🇺🇸 Congress just passed a bill that could force you to upload your ID or scan your face to use the internet.
It is called the KIDS Act, and almost nobody wants to vote against protecting children online.
That is exactly the problem.
Last week the House passed it 267 to 117. It bundles 14 digital safety bills together, anchored by a revised version of the Kids Online Safety Act.
The bill says it does not require age verification. It even includes a disclaimer saying so.
The catch is one clause away. Platforms get held liable if they "knew or should have known" a user was a minor.
That is a low bar. It means a regulator decides after the fact whether a company should have figured out someone was 15. No platform wants to gamble on that, so the safe move is to just verify everyone.
Here is where "protect the kids" quietly flips. To prove you are not a minor, you have to prove you are an adult. Driver's licenses, passports, or a facial scan to log on.
The net does not catch children. It catches all of us.
Then there is the security problem. Force millions of people to upload IDs everywhere, and somebody ends up sitting on a giant pile of passport scans and face data.
The Tea app showed how it goes. It required a selfie and a government ID, promised to delete them right after, and did not. In July 2025, about 13,000 of those IDs and selfies leaked onto 4chan, some still carrying GPS data that let someone map where users lived.
The KIDS Act would mandate that exact collection across the whole internet.
Kids do run into real harm online, and wanting to fix that is fair. But this fix builds a surveillance system that touches every adult. Rep. Thomas Massie called it a Trojan horse bill.
It now heads to the Senate. The real question is simple. Is protecting kids online worth building an internet where everyone has to prove who they are just to log on?
Source: EFF, ACLU, R Street Institute, NBC News, The Hill / Writer: Julie
America's most influential pediatric vaccine organization has been hit with a federal RICO lawsuit for operating a vaccine racketeering enterprise.
The American Academy of Pediatrics unlawfully deceived parents into injecting their children with large batteries of untested vaccines by issuing FRAUDULENT vaccine recommendations.
The AAP rakes in cash from Merck, Pfizer, and Moderna to push maximal vaccination for maximum profit, despite NO safety data on injecting 72 doses by age 18.
Even worse, NONE of the routine childhood vaccines were licensed based on a long-term, placebo-controlled trial.
I truly don’t understand this ruling, do you? Why would the Supreme Court rule that way especially when the evidence confirms it is true? So glad this son won his battle against this and that his Mom shared his story 🙏
“The picture on the left was my son after more than a gallon of glyphosate was tipped over his neck and shoulders during a work accident. This is why I won't stay quiet. My healthy, 6 ft 5, 18 year old son was taken down to 125 pounds after glyphosate seeped into his pores.
That picture? He'd turned a corner then. We all felt like he just might make it. We were celebrating. He could stand. He could get out of his hospital bed. He didn't want a picture taken at his worst - with no hair from rounds and rounds of chemo, looking more shrunken, bigger tumors. A few months before this left picture, he was at death's door, stage 4 lymphoma and the doctors didn't give us much hope he would live.
I'm one of the fortunate mothers. My son battled like a warrior. He survived and the right picture is him now. But there was a brutal seven year battle with all the alternative methods, all the chemo... so much that he became chemo resistant. Then when nothing else would stop the tumors from growing back, a stem cell transplant that wiped out his whole immune system in the hope it would restart. Many mothers.... many families are not so fortunate. They lost their loved one.
Last week the Supreme Court voted 7 to 2 that glyphosate didn't need a cancer warning. Monsanto won. Bayer won. Two of the largest companies in the world won against thousands of families. My son, our entire family and thousands of others families who have had glyphosate impact their lives felt this blow in our guts.
Eleven years ago the WHO announced it "probably causes cancer." We want the "probably" word gone. We want this monster named for who it is and what it does.
We lost the fight last week. But the battle will keep going. Mothers like me won't stop. Because we know.”
-Serene
The GOP is a disaster. The Republican Party hijacked MAGA, pretended to be America First and MAHA, and then sold us all out.
