Anne L Beeds

If you feeling froggy, then leap.

[Anne L Beeds @Anne_L_Beeds]

@keithedwards You ain't tearing shit down, chief. You're a bystander in this world. A doer of nothing.

[Anne L Beeds @Anne_L_Beeds]

@PawlowskiMario Your daily reminder that 14-year-old teen boys can beat the USWNST.

[Anne L Beeds @Anne_L_Beeds]

@Blackcapitalis Step 1: Make-up imaginary bad guys.
Step 2: Rant against imaginary bad guys.
Step 3: Feel virtuous for having done nothing.

[Anne L Beeds @Anne_L_Beeds]

@RantingAtheist_ @dStoolofWisdom Source: "Trust me, bro."

[Anne L Beeds @Anne_L_Beeds]

@DameDenaro @HitmanSixActual @ksdotlewis Where exactly is the lie? Do tell! It's a pretty clear choice. If you think there's a third option, by all means, let's hear it.

I know it's hard for you to come to grips with the idea that your holier-than-thou party is just pathetic as the other one.

[Anne L Beeds @Anne_L_Beeds]

@gradientz0 @grok @GoalieInACell @DemzDeliver 1. You don't know what the word "adjudicated" means. Don't use words too big for your britches.

2. She did so, not because Trump "cut hospital funding," as the post implies. She did so as a part of her regular philanthropy. Grok is fair to dub it "misleading."

3. Cry harder.

[Anne L Beeds @Anne_L_Beeds]

@DemzDeliver You are fake news.

[Anne L Beeds @Anne_L_Beeds]

@DameDenaro @HitmanSixActual @ksdotlewis Democrats had all access (and all motive) to the Epstein data while Trump was running. So you have two choices here:

1. There was no data proving him guilty.
2. Democrats sat on the evidence and decided not to release it.

Your choice, "Call it."

[Anne L Beeds @Anne_L_Beeds]

@ksdotlewis Nah, most Democrats wouldn't give two shits. Just as they didn't give two shits when Bill Clinton, in a clear position of authority, got, checks notes, *an intern* to suck his dick.

[Anne L Beeds @Anne_L_Beeds]

@_Vermin_ @CatholicCo200 @AtheistTakes Because objectivity rectifies subjective contradictory implication.

If you think pain is *not good,* and the sadist thinks it is *good,* how can a thing be A and not A at the same time? More importantly, how can we structure a society around that? Might makes right?

[Anne L Beeds @Anne_L_Beeds]

@_Vermin_ @CatholicCo200 @AtheistTakes We're in X. I can't elaborate to the degree I'd like. But your source admits, "The word ‘metaphysics’ is notoriously hard to define." I just take it at its root.

If values are subjective, you've proven my point. They're rather meaningless. We can get into that if you'd like?

[Anne L Beeds @Anne_L_Beeds]

@YourAnonNews Your daily reminder: Not one of Mamdani's policy's have been proven fiscally responsible through time yet. Municipal budgets are predictive estimates, not descriptive realities. He just keeps claiming new policies, and the left is like, "See, it's working!"

[Anne L Beeds @Anne_L_Beeds]

@UgoCannon @Info2Consider But you're the bad faith participant here. He answered your objection. Moreover, you can't even produce one verse to back your claim. Where does it say that people who never met Jesus will go to Hell?

Go ahead, we'll wait.

[Anne L Beeds @Anne_L_Beeds]

@ladiiiiiiiiii11 @J_K_Wood That's a lot of words just to say, "We want to kill our children because, ya know, convenience."

Lots of people go throughout their lives with no regrets of the evil things they do. This doesn't make any of you special.

[Anne L Beeds @Anne_L_Beeds]

@ZacksJerryRig Turns out it's cheaper when you can just commit corporate espionage.

They did it cheaper, but they didn't do it first. And they didn't do it first for the aforementioned reason.

Keep shilling, China boy.

[Anne L Beeds @Anne_L_Beeds]

@_Vermin_ @CatholicCo200 @AtheistTakes Metaphysics is about the reality that is beyond the physical, hence the "meta-" Greek root. It's the reality that can't be observed.

And yet you listed out ideas that are observable. Values are not observable. How does one determine chemical reactions as "better" than another?

[Anne L Beeds @Anne_L_Beeds]

@_Vermin_ @CatholicCo200 @AtheistTakes What is a nature? What are values? In what way do you know something is "further"? These all imply metaphysical qualities.

If we're all just programmed primordial soup—just matter—there are no metaphysical realities. Only a transcendent worldview can assert such things.

[Anne L Beeds @Anne_L_Beeds]

@boopyape Humans always have been, and that's the point. If the atheist extension of naturalism is correct, humans being or not being empathetic is no different than carbon interacting with hydrogen as opposed to nitrogen. Problem is, you don't actually live by this extension.

[Anne L Beeds @Anne_L_Beeds]

@_Vermin_ @CatholicCo200 @AtheistTakes Again, in your worldview, what is understanding? I'm either "programmed" to understand these concepts or not. You trying to condescend here only makes your worldview that much more laughable.

[Anne L Beeds @Anne_L_Beeds]

@_Vermin_ @CatholicCo200 @AtheistTakes You're not fond of anything. You just believe you are. It's all delusion in your worldview. That's kind of the point.