Anayo paul orabufulani

Okanumee Uchechukwu @okanumeee27

1 day ago

0

3

2

0

76

Anayopaul4 retweeted

1 day ago

About 400 Nigeria Fulani Islamic Muslim Jihadists In Zamfara State, Planing The Next Attack On Christians While Christopher Musa The Chief Of Nigeria Terrorists Military Is Busy Walking Around In BiafraLand. @netanyahu @POTUS @TrumpDailyPosts @PeteHegseth @TheJusticeDept @FBI

1

46

38

3

1K

Anayopaul4 retweeted

AmicableAdaDrNgoziOrabueze @AmicableAdxc

1 day ago

This is exactly what Biafrans are going through.

0

44

30

1

471

Anayopaul4 retweeted

1 day ago

ARE THESE NOT DOUBLE STANDARDS BY THE USA 🇺🇸 TOWARDS NIGERIA 🇳🇬? Dear @SecRubio, @SusieWiles @SecWar In the case of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and his wife, the United States acted swiftly. On 3 January 2026, U.S. forces carried out a military operation in Caracas, captured Maduro and his wife, and brought them to the United States to face charges in U.S. courts. Maduro made his first court appearance on 5 January 2026. The United States was prepared to use extraordinary force and take decisive action in that case. Yet, on the other hand, the same U.S. Government and U.S. courts appear to have dragged their feet concerning President @officialABAT of Nigeria over allegations relating to cocaine and drug trafficking across the Atlantic. Why does this remain a hide-and-seek game between the FBI and the U.S. courts? ARE THESE NOT DOUBLE STANDARDS? Why was there such urgency and decisive action in the Maduro case, while the Nigerian case appears to move at a completely different pace? I ask @SecRubio: Is justice truly equal, or does it depend on who is involved?

mats56455's tweet photo. ARE THESE NOT DOUBLE STANDARDS BY THE USA 🇺🇸 TOWARDS NIGERIA 🇳🇬?

Dear @SecRubio, @SusieWiles @SecWar

In the case of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and his wife, the United States acted swiftly. On 3 January 2026, U.S. forces carried out a military operation in Caracas, captured Maduro and his wife, and brought them to the United States to face charges in U.S. courts. Maduro made his first court appearance on 5 January 2026.

The United States was prepared to use extraordinary force and take decisive action in that case.

Yet, on the other hand, the same U.S. Government and U.S. courts appear to have dragged their feet concerning President @officialABAT of Nigeria over allegations relating to cocaine and drug trafficking across the Atlantic.

Why does this remain a hide-and-seek game between the FBI and the U.S. courts?

ARE THESE NOT DOUBLE STANDARDS?

Why was there such urgency and decisive action in the Maduro case, while the Nigerian case appears to move at a completely different pace?

I ask @SecRubio: Is justice truly equal, or does it depend on who is involved?

17

323

251

7

4K

1 day ago

0

5

1

0

61

Anayopaul4 retweeted

1 day ago

Dear Africa /World LET THE FACTS SPEAK I sat down for coffee in Finland with a former Member of Parliament of Finland and we discovered this in our discussion. He was shocked about Nigeria - 🇫🇮 FINLAND 🇫🇮 VS NIGERIA 🇳🇬 Finland has a population of about 5.6 million and recorded approximately 58,267 deaths in 2024, around 160 (natural and accidents deaths) per day. Nigeria, with a population of about 230 million, recorded an estimated 2.67 million deaths (terror instigated by jihadists , natural deaths , accidents ) in 2024 , approximately 7,300 deaths every day. That means Nigeria you 46 times more likely to die deaths per year than Finland, largely reflecting the enormous difference in population size. But due to security situation in Finland less pollution from generation you survive daily in Finland . These figures put the discussion into perspective when comparing the two countries. The chances of being killed by Jihadist in Nigeria are are higher than in Finland I LEAVE IT HERE @alexstubb

mats56455's tweet photo. Dear Africa /World

LET THE FACTS SPEAK

I sat down for coffee in Finland with a former Member of Parliament of Finland and we discovered this in our discussion. He was shocked about Nigeria -

🇫🇮 FINLAND 🇫🇮 VS NIGERIA 🇳🇬

Finland has a population of about 5.6 million and recorded approximately 58,267 deaths in 2024, around 160 (natural and accidents deaths) per day.

