Anne Horn

[Diana Alastair💚🤍💜 ⚢ ❌❌✡️ @sappholives83]

Six of these ten Highland Councillors voted to allow a taxi driver who raped a passenger to keep his operator’s license — even though senior police officers urged them not to.

Please note that although we’re constantly told it’s women who grease the wheels for rapists, every single councillor who voted in rapist David Brown’s favor is a man. Take a good look at them, Scottish women: these 6 men would put you, alone and unwarned, in a taxi with a man who has already raped at least one passenger.

Brown has been put on the register for life; he raped an 18 year old girl and dumped her outdoors on a sub-zero January night in the Scottish Highlands; but these 6 men - Chris Birt, John Grafton, Ruraidh Stewart, Sean Kennedy, Willy MacKay, and Duncan MacPherson - are more concerned about his finances than they are about the safety of local women.

https://t.co/Rq2jzLJ9P3

[Rebel Ada @DearRebelAda]

We are all Julia Hartley-Brewer:

HW: “People like you shouldn’t get too involved in medicine, because of the harm you cause”.

JHB: “People like you, and I mean this very respectfully, should be in prison. Genuinely”.

[Danny conlin @dannyconlin76]

Please share this guys, it need a to be stopped 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿

[Integral Views @Integral_Views]

I am furious about this to a degree that it's hard to express.

This is important.

Shabana Mahmood is laying out plans for more asylum seekers to come to the UK using a 'Community Sponsorship Scheme' but very few people know what this entails.

I am so angry not just for the reasons that are clearly obvious to everyone but also due to the fact that this was all laid out in the Fabian Society's publication 'Lawful & Fair' in June 2023. Keep in mind that almost our entire cabinet are Fabians including Shabana.

It says: '“In addition, the UK should create a single ‘community welcome’ route to enable communities to sponsor refugees. The UK Refugee Service would be responsible for administering a single, uncapped, additional, sponsorship route. This community welcome route would allow citizen groups (including faith, charity and community groups as well as universities and employers) to sponsor refugees, building on existing schemes including the community sponsorship scheme and the Homes for Ukraine scheme, but not restricted to any particular nationality. Sponsorship also has the benefit of injecting community voice into the system and improves integration outcomes.”

This means that, for example, Mosques could make use of that uncapped sponsorship route to bring in as many 'asylum seekers' as they choose to sponsor. No doubt with shady foreign funding. Then the government would call that 'integration' because they had integrated into the Muslim 'community'.

And it says:

“A community-based welcome strategy would fit and move in lockstep with a new national refugee policy (for example, requiring a minimum level of refugee resettlement in all local authorities) and with a single community welcome sponsorship scheme for all nationalities, as outlined above, but encompassing all new arrivals.”

Got that? 'A minimum level of refugee resettlement in all local authorities'.

The document also makes the case for:
- The right to work for all asylum seekers after 6 months
- Making all kinds of migrants including asylum seekers British Citizens as soon as possible
- Building an industry out of asylum seeking within a 'UK Refugee Service' with 1,000 staff
- An online portal for applications from Afghanistan, Libya, Syria, Yemen, etc
- Speeding up approvals and blanket approving claims from certain countries

What this means, as is so clearly obvious to us all is that this government, from before its first day in office has been following a playbook that has been decades in the making.

They are not listening. They are not reacting to events or changing course based on evidence. They are locked in and utterly convinced of their righteousness. They simply do not care what you think or what evidence exists.

This is echo chamber thinking at its worst. Groups convincing themselves that they are correct and then gradually, collectively working their way into positions of leadership in order implement their master plan.

I covered this 'Lawful & Fair' document in quite some detail in a youtube video last year. I'll link that in the comments.

The Fabian Society is not just a think tank. It's a network. A belief system. A cult.

This will be looked back on and studied in the future as a political disaster of civilisational proportions. That's if it's us that get to write the history books.

I'm utterly disgusted by what our political system has produced. Tone deaf, ill informed, philosophically infantile, economically illiterate, virtue signaling dim wits.

[Emma @MrsEmmaWebber]

Barnaby Philip John Webber
11/01/2004-13/06/2023 💔

If you can, share these images of the beautiful soul stolen from us by the worst of humanity.

Let his face today burn bright.
Barney, I promise you there will be accountability 💛💚

For You. For Grace. For Ian.

