I think there's only so much power in that. The idea that you can always find sponsorship with companies aligned with you is nearly delusional. At the end of the day you have to be practical and understand that these companies aren't people. They have people working at them. Those people might align with you but that can end with one person being replaced in almost any circumstance.
We ought not play rainbow capitalism in response to failed rainbow capitalism. Instead I think it serves us all to be an example of how making simple changes can make easy solutions.
@Urban__Tree Do you think I came to bring peace on earth? No, I tell you, but division. From now on there will be five in one family divided against each other, three against two and two against three.
As a creator who's been on the end of a company dropping for mob reasons, what would it take to make you accept another deal with the same company? I think it would be advantageous for someone in your position to openly and clearly state those potential terms to show not just the people who follow you what your idea of a correction looks like, and also to have an open ended offer for companies to potentially see. It seems to me this would be a good situation for all involved.
@BriannaWu@JanHow64 Congratulations you have reached the end of the horseshoe. You demonstrate the exact same rhetoric at those you deem other that they direct at you. This is the cycle. You are painfully regular.
Would you elaborate on tangible change? I'm down to take your word on this but I'm curious what you asked for and what actually changed. I have no dog in the fight, I like the message you have I'm genuinely curious what constitutes change enough for you to be happy with them after the dropping nonsense.
@RandPaul Don't do this rand. It's a very obvious joke of Darth Vader bad so Darth Vader thinks flock good. I don't think very highly of many politicians, I do think pretty highly of you. Don't make us both look stupid here.