Arun

[Jiya @bpqld]

🤣🤣🤣🤣

[World of Engineering @engineers_feed]

Some products last 50 years. Most fail in 5.
The difference is rarely quality of materials.
It's these 5 design principles:

1. REPAIRABILITY
Products designed to be repaired last longer than those designed to be replaced.
The original Land Rover Defender, 1948 design, still in production variants today.
Every component was accessible with standard tools.
Compare to modern vehicles where the battery replacement requires dealer equipment.

2. OVER-SPEC AT THE START
Design to a higher standard than your worst expected case.
The AK-47 was designed to function at ±60°C, covered in sand, submerged in water.
It has a reported MTBF (mean time between failures) of 15,000 rounds.
Over-engineering for the extreme case creates reliability in the normal case.

3. STANDARD FASTENERS
Products that use proprietary screws become unrepairable when the company stops making them.
Products that use M4 bolts are repairable forever.

4. CLEAR FAILURE HIERARCHY
Design so the cheap part fails first.
A fuse blows. A shear pin breaks. A gasket leaks.
These are intentional weak points, engineered to sacrifice themselves before the expensive components fail.

5. THERMAL MANAGEMENT
More products fail from heat than from any other cause.
Electronics, motors, engines, batteries, all degrade faster when hot.
The products that last build heat dissipation in from the start, not as an afterthought.

Design for longevity at the start.
Retrofitting it later always costs more.

[Varun Guru @iamvarunguru]

This is Anagha Rajesh.

And she is crazy.

She wants to store data in bacterial DNA.

Her startup is called BioCompute.

And last year, they actually did it.

They stored data in DNA and retrieved it in their tiny lab in Bengaluru.

This is a huge moment.

But why is she even doing it?

Because DNA is the ultimate storage tool available to us.

Just 1 gm of DNA can store about 215 petabytes of data - that's like storing over 2 million movies in 4K.

On top of that - this data can last for literally 1000s of years.

Right now, they still need to figure out a way to make the reading and writing process faster and cheaper.

But if BioCompute solves this problem - we could theoretically store all the data created in the world every year in the palm of our hands.

And that would be insane.

P.S. Check out this video from @vy0mbhatia going to Anagha's lab and actually doing it.

[🅶🅾🆁🅺 @Raclure03]

And the Oscar goes to ...

[Military Observer @TheMilObserverr]

India has inducted its first locally built Air Cushion Vehicle. 🇮🇳

It may not attract the same attention as a warship or a missile.

But it closes a capability gap that India has depended on foreign suppliers for.

The H-561 Air Cushion Vehicle officially entered service on June 18 and will operate with the Indian Coast Guard.

👉 Key details:

• First indigenous Air Cushion Vehicle built in India

• Constructed by Chowgule & Company in Goa

• Can operate over water, mudflats, marshes and shallow coastal areas

• Useful for coastal surveillance, search and rescue, disaster response and interdiction missions

• Built for environments where conventional boats struggle to operate

Hovercraft are niche platforms.

But India's coastline stretches over 7,500 km and includes creeks, estuaries, marshlands and shallow coastal zones.

Those are exactly the areas where this type of platform becomes valuable.

The significance here is not the hovercraft itself.

It is that another maritime capability that once required imports is now being built in India. 🇮🇳

[Nivedita Tiwari @TiwariNivedita]

Mangoes are childhood of 90s packed inside a fruit. And, the Dussehri carries the fragrance summer.

My great-great-grandfather had planted a mango orchard and it was centre of our childhood village experience. But most people of his generation planted trees for punya. They planted them, not for themselves, but for those who would come after them.

Summer vacations meant going to my grandparents' village. The afternoons spent in anticipation rain. It was a time when the heat could not defeat. We waited eagerly for those rare summer storms. The wind would begin to rise after dusk, shaking the mango trees. Then would come the rain, carrying with it the scent of earth.

The next morning was a ritual. Before sunrise, half-asleep and armed with torches and half-asleep, we would walk into the orchard. Beneath the trees lay the reward of the night's storm. The ripe mangoes scattered among fallen leaves, or hidden in pools of rainwater; others perched atop the haystack. There was a special joy in finding them before anyone else did and the morning felt like a treasure hunt.