[Jill Foster @JournalistJill]

Remember, every person who says they are disgusted by the Supreme Court judgment is admitting that:

They’re disgusted that female sexual assault survivors might meet in a support group to open up about their trauma, without men being present.

They’re disgusted that lesbians can socialise exclusively with other lesbians, without men being present.

They’re disgusted by new mothers gathering together to discuss breastfeeding or post partum problems, without men being present.

They’re disgusted that girls can play sport with other girls and shower, change and dress, without boys being present.

They’re disgusted that organisations - which realise they are too male dominated - can’t fill any female quotas with other men.

They’re disgusted that vulnerable female prisoners and arrestees can’t be searched by men or kept in a cell with other men.

They’re disgusted that women can have their own things.

They’re disgusted by the Equality Act 2010.

They’re disgusted by the law.

Isn’t that disgusting?

[Stuey Beef 🇬🇧🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 @stuey_beef]

Valdo Calocane was under NHS mental health care for two years before he killed Barnaby Webber, Grace O’Malley-Kumar and Ian Coates.

During those two years he was sectioned four times under the Mental Health Act.

Clinicians warned he might kill someone.

He was discharged nine months before the murders — because staff said they “could not locate him.”

A warrant for his arrest was issued in September 2022 after he failed to appear in court for assaulting another man.

Police had nine months to execute that warrant.
They didn’t.
He remained at large.

On 13 June 2023, he stabbed three people to death and drove into three more.

The public inquiry that concluded its oral evidence this week heard from 164 witnesses over 14 weeks.

It confirmed what the families have known for three years: this was not bad luck.

The former chief constable of Nottinghamshire Police admitted that Calocane “should have been apprehended prior to the killings.”

Police leadership acknowledged “a serious, systemic and operational failure.”

The policing oversight body’s own director general conceded they had “let down” the families.

And then the criminal justice system compounded every failure before it.

The CPS accepted a manslaughter plea on grounds of diminished responsibility.

The man who stabbed three people to death in broad daylight — a man four independent psychiatrists examined, and whom the sentencing judge accepted had known he was committing crimes — was sent to a hospital, not a prison.

Emma Webber stood at a press conference today and called it what it is: “an undoubted miscarriage of justice.”

She is right.
Her son is dead.

Calocane is in a hospital ward.

Nobody has been held to account.

And the inquiry’s findings — the ones that might finally name individuals and institutions — won’t be published until spring next year.

She has demanded a meeting with the Prime Minister, the Attorney General, the Home Secretary, the Health Secretary and the justice minister within the next month.

The least they can do is say yes.

[Orla Minihane @orlaminihane]

This is Lucy Stemp from Tonbridge in Kent. She is missing in Paris. No one has heard from her in a week. Her family are desperate to locate her. The police and interpol are involved. Please share. @pinkladies_uk

[James Melville 🚜 @JamesMelville]

The Great British net zero con-trick of Drax.

The Labour government is trying to force through an extension that would give Drax an estimated £1.8bn in taxpayer funded subsidies on top of the £11bn it has already received.

Drax has burned an amount of wood equivalent to 300 million trees. Burning wood creates 18% more CO2 emissions than coal.

And here’s the con trick: Drax is a sneaky way of exporting our CO2 emissions. We pay billions of pounds to cut down ancient forests in the US and Canada, ship the wood across the Atlantic in diesel tankers, then burn it in a Yorkshire-based power station.

And here’s the kicker - the CO2 emissions tally is not counted against the country that burns it, but the country that grows it. So Drax emissions are counted against the countries who grow and export the wood for Drax - like Canada and USA…not UK who burn it. So the UK can reduce CO2 figures by importing the burning wood grown elsewhere.

A gigantic net zero con-trick.

[Diana Alastair💚🤍💜 ⚢ ❌❌✡️ @sappholives83]

#IStandWithSallGrover

Pass it on.

[Anne Horn @AnneMHorn]

#IStandWithSallGrover

[Stephanie Bastiaan @stephbastiaan]

The Full Federal Court has handed down its judgement in Giggle v Tickle.

In a shock to women across the country - Sall Grover not only lost her appeal, the Court set aside the original finding of indirect discrimination and replaced it with direct discrimination, upholding Tickle's cross-appeal.

The damages were doubled from $10,000 to $20,000.

It’s important to note the Court expressly said it was only applying the Sex Discrimination Act as it is written- it is "not empowered to give effect to its own view" about whether that law is desirable.

