I'm not talking about on the books direct US funding. There's a whole lot of funny money going on out there. There's a whole lot of off the books money being thrown around formerly by usaid and I'm sure there's a few hundred ngos and other entities that are passing it all around. But then it goes to a lot of places that we'll never even know. There's a lot of deceit and a lot of lies and a lot of tomfoolery going on in this world. Haven't you ever wondered how they can pay for the astronomical costs of free healthcare for all and many other things when their budgets and their taxation doesn't even begin to account for it? I bet the FED is passing money to the ECB in ways that are never accounted for. It's all a hot mess in my humble opinion.
There's a severe difference between skills and knowledge. No one is saying to move this surgeon aside before he operates on my brain.
What we're saying is that Western medicine doesn't know jack s*** about chronic ailments. We're so tired and weary from your only 2 solutions: pills, and all the hyped claims about vaccines and what they claim to do versus what they actually do. These awaken more and more of us everyday.
When the experts lie to us and censor us and manipulate in order to come out with some kind of political or malicious outcome, when they're supposed to be helping us remain healthy, is not just a disgrace, it's not just disgusting, we might just want to put some of them in jail for the crimes they've committed and they don't get to be experts anymore. Get over it, doctor.
Wow! Your fancy graph is impressive. The thing is, I don't believe the comment was about mortality. I believe if you look at the instances of childhood autism and other kinds of chronic ailments that plague the ones that survive for the rest of their lives, I believe that's what he was referencing. You know things like milk, strawberry, peanut and other kinds of allergies that we never really saw when we were young. Things like ADHD off the charts. Things like anxiety disorders and inflammation related disease. You are a medical doctor, are you not?
@JamieBonkiewicz It's not the good stuff that we are against. Obviously, it's all of the bad things that are in there that they leave off the disclosure. Have you looked at your arm under a black light lately? Do you know what luciferase is?
@SenWarren Haven't you seen enough fraud under the guise of child care so far? Surely you're aware that we are aware that that's what you use to launder the money. We're just not down for the laundering anymore. Child care for all has nothing to do with it.
@DrNeilStone It is absolutely amazing to watch you advance the other side so solidly. Are you really an AI bot? Or are you simply a shill for the vaccine establishment industry?
Excuse me but, it currently fits the textbook definition of a Ponzi scheme. Get over it and come up with a better system. You thieves in Congress stole the money every year and replaced it with an IOU.
How do you plan to make good on this?
Each individual and their heirs would have been far better off (something like a million dollars better off) if the government had set aside a relatively small amount into certain kinds of readily available investment accounts and let it follow and grow in "the markets" over the decades. Don't quibble about which kind of funds and which markets because you all know that this is true. This has been proven in many look-back scenarios. The current state is clearly and directly Congress' fault.
At this point it would seem you're making this up as you go. Everyone knows it had the same mortality as a common flu. How can you possibly dispute this? If you had comorbidity conditions like diabetes or obesity and if you were older than 70, your risk went up slightly more. Stop immediately with the fear porn. There were simple things that one could do or take that would almost eliminate risk of death, but go ahead and promote your clot shot
@murder_turd@SenSanders Did you not read Bernie's original post? He did. He probably paid hundreds of thousands of dollars more than you did. What is it you're upset about again?
The text you highlighted refers to taxing individuals the same amount. It's referred to as a per capita tax. It's per head. If you have one head you pay one amount. That means if you tax each individual $5 or $100 then everyone pays that same amount. That's different from the immoral and corrupt graduated tax system that we have today. If you want to go to everybody pays a hundred bucks, I'm down for it. If you want to charge different people different amounts, so sorry but that pesky constitution gets in the way again. The founders of our nation were brilliant.