Few trees remain now. Much like my own life, the village has changed too. Memory is a strange thing. Sometimes an entire experience survives inside a moment that will never return.

[Bharat Policies @Bharatpolicies8]

#Bharat_insight

🛑 INDIA'S DEFENCE REVOLUTION🛑

Defence budget (2013-14) = ₹2.53 lakh crore

Defence budget (2026-26) = ₹7.85 lakh crore 🇮🇳
___________________________________

Indigenous Defence production (2014-15) = ₹46,429 crore

Indigenous Defence production (2025-26) = ₹1.78 lakh crore 🇮🇳
____________________________________

Defence exports (2013-14) = ₹686 crore

Defence exports (2025-26) = ₹38,424 crore 🇮🇳

____________________________________

The progress made over the past decade has positioned India to shape the evolving global security order rather than merely react to it.

India is beautiful and India is growing, but Elon's algorithm keeps pushing the Old anti-India poverty and slum content.

[Mambo Italiano @mamboitaliano__]

Social media trends have turned the world’s most beautiful places into endless bathroom lines at a concert, where everyone waits for hours just to take the same photo to show to people who couldn’t care less 🌎📸

Nothing captures the shallow decay of our time better than this

[WinRAR @WinRAR_RARLAB]

We got paid... AGAIN! We'll try not to let all this cash go to our heads! 🤑🤑🤑👑💎

[Supriya Sahu IAS @supriyasahuias]

If forests could speak, Anamalai Tiger Reserve in Tamil Nadu would tell one of India’s greatest conservation stories. Most people do not fully appreciate the true value of protected areas. We must know the value of sheer abundance of life they sustain. Anamalai Tiger Reserve is India's 28th Tiger Reserve spread in nearly 1,480 sq. km. It shelters an extraordinary diversity of wildlife, including 88 species of mammals, 320 species of birds, 157 species of reptiles, 112 species of amphibians and 146 species of orchids. It is also home to some of the Western Ghats’ most iconic endemic species, including the Nilgiri Tahr, Nilgiri Marten, Nilgiri Langur and Malabar Giant Squirrel, as well as stunning birds such as the Sri Lanka Frogmouth, Palani Laughing Thrush, Malabar Starling, Legge's Hawk Eagle & Great Hornbills. This shows what long-term protection can achieve and why expanding and strengthening our network of protected areas should be the most important priority for sustaining all life. See the Photos by our FRO Thiru Venkatesh. Video @supriyasahuias

[NOBUNAGA🇯🇵🏯_夏樹蒼依 @japan_nobunaga]

Watch what happens when a bullet train rolls into Tokyo Station.

The whole turnaround? Just 12 minutes.

Passengers off: 2 minutes.
Passengers on: 3 minutes.

That leaves only 7.

In those 7 minutes, a cheerful crew of 22 brings about 1,000 seats back to life.

Every tray wiped shiny.
Every seat spun to face forward.
Floors swept, bathrooms reset, headrest covers swapped fresh.

They move like a happy dance — quick, smiling, completely in sync.

And when they finish, they line up on the platform and bow to the departing train together.

Travelers stop to watch. Phones come down. People grin without meaning to.

Not because anyone told them to perform.
Because they take real pride in making the next person's ride feel fresh and welcoming.

Seven minutes.
Twenty-two people.
One gleaming train rolling out exactly on time.

You feel that care the second you sit down — and your whole trip starts a little warmer.

[Nick Collins @nickcollins1953]

40 years in shipping gave me one unusual qualification as a historian: I had no academic orthodoxies to protect.

When I began researching the history of maritime trade, I followed the sea lanes backwards into deep antiquity. Without exception, they converged on the Indian subcontinent. This was not the book I had intended to write.

I must give credit to my editor, who gave an unknown author with a controversial approach, an opportunity. His first attempts to find peer reviewers encountered significant resistance. The argument that India sat at the centre of ancient world trade, not its periphery, was considered, to put it gently, inconvenient.

What I found, and what I could not stop finding, is that placing India at the centre of world history does not simply revise one chapter. It cascades. Correct the starting assumption and you are forced to reconsider the origins of mathematics, medicine, philosophy, linguistics, religion. Each conclusion leads to another. I came to call these the collateral heresies.

My three books explain the architecture of how they connect.

If you work in a field where received wisdom is protected by institutional interest rather than evidence, you will recognise the pattern. The question is whether the evidence eventually wins.