In 2013, @JuliaGillard’s @AustralianLabor government amended the Sex Discrimination Act- stripping the meaning out of "man" and "woman" and adding gender identity as a protected attribute to be pitted against biological sex.

Today's outcome is proof of what those amendments have done: women are left with no meaningful rights or recognition under the Sex Discrimination Act - a bitter irony, given that protecting women was the very purpose of the Act under our commitment to CEDAW.

In my opinion, this is a verdict on the law, not on Sall. The judges found that the law - as that government amended it - left them no other conclusion.

These amendments must be repealed.
The Sex Discrimination Act must once again recognise biological reality and protect women's right to single-sex spaces.

What a dark and devastating day for Australian women and girls.

#RepealTheSDA2013 #IStandWithSallGrover
#GigglevTickle
#Auspol

[Jim Chimirie 🇬🇧 @JChimirie66677]

@AngelaRayner, a few questions your statement does not answer.

Tax Policy Associates, one of the most respected independent tax bodies in the country, states it cannot understand why HMRC decided not to charge a penalty. Both of your advisers explicitly told you to obtain specialist tax advice before completing the transaction. You did not obtain it. Independent experts say a penalty of approximately 20 percent was the likely and legally correct outcome under Schedule 24 of the Finance Act 2007. HMRC reached a different conclusion without explaining why. Do you believe HMRC reached the correct conclusion and if so can you explain why two independent expert bodies disagree?

You state you had no personal financial interest in the trust set up for your son. The trust was funded in part by NHS compensation money awarded for your son's care. You sold your remaining stake in your Ashton constituency home to that trust for £162,500 in January 2025 and used those proceeds as a deposit on an £800,000 flat in Hove. How do you define no personal financial interest in that transaction?

A £50,000 donation to the Office of Angela Rayner Limited from Refrigeration House Limited arrived on 24 March 2026, described as towards staffing costs and declared on the parliamentary register. Weeks later you paid the £40,000 stamp duty bill. Who owns Refrigeration House Limited, what is their connection to you, and was any part of that donation used directly or indirectly to meet the stamp duty liability?

You say politicians should be held to high standards. The questions above are what high standards look like in practice. They deserve answers.

[Diana Alastair💚🤍💜 ⚢ ❌❌✡️ @sappholives83]

A recent study found that 94% of Canada’s trans-identifying inmates didn’t come out as transgender until after they were arrested. The same study also found that trans-identifying male inmates are 5x more likely to be sex offenders than other male inmates. Locking these men in women’s prisons is a violation of international law and every legitimate human rights organization should say so.

[Alvin Foo @alvinfoo]

What an incredible human!

Jordan Adams just ran the London marathon with a 25kg fridge strapped to his back to raise money for frontotemporal dementia.

He ran alongside his brother.

The fridge represents the invisible weight people carry that nobody else can see.

Their mum Geraldine was diagnosed with FTD at just 47.

She's one of 12 family members they've lost to the disease.

Two years after losing her, both brothers found out they carry the MAPT gene mutation.

A 99.9% chance they'll both be diagnosed with FTD themselves. They'll likely become symptomatic in their early 40s.

Today they're in Ireland beginning 32 more marathons across all 32 counties together.

They've already raised nearly £500,000. 
They want to reach a million.

[Anna Maria Junus @JunusAnna]

When a woman is given a sentence to be served in prison, it does not include as part of that sentence rape by males.

When a man is given a sentence to be served in prison, it does not come with the perk of raping women.

And yet - here we are.

[** W. Brett Wilson ** @WBrettWilson]

This is stupidity at its highest level. You live a block from a friend. In a different zone. And you can no longer just visit.

So fucking idiotic. No benefit to the people or the community or the planet.

Stop!! Please RT.

[Tracey Edwards @DaisyDoos2015]

@ExposedGreens @Wishfullthinki9 This women starved to death her elderly staffie…she needs her picture shown everywhere

[Mikey 🇮🇱🇬🇧 @MikeyPhil64]

Could everyone please repost and share this tweet. I don’t normally ask, but this corner of Norfolk is going to be covered by solar panels and infrastructure the equivalent of 43,200 tennis courts. This insanity must be stopped. Thank you
https://t.co/3ny8od1F9l
@AllisonPearson @TiceRichard @KayMasonBillig