Business Officer: Aggressive customer pricing during the 2023 memory downturn curtailed investment & worsened today’s supply tightness
"We told a couple of the customers who were being very aggressive with pricing at that time that this is not constructive. A lot of the industry investments got shut down in 2023 because of really poor pricing and really poor margins."
“If you haven't read hundreds of books, you are functionally illiterate, and you will be incompetent, because your personal experiences alone aren't broad enough to sustain you.”
— James N. Mattis
Samsung: a memory chip worker with a base salary of $52k is expected to receive a total bonus of around $410k this year
SK Hynix: employees are expected to receive bonuses of more than $454k
Luxury jewelry sales in S. Korea: +146% YoY
Luxury watch sales in S. Korea: +85% YoY
Satya out swinging against $MU and $SNDK
*MICROSOFT: XBOX CONSOLES PRICE WILL INCREASE BY $100 FOR 512 GB *MICROSOFT:CONSOLE STORAGE, MEMORY PRICES INCREASED BY OVER 2.5X *MICROSOFT: EXPECT ANOTHER DOUBLING BY THE FALL OF 2027
*MICROSOFT: CONSOLES ARE TYPICALLY NOT SOLD AT A PROFIT
$MSFT
$MU is gonna be 4,000 a share will correct to 2,000 a share and folks will come on here and say with an actual straight face “see I told you memory was cyclical” they will be right but they will also be fucking poor…
$mu with another reminder that memory makes the rest of the datacenter capex chain just look stupid now. At 40bl+ op income next quarter its outearning $aapl $goog $amzn $meta $msft meanwhile $amd been almost same mkt cap and they printed 1.5bl op incom last q. You really want to pay 70x 2028 fcf for optics suppliers when they are both competing against this return profile on the same theme and in the bom. Yes, it won't last for forever but in the case of some stocks the crowding out effect and rent capture is all that matters in this buildout cycle, and they are massive relative losers to this complex.
You may hate my $NFLX thesis, but you better respect it. $MU just announced it’s going to take everything from hyperscalers, those hyperscalers need to take everything from their customers.
That MU call must be depressing if you’re heavily long the hyperscalers. Selling a commodity at 90% margins (soon) that will be 1/5th the price in 3 years, but you have to buy it or you lose marketshare. And if you own Meta, Zuck doesnt need to be in this capital pissing context but decided to join.
$mu isn’t up because of the beat, it’s a multiple rerate based on the SLA’s that justifies giving it a higher multiple due to more certainty further out.
That said it benefits all of the long duration trade names which were getting hit into the numbers. I still favor $wolf above all others in this area
I find it hard to understand why some people are interpreting Micron’s latest LTA signing as the end of the memory price upcycle.
Signing an LTA ultimately means that the amount of supply in the market that has not yet been locked up is shrinking. In other words, the later a customer signs an LTA, the greater the pressure they face to secure stable supply, and the stronger their FOMO becomes.
Over time, the fear of failing to secure enough memory will only intensify. That creates an environment where memory makers can secure LTAs on increasingly favorable terms.
I do not think this LTA marks the end of price increases. If anything, I think it is closer to the beginning.