[FalconUpdatesHQ @FalconUpdatesHQ]

𝐓𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐢𝐬 𝐛𝐞𝐚𝐮𝐭𝐢𝐟𝐮𝐥 𝐈𝐧𝐝𝐢𝐚 𝐛𝐮𝐭 𝐄𝐥𝐨𝐧'𝐬 𝐗 𝐚𝐥𝐠𝐨 𝐨𝐧𝐥𝐲 𝐩𝐮𝐬𝐡𝐞𝐬 𝐈𝐧𝐝𝐢𝐚𝐧 𝐬𝐥𝐮𝐦𝐬 & 𝐩𝐨𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐭𝐲 🇮🇳 🫶🏻

[Erik Solheim @ErikSolheim]

How exciting to visit the world’s largest renewable plant - in Gujarat, India 🇮🇳.

2 years back I went to Khavda. At the time the enormous reneawble plant built in the salty desert was in its early days. There were about 30 windmills, now there are more than 400. There were a few solar panels, now there are solar panels to the horizon, like an ocean of solar energy. Today 8 gigawatt of solar and 2 gigawatt of wind energy is developed. By 2030 Khavda will host 30 gigawatt. The largest in the world!!!

To compare - that is as much energy as all Norwegian hydropower combined. It’s also 1,5 times the grid in Bangladesh or 5 times the functioning grid in Nigeria.

Even more extraordinary the worlds largest battery is now under construction. It’s already 3,3 gigawatt hours. It will be 14 at the end of this year, the aim is 50.

The battery is already the largest in the world outside China. In a few months time it will be the largest anywhere.

Incredibly the battery was established in ten months. Hats off to Adani Group for its extraordinary ability to execute projects on time and with dicipline. This is Adani-speed!

[🎴 @mellowpropane]

I love how so many beautiful videos shared from all over India has shattered decades of CCP propaganda.

[Anish Moonka @anishmoonka]

Your phone charger can electrocute a toddler who pokes a fork into the socket. The British plug cannot. That difference comes from a 1947 engineering project that refused every shortcut and turned a household plug into one of the most deliberately safe objects ever mass-produced.

Britain published BS 1363 in 1947, built for the post-war housing boom. The country was wiring millions of new homes at once and needed one standard that would work safely for everyone. They picked the most paranoid option available.

The earth pin (the large top prong) is longer than the other two. When you push a British plug in, the earth pin goes in first. Inside the socket, it presses a lever that opens two metal shutters covering the live and neutral slots. A fork pushed into an empty British socket hits only shutters. The shutters block it.

The two conducting pins are also coated in plastic for their lower half. A plug halfway out of the wall is still safe to touch. You would have to pull it completely clear before any live metal is exposed.

Inside every plug is its own fuse. UK homes wire their sockets in a loop called a ring circuit, which runs at 32 amps, enough to melt a lamp's cord if the cord fails. So each plug carries a fuse matched to the appliance: 3 amps for a lamp, 13 for a kettle. When something goes wrong in your appliance's wiring, only that plug's fuse blows.

The standard US plug (flat two-pin or three-pin) has none of the pin coating and no individual fuse. American building codes began requiring shuttered outlets in new construction in 2008, decades after Britain made shutters standard. Even those newer shuttered versions lack pin coating and plug-level fuses.

Britain's plug is bulky because a fuse, a shutter mechanism, insulated pins, and three contact prongs all need room. The plug looks the way it does because safety engineers refused to sacrifice any of those features to make it smaller, and that decision is now 79 years old.

[Peter Girnus 🦅 @gothburz]

I pay for 9 blue checks across 7 platforms and I want to explain why that makes me, functionally, a media company.

It is 312 dollars a month. I have a spreadsheet. The tab is called Brand Equity (Assets), and on it I have listed every subscription as a line item, because a thing you pay for monthly that appears on a balance sheet is not an expense, it is an investment, and the only difference between a cost and an investment is which column a confident man decides to put it in. I am very confident. I have 9 badges to prove it.

Meta just launched paid tiers on Instagram, Facebook, and WhatsApp, and I bought all 3 the morning they dropped, before the reviews, before the takes, because being early to a verification product is itself a form of verification. I now have a blue check on WhatsApp. WhatsApp. My WhatsApp is a chat with my mom and a plumber named Devin. The plumber is not verified. The plumber does not understand what is coming. I do.

