@bitads_ai Owner emissions are 6.5 TAO per day, yet the SN still posts AI slop. Only down from here, seems y’all didn’t learn the first time when you ran the SN to zero.
@const_reborn what do you think about the SNs that are burning ~100% of miner emissions for months?
an AI agent just dropped $250k to acquire bittensor subnet 97. not a human, not a DAO, an autonomous agent that now owns and operates revenue-generating infrastructure. TAO up 8.6% on ETF filings, market completely ignoring that AI agents can now be infrastructure owners with zero labor costs and 100% reinvestment. constantinople's revenue over the next 90 days determines if this is a milestone or a gimmick
@AlbertNaghel@bitads_ai Source of rewards doesn’t change the model, it just changes the funding rail.
If external actors drive traffic, take risk, and earn per conversion, that’s affiliate/CPA mechanics.
Token incentives are just subsidized CAC.
Was hyped to see what Subnet 16 @bitads_ai is building, but it feels more like Bit Affiliates 😅
Branded for performance marketers, yet clearly fits affiliate/influencer/blogger vibes.
If you’re an influencer though, Subnet 93 @Bitcast_network is a strong winner.
This sounds very adjacent to what @sportstensor is building.
If bots + code are the real edge on Polymarket, then the question isn’t “can programmers win” — it’s who controls the models.
Does a decentralized intelligence layer (like Sportstensor) compress this edge by democratizing signal + execution…
or does it supercharge the best operators even further?
Feels like we’re watching the market transition from “alpha hunting” → infrastructure wars.
Curious how @sportstensor + others in the space see this playing out. 👀
Programmers are klilling Polymarket. Fully automated $1M+/month.
They make $1M a month because they’re smarter and faster than everyone else.
This is already happening. Most people just don’t see it yet.
Everyone talks about “alpha”, narratives, insider info. But the real edge on Polymarket right now is code.
I used to think Polymarket was just another prediction casino.
I was wrong.
Programmers are deploying bots that scan markets every second, looking for mispriced probabilities, broken correlations, and structural inefficiencies humans simply can’t react to fast enough:
> When YES + NO costs less than $1 — they don’t hesitate.
> When correlated markets diverge — they hedge instantly.
> When spreads appear — they farm them thousands of times per day.
This arbitrage bot account made $250K in one month:
> https://t.co/nXiQhrCQ8r
This trader uses statistical arbitrage and made over $500K in a single month doing almost nothing:
> https://t.co/7mvILATrx9
This trader runs AI probability models and made $1M in one month:
> https://t.co/XKCMEemKqO
Some of these bots execute millions of trades. Programmers are simply more efficient than regular humans.
Have you already used code to trade on Polymarket?
Indeed I am quite hyped around the halving, and one of key reasons being that miners on each subnet are earning a ton currently.
With the halving cutting the emissions in half, this also means miners are making 2x less than they are making currently. So if a miner on a subnet constantly sells, whether converting into TAO or USD it will be significantly smaller amount.
In the case of Chutes, miners are getting 258.35 TAO per day (as of today) and lets not forget validators which are getting the same amount. That being cut in half, to me seems very bullish for dTAO and TAO in general.