Nigeria, with a population of about 230 million, recorded an estimated 2.67 million deaths (terror instigated by jihadists , natural deaths , accidents ) in 2024 , approximately 7,300 deaths every day.

That means Nigeria you 46 times more likely to die deaths per year than Finland, largely reflecting the enormous difference in population size.

But due to security situation in Finland less pollution from generation you survive daily in Finland .

These figures put the discussion into perspective when comparing the two countries.

The chances of being killed by Jihadist in Nigeria are are higher than in Finland

I LEAVE IT HERE @alexstubb

25

350

234

7

5K

1 day ago

We the #USB people are very happy for the good work you do.GOD BLESS YOU sir for standing on the truth 🙌

1 day ago

FINLAND VS SIMON EKPA Today, I arrived home safely after the conclusion of the Simon Ekpa case in Finland. European democracy is strange because if I had been in Nigeria I would have been thrown in River Niger for opposing the President but in Finland we told @alexstubb on his soil .I hope he has now seen the truth about Nigeria 🇳🇬. I also thank some of Opposition Members of Finnish Parliament whom we share 4 hrs over coffee and a lot of information regarding Nigeria . My public statements speak volumes, and I want to sincerely thank the Defence Lawyer Tommi for the cooperation we had throughout this case. My tactical headquarters in Helsinki also played an important role in supporting the work.However, it is too early to CELEBRATE We still have to hear the verdict, which is expected next month,September 2026. Whatever verdict comes, I now have a HUGE TASK ahead of me: “to move to the European Court of Human Rights as an interested party in the case, where possible under the applicable procedures, to pursue the issues surrounding Simon Ekpa’s case and to protect his name and reputation worldwide.” The job is huge. It is not over until it is over between me and Finland.Whatever comes, I will continue to stand firmly on the principles of the European Convention on Human Rights. EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS , KEY ARTICLES WERE VIOLATED ARTICLE 5 — RIGHT TO LIBERTY AND SECURITY No arbitrary detention. A person deprived of liberty must have a lawful basis, and detention must be subject to judicial review. ARTICLE 6 — RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL Independent and impartial tribunal; fair hearing; presumption of innocence; adequate defence rights; right to examine evidence and witnesses. ARTICLE 7 — NO PUNISHMENT WITHOUT LAW No one can be convicted for an act that was not a criminal offence when it was committed. ARTICLE 8 — RIGHT TO PRIVATE AND FAMILY LIFE Protection of private life, family life, home and correspondence. Interference must have a lawful and necessary justification. ARTICLE 10 — FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION Protects the right to hold opinions and to receive and communicate information and ideas. Restrictions must be prescribed by law and necessary in a democratic society. ARTICLE 11 — FREEDOM OF ASSEMBLY AND ASSOCIATION Protects peaceful assembly and association. Restrictions must be lawful and necessary in a democratic society. ARTICLE 13 — RIGHT TO AN EFFECTIVE REMEDY A person whose Convention rights have been violated must have an effective remedy before a national authority. ARTICLE 14 — PROHIBITION OF DISCRIMINATION Convention rights must be secured without discrimination, including on grounds such as political or other opinion. ARTICLE 15 — DEROGATION IN TIME OF EMERGENCY Even during a public emergency, derogation from Convention rights is subject to strict conditions. Certain rights cannot be derogated from. ARTICLE 17 — PROHIBITION OF ABUSE OF RIGHTS The Convention cannot be used to justify destroying or excessively limiting the rights and freedoms it protects. ARTICLE 18 — LIMITATION ON USE OF RESTRICTIONS Restrictions on Convention rights must not be applied for a purpose other than the purpose for which they were prescribed. FOR A “RED-FLAG” / SECURITY CASE The most important combination is: ARTICLE 5 — Liberty ARTICLE 6 — Fair Trial ARTICLE 7 — No Punishment Without Law ARTICLE 8 — Private Life ARTICLE 10 — Freedom of Expression ARTICLE 11 — Assembly & Association ARTICLE 13 — Effective Remedy ARTICLE 14 — Non-Discrimination ARTICLE 18 — Misuse of Restrictions These are the principles that I will continue to examine as the legal process moves forward. The fight for justice does not end with one verdict. The job continues. Dr. David Nyekorach-Matsanga Founder & Chairman Pan African Forum Ltd & Associates Pan-Africanist | Peacemaker | International Law Expert | Conflict Resolution Expert | Political Scientist | Investigative Journalist HEAD OFFICE :LONDON UK 🇬🇧

mats56455's tweet photo. FINLAND VS SIMON EKPA

Today, I arrived home safely after the conclusion of the Simon Ekpa case in Finland. European democracy is strange because if I had been in Nigeria I would have been thrown in River Niger for opposing the President but in Finland we told @alexstubb on his soil .I hope he has now seen the truth about Nigeria 🇳🇬.