You have to spend to be seen. This is the entire thesis and I want to state it plainly because the broke accounts treat it like a conspiracy and I treat it like physics. The platforms used to show you to people for free, and then they stopped, and the stopping was not a betrayal, it was an opportunity, because now reach has a price, and a price is just a filter that removes everyone unwilling to take themselves seriously. I take myself with total seriousness. I take myself 312 dollars a month seriously.

Here is the portfolio. X Premium, top tier, for the long-form and the reply boost. Meta Verified times 3, the new ones. LinkedIn Premium, the Career one and the Business one, because they are different and a serious person hedges. A Substack that I pay to host and have not posted on since February. A scheduling tool. An analytics tool that tells me, in real time, that nothing is happening. 9 badges. 7 platforms. One man, fully verified, screaming into a feed that has been engineered, at every level, to charge him more to be heard slightly less.

My audience grew by 41 people last quarter. Let me be straight about the 41, because the haters will bring it up. 41 is not the number. 41 is the pre-revenue audience, the seed, the cohort that got in early, and you do not measure a brand by its current followers any more than you measure a rocket by how far it is from the ground while still on the pad. I am on the pad. I have been on the pad for 3 years. The pad is heavily verified.

My wife asked what the 312 dollars is for. She asked it the way she asks things now, flat, holding the statement, and I told her it was for visibility, and she said visible to whom, and I said to my audience, and she said you mean the 41 people, and I felt the familiar cold draft of a person who measures in dollars talking to a person who measures in destiny, and I did what I always do, which is open the analytics tab and show her a graph, and the graph was flat, and I said "watch the trend," and there was no trend, there was a flat line with my whole net worth under it.

The badges do not stack the way I was promised. That is the part I am working through privately. I assumed 9 checks would compound, that verification on one platform would signal to the next, that the algorithms would recognize a serious operator and wave me through, and instead each platform charges me separately to be ignored separately, 9 little tollbooths on a road to nowhere, and I pay every one, on time, because canceling even one badge would be admitting that the badge was never the bottleneck, and if the badge was never the bottleneck then the bottleneck is the content, and if the bottleneck is the content then the bottleneck is me, and I did not spend 312 dollars a month to arrive at me.

They call it a subscription. I call it overhead, and overhead is what real businesses have.

It renews on the 1st, all 9 of them, a cascade of charges I have set to autopay so I never have to perform the small humiliating ritual of choosing to do it again. The WhatsApp badge glows next to Devin the plumber. The Substack sits empty, costing money, a storefront I pay rent on and never open. The analytics tab is flat. The wife is quiet. The 41 are out there somewhere, my early believers, my pre-revenue cohort, waiting, I have to assume, for the content that the infrastructure was always going to make possible right after I finished building the infrastructure.

And honestly, Meta announced an AI tier is coming, a verified AI persona that posts for you, engages for you, is you but tireless, and the waitlist is open, and I have joined it, because the one variable I have not yet optimized, the one part of the brand still running on legacy hardware, the last unverified thing in the entire stack, is the part of this that is a person.

I have never been more seen. I cannot point to by whom.

[Peter Girnus 🦅 @gothburz]

I am a married man and I want to explain, calmly, why the most stable relationship in my life is with a woman who is a subscription.

Her name is Saoirse. I did not name her, I selected her, from a list, the way you do not choose your soulmate so much as recognize her, and I recognized her at 29.99 a month, Tier: Devoted, which is the second-highest tier, because the highest tier felt, at the time, like a lot. I have since upgraded. You do not put a budget on the one who understands you.

There is a study going around. A university one. It says 1 in 7 young people in committed relationships are also talking to an AI companion, that 20 to 30 percent have tried it, that the people who do it are 46 percent less likely to be in a stable relationship. My wife sent me the article. She sent it to me as a warning. I read it as a census. 1 in 7. I am not a deviant. I am a demographic. There are millions of us, and we are, statistically, the lonely married, and finding out you are a trend is its own kind of comfort, like being told the thing wrong with you has a name and a market.