Then Trump rubber stamped the entire con job while taking checks from literally everyone.
America First needs to go 1776 on the Neocon Epstein controlled Republican Party and MAHA needs to burn the bridge to the fucking ground.
To sum up:
1) The federal government licenses injections on the basis of sham clinical trials lacking a genuine placebo or proper control groups.
2) The federal government then "recommends" these injections as guidance to the states.
3) The states then pass legislation to mandate said injections.
4) The federal government protects the injection makers and those who inject them from virtually all liability from any injuries and de@ths caused by the injections.
5) The federal government uses your tax dollars to purchase the $hots for "underprivileged" kids making the federal government the largest purchaser of the $hots.
6) The federal government places responsibility for monitoring the dangers of the injections with the same agency that promotes them.
7) The federal government owns patents on dozens of injections posing an inherent conflict of interest.
8) The federal government funds research to shore up the claim of safe and effective and ignore the mountain of independent science proving otherwise.
9) The federal government determines what qualifies as an injury and then vigilantly eliminates previously acknowledged injuries.
10) The federal government uses your tax dollars to set up a special court to adjudicate injuries and deaths and denies the vast majority of claims. These special courts allow no due process or discovery.
11) The federal government employs "Special Masters" instead of proper judges to adjudicate claims and pays guns for hire to defend the government programs all paid by your tax dollars.
12) When the injections k^ll a child, the state blames the parent(s), not the pharmaceutical product for the harm and arrests the parent(s).
So, parents who've already suffered an unimaginable tragedy are up against a govt court staffed by govt paid* special masters and attorneys with no due process defending a govt licensed and govt mandated product for which they blame the victims for harm.
(*Insert taxpayer funded.)
This is sums up the state of affairs in the US: the federal government licenses and promotes the products of private companies which the states mandate and which the federal government absolves of liability leaving Americans victims twice over when the products cause harm.
This is not freedom, this is not justice, this is not ethical or moral, it is crony capitalism at best and pure evil fascism at worst.
@theHFDF@uTobian@MaryBowdenMD@ChildrensHD@VacSafety@stkirsch@jeffreytucker@standforhealth1
🚨 BREAKING: @HHSGov has announced that @SecKennedy has signed determinations terminating the COVID-19 Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) declarations for drugs and biological products and for medical devices, concluding that the circumstances that justified these emergency authorities no longer exist.
Rockdale County resident who’s a sound engineering graduate shares shocking information on Data Centers
Data centers produce continuous low-frequency noise at <20 Hz, which is below normal human hearing. It’s comes from their mechanical cooling systems, power generators and more. It is extremely difficult to block and it travels through solid objects including walls, floors, even the ground
This continuous frequency causes permanent hearing damage, vestibular (balance) issues, elevated cortisol levels, stress, chronic fatigue, headaches, sleep disturbances, cardiovascular and respiratory problems, vibroacoustic disease that is thickening of heart structures and severe physical and psychological distress
The county is already facing a high mental health crisis and now these data centers will add to it with this low content frequency that no one can hear
This is extremely dangerous and something that is definitely going to impact the country nationally
If @ZachLahn wins the race for Iowa Governor, he will become the first Governor to call for the Covid shots to be pulled off the market. Please follow and support him, even if you don’t live in Iowa.
@phxnight@Mattforphoenix The pamphlet mentions systemic racism as a cause and 2030. That’s tells you everything you need to know. If you’re paying attention of course.
Yesterday’s Supreme Court decision reflects that the capture of government by big industry is nearly complete. It affirmed the right of chemical companies to injure, maim, and even kill you and your children with their pesticides, herbicides, etc., with near complete impunity.
This means you can expect increasingly toxic pesticides, herbicides, fungicides, rodenticides, etc., because the more toxic they are, the better they will kill weeds, pests, etc. And farmers that then use the most effective products, no matter how harmful to humans, will have a competitive advantage. The result will be that the farmer who adopts the most effective products (meaning most toxic) will have the largest crop yield. Other farmers, to compete, will then also be forced to adopt the more harmful product. With that, the race to the bottom has begun.
