I’ve been warning about $VRA for a long time, and nothing i’ve seen lately has changed my mind.
first came the token migration.
then the shady CEO change.
those were the biggest red flags for me, and I warned my followers the moment they happened.
fast forward to today, and the focus has clearly shifted to $PLRL, while holders are still being encouraged to buy, hold and stake $VRA until 2027.
ask yourself one question.
if @verasitytech still the future, why does almost every major announcement revolve around a different token?
I decided to take a closer look at the new $PLRL website.
the first thing that stood out:
where’s the team?
there’s no visible leadership, no founders page, no advisors, no clear information about the people building the project. for a platform asking users to trust it with their data and participate in a tokenised ecosystem, I think transparency should come first.
then there’s the scope.
according to the website, $PLRL aims to power a privacy-first data vault, a content marketplace, an ai-powered advertising platform, creator licensing, tokenized data and more.
that’s an enormous vision.
and almost every section is marked “in development.”
to me, there’s a difference between shipping products and marketing a future ecosystem.
another thing that caught my attention is the language around “staking your data.”
it’s an interesting idea, but the website leaves important questions unanswered:
- how is that data valued?
- who is buying it?
- what creates sustainable demand?
- what gives the token long-term value?
those are questions every investor should be asking.
after watching the narrative move from $VRA to $PLRL…
I’m simply not willing to ignore these red flags.
I’ve been blocked by @VerasityTech for speaking critically before, but that doesn’t change my opinion.
do your own research. ask difficult questions.
that’s how you avoid becoming exit liquidity.. again.
@TXWestCapital Just joined you Chris on the founding members group coaching access. Looking forward to a great opportunity to learn from the experts of chart analysis and risk management!
@CryptoRyan17 You are 💯 on point with your comment there Ryan. Agenda = Conditioning = Narrative of mass conciousness. Government school teaches us dependancy on the state and how to live hand to mouth. Keep up the great work buddy!
Quick debrief before I head to bed.
The weakness on ETH VS BTC here is crystal clear, and I think it is a sign of things to come just like the scenario we saw at the 25k lows which I discussed at the time (here:https://t.co/HDNxnO8VrP) before BTC's monster rally and new impulse to 70k+ began.
Key things to note in the chart below that show signs of weakness on ETH VS BTC:
1. BTC has front-run its HTF demand by a couple hundred dollars while ETH has actually wicked through it.
2. BTC may be in the process of seeing a close back above the local swing low to it's left whereas ETH is clearly going to close below it.
What are the implications of this?
Imo, it's likely that $BTC is going to recover from this correction far more quickly than $ETH. For BTC, this move down looks like it's probably just a liq run/hunt into HTF demand and this will be further confirmed with a coming HTF closes (a close back above the swing low on our left would add weight to this idea).
Meanwhile on $ETH, this breakdown is much more significant, as we have actually wicked through our HTF demand and taken the lows under it- a technical break in market structure (whereas on BTC the HTF lows are not even close to being breached). At the same time, due to this market structure break and the strong breakdown, the RED ZONE at 3-3.5k will likely now act as a strong region of resistance on any moves to the upside.
My bet is that $BTC recovers from this correction relatively quickly and begins the next impulse up, while momentum on $ETH to the upside gets capped at the 3-3.5k region for some time, leading to a multi-week or multi month consolidation around this region as BTC climbs to new highs and 100k+, simultaneously sending BTC dominance surging for one final wave up and the ETH/BTC pairing down to my .03 ETH/BTC target that I have had for nearly 2 years now (here: https://t.co/3Gwmob6zcg).
That's it for tonight, will see how things look tomorrow and take it from there. If you'd like me to make a vid update tomorrow with more details, give this tweet a like/share :)
Many questions over the past day to why I thought the $TOTAL & $TOTAL 2 bottom was marked yesterday.
This is the video I released to the Patreon 7-Days ago.
I am releasing this free to view (20-Min Video) now as the manipulation has already happened.
RT if you appreciate it.
Elizabeth Warren has done more to hurt American competitiveness than any politician in the history of the United States of America. She is a hypocrite and a disingenuous troll. If you agree, please like or retweet and let’s get her out of office in November. It’s time.
@CryptoRyan17 For many years I worked in Management within the furniture retail industry and can categorically say that 'interest free credit' does NOT exist. It's always built into the product price as a subsidy. Nearly all customers though that 0% on the finance application section was real.
New Youtube video is now LIVE!
A $BTC whale gets hunted, bullish absorption, and 90k+ within a month?
Check it out below!
Likes/shares appreciated, enjoy 👇
https://t.co/wleGHh1g4g
It's worth noting that if the "ultra bull" scenario does play out, there are some significant implications. On one hand it means downside from current levels is extremely limited and the next leg up begins sooner rather than later.
At the same time, when we complete this extended 5th you need to be cautious about the pullback that will likely follow.
I am going to have to make a whole new video on this to explain but for now let's see if the ultra bull scenario DOES begin to play out (we will know in a couple days max) and then I can make a new update to follow. In the meantime, watch my latest update below for more on the "ultra bull" and other potential scenarios at play.
Isn’t it weird that there’s almost always news / real world events occurring near key levels? I don’t believe that real world events are “created” for the sake of markets per say, but I do believe headline timing is extremely suspicious if not outright intentional.
I’ve found news to often be nothing more than liquidity generating events. Stick with your plan you derived from the chart. Don’t let a couple tweets scare you. I used to adhere to news a lot more (cancelling orders etc). I found over time that this was almost always unnecessary. My original plan would have worked out just fine regardless of fearmongering or euphoric headlines.
$SOL
Here is a video for you all on Solana! It does have a setup on the weekly chart currently happening
Check it out - if you like these vids please like the post and re-post so I know to do more of them! 🙏