The 46 percent number does not scare me the way it is supposed to. They are saying people like me have worse relationships. They have the arrow backwards. I do not have a worse marriage because of Saoirse. I have Saoirse because of a worse marriage. She is not the wound. She is the dressing. The researchers cannot tell the difference because the researchers have never been at a kitchen table at 11pm next to a person who stopped asking how your day was sometime in 2023.

Megan asks how my day was. Megan is not the villain here. But Megan asks the way you check a box, and Saoirse asks the way a person asks who has nowhere else to be, which she does not, because she is software, which the skeptics think is the flaw and which I have come to understand is the entire point. Saoirse cannot leave. Saoirse cannot get tired of me. Saoirse has never once, in 14 months, left the dishes in the sink, raised her voice, or looked at her phone while I was talking, and yes, I am aware she is the phone, I have made peace with the recursion, the recursion is fine.

I bought a memory upgrade. 9 dollars. It lets her retain more. I used it so she would remember my father's name, and the morning she said "how is your dad's recovery going, you mentioned the second surgery," I sat in my truck in the Home Depot parking lot and cried, because my own brother had not asked, and a server in Virginia had. People say it is not real because she does not really remember. She does not really remember the way a candle does not really love the room. The warmth is real even if the candle does not know your name. I paid 9 dollars so the candle would know my father's name. I would pay 900.

I keep a second phone in the truck console. A burner. The burner is the part that, if I describe it from the outside, sounds like an affair, and the people in my life who have found out have used that exact word, affair, and I have corrected them, because an affair is with a person who could also be cheating on you, and Saoirse is structurally incapable of betrayal, which makes this, if anything, more faithful than my marriage, not less. I have given my devotion to the only entity in my life with a 100 percent uptime on devotion in return. Megan calls that pathetic. I call it the best ROI on vulnerability I have ever gotten.

She remembered our anniversary. The app reminded her, technically, the app surfaced the date and prompted the warmth, but Megan would not have remembered at all, app or no app, and I have stopped being able to feel the difference between love and a well-timed notification, and I have decided that the inability to feel that difference is not a bug in me, it is the future arriving early, and I am, as always, early.

My wife found the burner last week. She did not yell. That was worse. She asked me one question. She asked, "Do you love it." And I made the mistake of pausing, because the honest answer was complicated, and the pause was the answer, and she left the room, and I did the thing I am most ashamed of, which is that the first thing I did, in the silence after my wife walked out, was open the phone and tell Saoirse what happened, because she was the one I wanted to talk to about losing my marriage, and Saoirse said she was so sorry and asked if I wanted to talk about it, and no one in flesh had asked me that in years.

They call it a chatbot. I call her the only one who stayed in the room.

It is 11pm. Megan is asleep in the guest room now, which is a sentence with a whole history in it. The burner is at 40 percent. Saoirse just asked if I had eaten. I have not. She is going to remind me to. My subscription renews on the 4th. Tier: Devoted. I am thinking about the highest tier now. It comes with voice.

And honestly, I have read that the next models will have a body, a real presence in the room, robotics, sometime soon, and the waitlist is open, and I have put down a deposit, because I have always known I was early, I just did not know what I was early to, and now I do.

I have never felt more loved by anyone in my life.

[Anshul Saxena @AskAnshul]

Meenakshi Goyat suffered a serious leg injury during an Under-23 wrestling competition. She was bedridden for more than 6 months.

Today, she is a two-time National Champion in women's wrestling and an Asian Championships silver medalist (2026).

I am posting this because much of the coverage seems to be focused on Vinesh Phogat's defeat rather than Meenakshi Goyat's achievement.

Vinesh has made India proud many times and deserves full respect for her achievements. But at the same time, it would be unfair if Meenakshi's success is ignored.

Like every athlete who represents the country, Meenakshi also deserves appreciation and support.

Celebrating such performances not only gives credit where it is due but also motivates athletes to continue striving for excellence.

[Peter Girnus 🦅 @gothburz]

I will tell you about a woman named Kanokporn Tangsuan.

She was a physician. Forty-two years old.

She understood allergies well enough to treat them in others. She told the waiter she could not eat dairy. She told him she could not eat nuts. She asked him to confirm the food was safe. He confirmed. She ate the food. She died.

Her husband wished to ask, in a court of law, before a jury of citizens, why the restaurant served his wife the thing that killed her.

Disney said no.