I also thank some of Opposition Members of Finnish Parliament whom we share 4 hrs over coffee and a lot of information regarding Nigeria .

My public statements speak volumes, and I want to sincerely thank the Defence Lawyer Tommi for the cooperation we had throughout this case.

My tactical headquarters in Helsinki also played an important role in supporting the work.However, it is too early to CELEBRATE

We still have to hear the verdict, which is expected next month,September 2026.

Whatever verdict comes, I now have a HUGE TASK ahead of me:

“to move to the European Court of Human Rights as an interested party in the case, where possible under the applicable procedures, to pursue the issues surrounding Simon Ekpa’s case and to protect his name and reputation worldwide.”

The job is huge.

It is not over until it is over between me and Finland.Whatever comes, I will continue to stand firmly on the principles of the European Convention on Human Rights.

EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS , KEY ARTICLES WERE VIOLATED

ARTICLE 5 — RIGHT TO LIBERTY AND SECURITY

No arbitrary detention. A person deprived of liberty must have a lawful basis, and detention must be subject to judicial review.

ARTICLE 6 — RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL

Independent and impartial tribunal; fair hearing; presumption of innocence; adequate defence rights; right to examine evidence and witnesses.

ARTICLE 7 — NO PUNISHMENT WITHOUT LAW

No one can be convicted for an act that was not a criminal offence when it was committed.

ARTICLE 8 — RIGHT TO PRIVATE AND FAMILY LIFE

Protection of private life, family life, home and correspondence. Interference must have a lawful and necessary justification.

ARTICLE 10 — FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION

Protects the right to hold opinions and to receive and communicate information and ideas. Restrictions must be prescribed by law and necessary in a democratic society.

ARTICLE 11 — FREEDOM OF ASSEMBLY AND ASSOCIATION

Protects peaceful assembly and association. Restrictions must be lawful and necessary in a democratic society.

ARTICLE 13 — RIGHT TO AN EFFECTIVE REMEDY

A person whose Convention rights have been violated must have an effective remedy before a national authority.

ARTICLE 14 — PROHIBITION OF DISCRIMINATION

Convention rights must be secured without discrimination, including on grounds such as political or other opinion.

ARTICLE 15 — DEROGATION IN TIME OF EMERGENCY

Even during a public emergency, derogation from Convention rights is subject to strict conditions. Certain rights cannot be derogated from.

ARTICLE 17 — PROHIBITION OF ABUSE OF RIGHTS

The Convention cannot be used to justify destroying or excessively limiting the rights and freedoms it protects.

ARTICLE 18 — LIMITATION ON USE OF RESTRICTIONS

Restrictions on Convention rights must not be applied for a purpose other than the purpose for which they were prescribed.

FOR A “RED-FLAG” / SECURITY CASE

The most important combination is:

ARTICLE 5 — Liberty

ARTICLE 6 — Fair Trial

ARTICLE 7 — No Punishment Without Law

ARTICLE 8 — Private Life

ARTICLE 10 — Freedom of Expression

ARTICLE 11 — Assembly & Association

ARTICLE 13 — Effective Remedy

ARTICLE 14 — Non-Discrimination

ARTICLE 18 — Misuse of Restrictions

These are the principles that I will continue to examine as the legal process moves forward.

The fight for justice does not end with one verdict.

The job continues.