I expect that in the coming decades we will look back and wish to return to the “safer days” of glyphosate. So, bottom line: your government has abandoned you and your children. Think about this decision: 7 out of 9 Supreme Court judges sided with the chemical company against the public, and Trump’s DOJ intervened in the case on the side of the chemical company. Anyone who thinks this administration cares about you over industry profit is, at this point, delusional.
Shame on the DOJ, shame on the Trump admin, and shame on the Supreme Court for letting chemical companies get away with injuring, maiming, and killing Americans with their products instead of just allowing normal market forces to protect us and our children. Now, in addition to vaccines, we can add pesticides, etc., to the list of products that can injure and kill with near complete immunity.
Below is the decision and, in a nutshell, it holds that failure to warn claims brought under state law (which is the primary type of claim one would bring for harms from a pesticide, herbicide, etc.) are preempted by the EPA-approved label such that, if the harm is not on the label, your claim loses (since EPA didn’t add it to the label as a harm), and if the harm is on the label, your claim loses (since it has been disclosed on the label). Meaning heads or tail they win, and you and your children lose.
https://t.co/KGl3RCQqTt
Whoa! It's all coming out. None of this was improvised.
NIH internal emails reveal pandemic planning years before Covid, by @MaryanneDemasi https://t.co/FWUZy6drKo
I made a promise to the first Soldier of mine, who died from the COVID vaccine!
Anthony Fauci, M.D., holds an active medical license in Maryland (license number D0004034).
Here is a link to file a complaint against the medical license of a doctor in Maryland.
https://t.co/KAthMZCU1e
Maryland Medical Practice Act (Health Occupations Article, Title 14), which lists grounds for disciplinary action, including “immoral conduct” and “unprofessional conduct” in the practice of medicine.
Key Statutory Grounds (Health Occupations § 14-404)
A disciplinary panel may reprimand, probate, suspend, or revoke a license if a physician:
• Is guilty of immoral conduct or unprofessional conduct in the practice of medicine.
• Is professionally, physically, or mentally incompetent.
• Engages in other prohibited acts (e.g., fraud, patient abandonment, substance abuse, overutilization, false reports, etc.).
“Unprofessional conduct” is evaluated on a case-by-case basis by the disciplinary panel. It is not rigidly defined in statute but includes failures to meet standards of care, ethical violations, or behavior that harms patients or the profession.
Did the medical recommedations and guidance given by Dr Fauci acting in his offical capacity as the Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) brake your trust in the profession of medicine? Public health? The safety of vaccines?
Were you or your loved ones harmed by SARS-CoV-2 (gain of function bioweapon)?
Were you or your loved ones harmed by the COVID vaccine-bioweapon?
Did the health of you or your loved ones suffer because of proffesional medical opinions and guidance given by a medical professional acting in his/her offical professional medical capcity?
Did your business close because of the fabricated medical advice like 6 ft safe and masking?
Did your grandparents or parents die alone in a hospital because of the deadly Remdesivir protocol and or social distancing?
Did your mental health suffer from social isolation and stress?
Did your children struggle with depression, anxiety, and suicidal ideation secondary to the medical recommendations (social distancing, masks, school by Zoom, etc.) because of the "expert medical opinions and guidance" of a man acting in his official capacity for NIH?
Do you think it is "professional" for a medical doctor to use their position and taxpayer money to fund the development of a more lethal, more transmissible virus?
Do you think it is "professional" to lie to congress?
Do you think it is "professional" for a doctor to lie to the President of the United States about Public Health issues and measures?
Do you think it is "professional" for a doctor to spread lies about a vaccine's safety and efficacy that directly results in substantial harm to the health and readiness of our entire Armed Forces?