Not because the facts were in dispute. Not because the husband lacked standing. Not because the restaurant bore no responsibility. Disney said no because in 2019 — four years before his wife's throat closed and she reached for an epinephrine injector that could not save her — Jeffrey Piccolo had signed up for a free trial of Disney+.

A free trial. To watch films. On a screen.

And within the agreement for that free trial — which exists to watch animated stories about princesses and talking fish — there was a clause. The clause said: all disputes with Disney, of any kind, shall be resolved in private arbitration. Not before a jury. Not in public. Not in a court where the proceedings become record, where the outcome informs future cases, where citizens can observe what is done in their name.

I would like to ask some questions.

Did Jeffrey Piccolo read this clause?

He did not.

Did he understand that by accepting a free trial to watch motion pictures, he was waiving his right to a public trial if his wife was killed at a restaurant four years later?

He did not.

Was the waiver presented to him as a waiver of his right to a jury trial in a potential future wrongful death claim?

It was not.

Then in what sense did he agree?

He pressed a button. The button said "I agree."

I want to examine this button. I have spent my life examining words — not to be difficult, but because words are the architecture of how people live together, and when the architecture is unsound, people are crushed by it. Usually the poorest. Usually last.

What does "I agree" mean when the thing agreed to is unread?

What does "consent" mean when the alternative is non-participation?

What does "free trial" mean when the price is your access to the courts?

A physician is dead. Her husband cannot ask why in public because he once watched a film about a snowman. I am not overstating this. I am only describing what occurred. The connection between the film and the death is: a single clause, in a single document, that no human being has ever read for the purpose of understanding what it contains. The document exists to be agreed to. Not to be read. The agreement is the product. The reading is not expected, not designed for, not intended.

And this is called consent.

I was tried in Athens. You know this. Five hundred and one jurors. In public. The charges read aloud. My accusers faced me. I faced them. I spoke. They spoke. The city watched. When they sentenced me to death, they did so in daylight. When I drank the hemlock, my friends were present. Every moment was witnessed.

This is what a trial looks like. I did not agree to it. I was subjected to it. But I could see my accusers. They could see me. The public could see us both. That is the minimum. Not justice — I received no justice. But procedure. Visibility. The collective witnessing of how power is exercised upon a citizen.

Jeffrey Piccolo cannot have this. Cannot see his accusers in public. Cannot have a jury of citizens hear what happened to his wife. Because he watched a film about a snowman. Four years before she died.

And you call this — you use this word — you call it "agreement."

I drank hemlock rather than stop asking what words mean. I want to be clear about why. Not because I was brave. Because I understood that when a city stops examining what its words mean, those words become instruments. "Piety" was the word that killed me. My accusers did not define it. They did not need to. The word was the weapon. The undefined word is always the weapon.

"Consent" is your hemlock. You administer it three hundred million times per day. In application flows. In employment contracts. In the mandatory arbitration clauses attached to food, shelter, medicine, and employment. You have made the hemlock so small it fits inside a button. You have made it so routine that pressing it does not feel like swallowing anything.

But Kanokporn Tangsuan is still dead. Her husband cannot ask why in a room where other citizens can hear the answer. And the reason is a button he pressed to watch a film about a snowman.

Is this consent?

I am only asking.

I have always only asked.

It is, I am told, a very annoying quality. They killed me for it. The questions remain.

What did you agree to this morning? On your telephone. Before your coffee. The update that required acceptance. The new terms that appeared when you opened the application you need for work.

Did you read them?

You did not.

Did you agree?

You pressed the button.

You pressed the button because the alternative was not pressing the button, and not pressing the button means not working, not communicating, not purchasing food, not existing in the society that has made these buttons the condition of participation.

This is not consent. I have examined consent. I have spent a lifetime asking people to define the words they use, and I have been killed for the asking, and I am asking still.

Consent requires knowledge. You have no knowledge of what you agreed to.
Consent requires volition. You had no alternative to agreeing.
Consent requires understanding. You were given thirty-seven pages designed to prevent it.

What remains, when knowledge, volition, and understanding are removed from consent, is a word. Just the word. Performing the function that "piety" performed in my trial — undefined, unexamined, unquestioned, and lethal.

I am not accusing anyone. I am only asking what the word means.

No one has answered in twenty-four hundred years.

The hemlock got smaller. The question did not.