"Person with autism" is the language of the disability rights movement (DRM) and all our disability legislation - legacy to be proud of.
"Autistic" is identity.
I claim use both as positive usages, as proud of both legacies.
The Inclusive Africa Icon Award is closing entries on Saturday, 27th April 2024. Apply now if you're an African youth using assistive technology in an innovative way and making an impact in the community. 🙂
Link: https://t.co/RJJiaD579e
#InclusiveAfrica2024
This month, we celebrate our #autistic community! Join us by (re)watching #LISTEN, the viral, award-winning short film we made by and with #nonspeaking autistic folks. Find a toolkit, transcripts, versions in different languages, and shorter versions here: https://t.co/HRyfSPtnZF
These people had to eat locusts to curb their hunger.
War in Sudan has put nearly 5 million people on the brink of starvation – and only 5% of the country can afford a meal a day.
@NeuroArchie @ekverstania The coiner her(?)self says she meant for it to be an umbrella term for any brain divergent from the norm, incl bc of trauma-related mental illness, brain injuries, neurodegenerative disorders, etc. in this post responding to exactly this misconception 🙂:
https://t.co/V9MP2p1Fvs
@NeuroArchie @ekverstania The coiner her(?)self says she meant for it to be an umbrella term for any brain divergent from the norm, incl bc of trauma-related mental illness, brain injuries, neurodegenerative disorders, etc. in this post responding to exactly this misconception 🙂:
https://t.co/V9MP2p1Fvs
@Kristin67377787 Wording matters, yes. Your wording was clear enough. Your no meant yes, many people just misunderstood it, thinking that no meant no. But you cleared that up for us in multiple explanatory posts.
This is the correct understanding now, no?
https://t.co/tL1Itu8qr9
@Kristin67377787 @LansleyAnna @NeuroArchie @ekverstania Thank you for the explanation.
I now understand that these words actually mean, "YES, it is developmental conditions AND brain damage. The thing about fried brains is actually pretty insulting to those on the spectrum AND to people with brain damage."
https://t.co/xZws8CX0f7
@Kristin67377787 So you're basically shifting now to talk about a different aspect of the post, so you don't have to continue defending what you originally said about the term 'neurodivergent'?
@NeuroArchie @ekverstania The coiner her(?)self says she meant for it to be an umbrella term for any brain divergent from the norm, incl bc of trauma-related mental illness, brain injuries, neurodegenerative disorders, etc. in this post responding to exactly this misconception 🙂:
https://t.co/V9MP2p1Fvs
@Kristin67377787@ekverstania Their lack of understanding may explain why they asked the question about the term in the first place. If they understood, they wouldn't have needed to ask, probably. Unless they were just doing it for effect.
@Kristin67377787 OK. So brain damaged people are accepted—they just need that extra word ('acquired')—as long as you don't call autistic people brain damaged, unless their brains are damaged, because it's insulting to confuse disabilities, like calling people with brain damage autistic?
@Kristin67377787@ekverstania So you don't have brain damage, but you think differently; but some people do have brain damage and they think differently; and it's a problem to you that the word 'aquired' was not used to set you apart from them?