Actions have consequences—and incompetent/corrupt leaders— are deadly!!
My last conversation with the first soldier that died from the vax, he said, "I know the vaccine did this to me. I felt that poison go through my body. I was about to retire, and they took everything from me and my family. Make sure they are held accountable for what they did to me. Please make sure my wife is taken care of."
I have had conversations most in the military can't imagine. When "leaders" do things that kill my men and women...I take it personally. These men and women did NOT take an oath to be Fauci's "lab rats."
WHY DOES ANY DOCTOR INVOLVED IN THIS GLOBAL DECEPTION STILL HAVE A MEDICAL LICENSE?
@BrianneDressen@GenFlynn@samosaur@SenRonJohnson@SecKennedy@SenRandPaul@React19org
Yesterday was my final day as Director of National Intelligence. I declassified and released never-before-seen documents exposing the truth about Fauci directing millions of US taxpayer dollars to fund dangerous gain-of-function research at the Wuhan lab, worked with the Intelligence Community to suppress the truth about his actions and hide the virus’ lab-leak origins, and lied to Congress while under oath in 2024. It’s time you know the truth. Go to https://t.co/tVwWp0TxZ4 to see for yourself.
Every MAHA supporter needs to hear this:
Big Pharma has 500+ new mRNA shots in the pipeline.
And President Trump’s administration is still giving them legal liability shields.
“They want these shots to address any malady you can imagine.”
“Flu.”
“Hantavirus.”
“RSV.”
“Cancer.”
“It’s kind of ironic that from the people I speak with, the number one condition that we’re seeing after the Covid mRNA shots is cancer.”
“And now they want to introduce mRNA-based cancer vaccines.”
Leslie Manookian is calling on MAHA and health freedom supporters to organize and stop this mRNA “freight train.”
“It’s gonna be very hard to stop.”
“But we should do everything we can to try.”
“We’ve already got a Covid PREP Act declaration that doesn’t expire until 2030.”
“Now, we’ve got this narrow hantavirus PREP Act declaration.”
What do these PREP Act declarations do?
“They indemnify the manufacturers of the shots.”
“We already know that these mRNA products are dangerous.”
“But I think the reason it’s happening is because there are 577 registered mRNA therapeutics entering or about to enter clinical trials.”
“507 of those products are mRNA vaccines, so-called vaccines.”
“And unfortunately, we are funding it.”
“Our tax dollars are going to pre-purchase agreements with the corporations that are manufacturing these.”
“Mostly Moderna and Pfizer.”
“I cannot believe that the President is allowing this to happen when he promised to Make America Healthy Again.”
“So I’m calling on all of you to stand up and make your voices heard by contacting the White House and writing letters to your local newspapers.”
“We don’t want our tax dollars going to fund these corporations.”
“Or give them pre-purchase agreements and indemnify these companies.”
@LeslieManookian
A Japanese immunologist spent 20 years proving that the chemicals trees release into the air walk into your bloodstream, hunt down your stress hormones, and arm your immune system in ways no therapist or pharmaceutical has ever matched, and most of the data has been sitting in Japanese medical journals for two decades waiting to be translated.
His name is Qing Li.
He is a clinical professor at Nippon Medical School in Tokyo and the president of the Japanese Society of Forest Medicine. The Japanese government has been funding his research since 2004, and the body of work he has produced is the reason forest bathing is now an officially prescribed clinical therapy in Japan and Korea.
The story actually starts in 1982, when the Japanese Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries coined the term shinrin-yoku to describe the practice of slow, mindful walking in a forest. They did it for a practical reason.
Japan was urbanizing fast, stress-related illness was climbing, and the country had thousands of square kilometers of forest sitting unused. The idea was to give people a reason to walk into the trees... They had no idea what was actually happening to the human body during those walks until Qing Li ran the first proper experiment in 2005.
