@Defi_Warhol@Morpho@Paxos Morpho is widely used and it's normal. Same with Aave as you know:
"On March 10, 2026, a misconfiguration in Aave V3's Collateral Asset Price Oracle (CAPO) system triggered approximately $27 million in forced liquidations of wrapped staked Ether (wstETH) positions"
@DeFi_Made_Here What do you mean by that?
> No curator does the risk management, because there are no tools on Morpho to do any of it.
You can build your own tools/dashboards to monitor risk. Or there are 3rd party tools that do that
Would be cool if options like TWAP/Linear were more transparent and had additional explanations like "borrowers will be more protected than lenders in such cases: ..."
This will help people choose the proper vault.
@EthanDeFi_ Linear discount shifts the risk from borrowers to lenders.
A genuine reUSD yield spike would leave the market with bad debt instead of a few liquidated loopers.
So this is a tricky decision.
@riksucks Linear discount shifts the risk from borrowers to lenders. A genuine reUSD yield spike would leave the
market with bad debt instead of a few liquidated loopers.
So this is a tricky decision.
@andrewhong5297 My research says there are 19 borrowers, not 12 that lost their money:
- USDC market only: 13 borrowers, $35.2M
- USDT market only: 7 borrowers, $0.96M
- One address (0x6554…) was liquidated in both, so 19 unique across both markets (my number).
Here's what happened based on a quick investigation
- 0x854e... starts TWAP-buying YT-reUSD to push down the price of PT
- borrower 0xaa34... was sitting at a 90.9% LTV
- By buying YTs, 0x854e pushed 5.4M PT into a pool that held 3.1M PTs
- 15-min TWAP price falls to 0.9647, causing 0xaa34 to be flagged for liquidation
- Liquidator 0xd67d... seizes the collateral and repays the debt
- Liquidator and YT buyer are the same entity, because the liquidator paid for the buyer's gas multiple times
- they then use the YT bought + seized PTs to redeem for reUSD without slippage
This entity was already holding YTs and a leverage loop on PT-reUSD so they saw easy money in forcing a liquidation. Their realized gains were at least $360k + they have unrealized p&l from their other positions.
Two major problems:
1) Morpho market used an Oracle with a 15min TWAP, which is not robust enough for long-dated pools that will have low liquidity
2) this type of "MEV" is a looper's nightmare. Play to close to the sun and you're inviting sophisticated players to liquidate you
@eldarcap > @Morpho
launched Midnight a while back and so far it hasn’t gathered much traction (100K active loan roughly).
it will, I think. the product is good