One of the amusing things about women is that one will walk past a conversation that isn't about her, has nothing to do with her, and immediately interrupt it to say "Hey everybody! This does not sexually arouse me! In fact quite the opposite!"
And then she'll wonder why everyone seems to find that response incoherent.
It's only funny, however, until you truly understand why it's happening. Then it's kinda... existential.
Pick up a popular book, written by women, for women. At random. We all know that the odds are it's going to be porn.
In fact, it's gonna be porn about the medium-height, slightly clumsy, brown-haired protagonist girl being kidnapped and ravished by a werewolf pirate billionaire warlord. And if you're wondering what "ravished" means, it's like rape, but sexier.
So what's going on here? Why are modern women so porn-brained, and simultaneously so contemptuous of every actual male within their line of sight?
This actually all fits together quite neatly. Women are not lying. They are telling us the truth. They are telling us exactly how they feel about all the things they see. They're just not very good at introspection. So they don't know why they feel that way.
If we read their werewolf rape porn, we can immediately see what turns women on... men who have power over them.
And the reason that women are reading werewolf rape porn is that actual men who have power over them are in short supply, and there's not enough to go around. Desperate for male dominance, they are mainlining a hypernormal stimulus in fictional form.
This is also the reason women don't care about any harm they are doing to men with their newfound political and social power. To them, any man who doesn't have power over them, and especially a man who they have the power to hurt, is viscerally disgusting. He is an unperson, useless to them, and they don't care what he is experiencing.
This is why they try to hurt men in the first place. Because they resent the fact that they can. They want us to be powerful, invincible, untouchable, and they lash out in frustration when we aren't, seeking to punish us for being vulnerable instead.
Funny thing is, it's not even their fault. This is genetic programming, after all, not a choice. Ovaries want what they want.
The bit they don't quite understand, however, the bit they haven't thought through, is that this doesn't work with the whole "equality" thing. A man can be more powerful than you, or he can be an equal. Can't be both.
And, of course, men really do have power over women. Not only are they unable to defend themselves against us, they need us to feed, clothe, shelter and protect them. If we were collectively willing to take their civil rights away again, we could do so immediately.
Women's rights exist only when and where men say they do.
In the book 1984, which many women will be unfamiliar with because it doesn't contain any werewolf rape, George Orwell describes a process called "doublethink", which is defined as "sustaining two contradictory ideas by not ever thinking about both of them at the same time."
In this case, the two ideas are "make me equal to you in power throughout society at large", and "have so much more power in our personal relationship that I am unable to hurt you no matter what I say or do".
Eventually, men are simply going to have to come to a consensus over what to do about this, and decide which of these requests to fulfill.
We can either be liberals, and accept perpetual female contempt as the price of that, or we can be vilified as reactionaries, but have women love us again.
What is never going to happen is that you are never going to get a majority of women to see the contradiction here, and agree that this makes no sense.
Which means we are going to have to make this decision on our own.
@daviddunn177 You people are missing a big point here, he didn’t own a christian republican in a debate here, he owned a woman. Of course he would beat her intellectually.
It’s so funny that China is just spymogging us into irrelevancy because they learned that all you had to do was teach mid choid bitches a few party tricks and how to not act like a bitch and it outperforms western women by an order of magnitude & I don’t even like Asian women.
Hasan Piker pulled 250,000 live viewers on midterm night.. Nick Fuentes pulled 87,000.
They were the two biggest solo streamers covering the election, and Fuentes says the gap comes down to one thing.
Hasan, the far-left Twitch streamer who once said "America deserved 9/11," gets to stream on EVERY major platform.
Fuentes, the America First host, is stuck on Rumble because he's banned from YouTube, Instagram and TikTok.
How does the guy who says “America deserved 9/11” get to stay on every platform… IN AMERICA, while the other can’t.
@femwitness Lesbian, gay, trans man/women. Who gives a fuck, y’all are all creepy. All of your identities stem from the fact you’re sexually degenerate, ofc you guys are all unadjusted freaks.
Girls: We should be able to vote, work, and operate in society just like men can
Also girls: “when I’m at work, little boys should be made to listen to me so I don’t cry 😿 “
Truly I tell you we’re in the fakest, most unserious point of human history.
@Odetteforwomyn Girls: treat us as equals, we can work, vote, and operate in society just as good as guys can.
Also girls: Waaah little boys shouldn’t be able to make me (a grown woman btw) cry 😿
Truly we live in the most unserious timeline
BREAKING: 🇺🇸 A Democrat win in Georgia just flipped to Republican after officials found a memory card that was never counted.
The Republican was losing by 58 votes, and after the card was counted, he is now winning by 262.
Georgia's Secretary of State has opened an investigation.
@Store1980s@adius256@janhopis Calling me a fag while defending trans people is quite ironic. Saying guys should t hit girls is controversial in 26, you can disagree with me but don’t project your weird hobbies or shortcomings onto me.