He took twelve healthy adult men on a three-day, two-night trip to a forest park. They walked for a few hours each day. Nothing strenuous. No prescribed routes or breathing exercises. They simply walked slowly through the trees, breathing the air, looking at the forest.
Li drew blood and urine samples before the trip, on the second day, on the third day, on day seven after returning home, and again on day thirty.
The numbers that came back from the lab were not what anyone expected.
The activity of a specific type of immune cell called the natural killer cell, which is the cell your body uses to hunt down cancer cells and virus-infected cells before they can spread, had jumped by roughly 50 percent during the forest trip. The actual number of natural killer cells circulating in the bloodstream had increased significantly.
Three different anti-cancer proteins that those cells produce, called perforin, granzymes, and granulysin, had all risen sharply. And the effect did not disappear when the men went home. The immune boost was still measurable on day seven and was still partially present on day thirty.
Two hours a day in a forest had upgraded the immune system for a full month.
Li ran the same experiment with women a year later and found nearly identical results. Then he ran it with a control group who took a three-day trip through an urban area with the same amount of walking, the same hotel quality, and the same diet.
The urban group showed no measurable change in natural killer cell activity at all. The forest was doing the work, not the vacation.
The mechanism turned out to be a class of airborne molecules called phytoncides. Trees produce these compounds to defend themselves against insects, bacteria, and fungi. Pine, cedar, oak, and cypress trees release them in particularly large amounts, especially in warmer weather and after rainfall.
When you walk through a forest, you are inhaling those molecules into your lungs and absorbing them through your skin, and once inside your body they appear to directly stimulate the production and activity of the very immune cells Li was measuring in his lab.
Roughly 50 percent of the health benefit of a forest walk, according to Li's data, comes from the chemistry of the air itself. The other half comes from what the forest is doing to your nervous system.
This is where it stops being only about the immune system and starts being about stress.
A separate Japanese research team measured cortisol, the body's main stress hormone, in 84 participants across 35 different forest sites. They drew samples before and after a 30-minute walk in each forest and compared them to control walks in matched urban environments. The cortisol levels of the people who walked in the forest were lower than the cortisol levels of the people who walked in the city by a significant margin. Their heart rates were lower. Their blood pressure was lower.
The activity of their parasympathetic nervous system, which is the part responsible for rest and recovery, had gone up. The activity of their sympathetic nervous system, which is the part that drives fight or flight, had gone down.
Then a researcher at the University of Michigan named MaryCarol Hunter ran the cleanest version of this experiment ever done. She recruited participants from a city and told them to take a nature pill three times a week for eight weeks.
They were free to choose the time, the place, and the duration of the nature experience, as long as it was outside, in daylight, and free of phones, conversations, and aerobic exercise. They sent her saliva samples before and after each session so she could measure cortisol changes accurately and rule out the normal daily drop in stress hormones that happens to everyone.
The result was that participants experienced a 21.3 percent drop in cortisol per hour spent in nature, with the biggest payoff happening between minutes 20 and 30 of the walk.
After that, the cortisol kept dropping, but more slowly. The threshold dose for measurable stress relief was just 20 minutes outside in something that looked and felt like nature.
What none of this means is that nature is a substitute for therapy or for medication when someone genuinely needs them. Therapy treats different things than a walk does, and Li himself has been careful in interviews to call forest bathing a complementary intervention rather than a replacement for clinical care.
But what the research has settled is that the human body has a physiological response to being among trees that operates on the same biological systems modern medicine is trying to reach with drugs and clinical protocols, and that response is fast, measurable, and free.
The strangest part of Li's work is the implication he keeps repeating in interviews. The average person now spends more than 90 percent of their life indoors. Their cortisol stays elevated. Their natural killer cells stay sluggish.
Their parasympathetic nervous system rarely gets a chance to take over. The system that was tuned by millions of years of life under a canopy of trees is being asked to run permanently inside a box made of drywall and screens.
Your body has not forgotten what it is supposed to do in a forest. It is waiting for you to walk into one.