Dr. David Nyekorach-Matsanga
Founder & Chairman
Pan African Forum Ltd & Associates
Pan-Africanist | Peacemaker | International Law Expert | Conflict Resolution Expert | Political Scientist | Investigative Journalist
HEAD OFFICE :LONDON UK 🇬🇧

159

996

562

44

13K

0

4

2

0

74

Anayopaul4 retweeted

1 day ago

FINLAND VS SIMON EKPA Today, I arrived home safely after the conclusion of the Simon Ekpa case in Finland. European democracy is strange because if I had been in Nigeria I would have been thrown in River Niger for opposing the President but in Finland we told @alexstubb on his soil .I hope he has now seen the truth about Nigeria 🇳🇬. I also thank some of Opposition Members of Finnish Parliament whom we share 4 hrs over coffee and a lot of information regarding Nigeria . My public statements speak volumes, and I want to sincerely thank the Defence Lawyer Tommi for the cooperation we had throughout this case. My tactical headquarters in Helsinki also played an important role in supporting the work.However, it is too early to CELEBRATE We still have to hear the verdict, which is expected next month,September 2026. Whatever verdict comes, I now have a HUGE TASK ahead of me: “to move to the European Court of Human Rights as an interested party in the case, where possible under the applicable procedures, to pursue the issues surrounding Simon Ekpa’s case and to protect his name and reputation worldwide.” The job is huge. It is not over until it is over between me and Finland.Whatever comes, I will continue to stand firmly on the principles of the European Convention on Human Rights. EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS , KEY ARTICLES WERE VIOLATED ARTICLE 5 — RIGHT TO LIBERTY AND SECURITY No arbitrary detention. A person deprived of liberty must have a lawful basis, and detention must be subject to judicial review. ARTICLE 6 — RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL Independent and impartial tribunal; fair hearing; presumption of innocence; adequate defence rights; right to examine evidence and witnesses. ARTICLE 7 — NO PUNISHMENT WITHOUT LAW No one can be convicted for an act that was not a criminal offence when it was committed. ARTICLE 8 — RIGHT TO PRIVATE AND FAMILY LIFE Protection of private life, family life, home and correspondence. Interference must have a lawful and necessary justification. ARTICLE 10 — FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION Protects the right to hold opinions and to receive and communicate information and ideas. Restrictions must be prescribed by law and necessary in a democratic society. ARTICLE 11 — FREEDOM OF ASSEMBLY AND ASSOCIATION Protects peaceful assembly and association. Restrictions must be lawful and necessary in a democratic society. ARTICLE 13 — RIGHT TO AN EFFECTIVE REMEDY A person whose Convention rights have been violated must have an effective remedy before a national authority. ARTICLE 14 — PROHIBITION OF DISCRIMINATION Convention rights must be secured without discrimination, including on grounds such as political or other opinion. ARTICLE 15 — DEROGATION IN TIME OF EMERGENCY Even during a public emergency, derogation from Convention rights is subject to strict conditions. Certain rights cannot be derogated from. ARTICLE 17 — PROHIBITION OF ABUSE OF RIGHTS The Convention cannot be used to justify destroying or excessively limiting the rights and freedoms it protects. ARTICLE 18 — LIMITATION ON USE OF RESTRICTIONS Restrictions on Convention rights must not be applied for a purpose other than the purpose for which they were prescribed. FOR A “RED-FLAG” / SECURITY CASE The most important combination is: ARTICLE 5 — Liberty ARTICLE 6 — Fair Trial ARTICLE 7 — No Punishment Without Law ARTICLE 8 — Private Life ARTICLE 10 — Freedom of Expression ARTICLE 11 — Assembly & Association ARTICLE 13 — Effective Remedy ARTICLE 14 — Non-Discrimination ARTICLE 18 — Misuse of Restrictions These are the principles that I will continue to examine as the legal process moves forward. The fight for justice does not end with one verdict. The job continues. Dr. David Nyekorach-Matsanga Founder & Chairman Pan African Forum Ltd & Associates Pan-Africanist | Peacemaker | International Law Expert | Conflict Resolution Expert | Political Scientist | Investigative Journalist HEAD OFFICE :LONDON UK 🇬🇧

159

996

562

44

13K

Ofer Binshtok - Kafir - עופר בינשטוק

1 day ago

0

11

4

0

180

Anayopaul4 retweeted

@Ofer_binshtok

2 days ago

I stand with the Christians of Nigeria and support their right to an independent state, with a strong and substantial army so they can defend themselves against the Muslim terrorism that hits them constantly. It amazes me that part of the Christian community around the world supports Muslims when their brothers in the faith are being slaughtered by them throughout history, including today.

28

384

178

8

11K

Anayopaul4 retweeted