*Truth_Always_Wins*

It's all about the Truth! Standing up and protecting our children against the corruption of social services.
Expose the lot! 💥

[*Truth_Always_Wins* @BFlowers12688]

Please ask @WbaSteve @ShaneKyle10 #Halesowen #WBA

[*Truth_Always_Wins* @BFlowers12688]

Do you know them? #wba #halesowen

[*Truth_Always_Wins* @BFlowers12688]

Innocent families lives changed by decisions based on false information💔
NO DUE PROCESS #Accountability

[Bernie @Artemisfornow]

So let me get this straight. The unelected quango Ofgem, set up to “protect” consumers is er …. Going to protect the energy suppliers instead.

Yes that’s right… when wholesale prices go up our bills will go up but when they go down … we will be charged more so the energy companies don’t lose profit.

And if you switch to a cheaper energy company they have to pay compensation to the supplier you left because they were to expensive.

This is as stupid as it sounds.

[ETHICAL APPROACH UK @EthicalApproach]

THE QUESTION IS NO LONGER WHETHER GOVERNMENT WAS ENGAGED WITH OPERATION TALLA.

The Home Office has now confirmed in writing that it was engaged with Operation Talla in relation to:

• policy alignment;
• information sharing;
• strategic coordination.

That admission moves the issue on.

The question now is what those words meant in practice.

• What policy was being aligned?
• What information was being shared?
• What was being strategically coordinated?
• Did Covid- or vaccination-related reports made by members of the public form any part of those discussions?
• And what safeguards ensured that this engagement did not cross the constitutional boundary into influence over operational policing?

Those questions matter because the same Home Office has previously insisted that police must be able to make decisions “free from political influence.”

They matter still more because the former Chair of the Operation Talla policing ethics committee later told Parliament that chief constables had been “under such pressure from Government Ministers” that police wanted independent support against “that kind of ministerial overreach."

And they matter because primary policing documents now establish that national guidance existed which was described internally as guidance “to not record” certain Covid/vaccination-related reports.

So the issue is now concrete:

• Where did that guidance originate?
• Who proposed it?
• Who authorised it?
• What informed it?
• And did Government policy, information, expectation or strategic coordination contribute to it?

The Home Office has answered part of the question - It has not yet answered the whole of it.

[*Truth_Always_Wins* @BFlowers12688]

When children are separated from their Mother, Father and their entire family they love, they carry that loss with them
SPEAK UP FOR TRUTH & JUSTICE 💔

[Freyja. Missing Children Advocate🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 @FreyjaBakke]

💥 EXPOSED: KENT POLICE OFFICER CAUGHT WITH HORRIFIC CATEGORY A CHILD ABUSE IMAGES USED DARK WEB SOFTWARE TO HIDE HIS TRACKS

A disgraced Kent Police officer who was supposed to protect vulnerable children was instead secretly accessing some of the most disturbing child sexual abuse material imaginable — using specialist software to conceal his activities from investigators.

Thomas Blant, then aged 38, had served as a police constable for six years when his sickening double life was uncovered by the National Crime Agency.

But despite admitting two offences involving indecent images of children, including material in the most serious Category A classification, the father-of-two escaped an immediate prison sentence.

Blant was sentenced at Maidstone Crown Court on to 12 months in prison, suspended for two years.

The case exposed an extraordinary betrayal of public trust by a serving police officer whose professional responsibility was to uphold the law and protect the very people exploited in the material he was accessing.

Investigators discovered that Blant had been using TOR, software capable of providing anonymous access to the dark web, alongside a computer-cleaning application designed to remove traces of online activity.

He apparently believed his attempts to conceal his activities would prevent investigators from uncovering the truth.

He was wrong.

National Crime Agency officers traced access to a website containing child sexual abuse material to his family home in Wye, near Ashford, Kent.

When officers raided the property in January 2020, they seized electronic devices and began a forensic investigation.

What they uncovered was deeply disturbing.

Despite Blant's attempts to delete evidence, investigators recovered 17 indecent images of children from his laptop, including Category A material, the most serious classification of child sexual abuse imagery.

Another four illegal images were recovered from an old mobile phone.

In total, 21 indecent images were identified across his devices.

The court heard how Blant had deliberately used software intended to disguise his internet activity and remove evidence of the websites he had visited.

Judge Philip Statman confronted the former officer over his actions, telling him: "You thought you would never be caught because of the protection you had installed on your computer. You have a predilection for young girls."

The judge also spoke about the devastating impact on Blant's family, telling him that his actions and appearance in court had put his wife through hell.

Blant had moved out of the family home following his arrest and was living in Southend, with restrictions placed on his contact with his children.

He pleaded guilty to two counts of making indecent images of children, an offence which includes downloading illegal images.

Despite the seriousness of the offending, Blant avoided immediate imprisonment.

Alongside his suspended sentence, he was ordered to attend 40 rehabilitation sessions, made subject to a five-year Sexual Harm Prevention Order and required to register as a sex offender for ten years.

Kent Police suspended him following his arrest and subsequently dismissed him from the force.

The National Crime Agency condemned his offending as a shocking abuse of the position of trust he had held as a police officer.

Martin Ludlow, speaking for the agency, described the case as an "outrageous misuse of trust" and stressed that accessing such material fuels the exploitation of real children

The case raised serious questions about how a serving police constable could secretly access child sexual abuse material while remaining in a position of authority and public trust.

For six years, Blant had worn the uniform of a police force entrusted with protecting communities across Kent.

Predator awareness

[TheFeralWitch🔮🇬🇧🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 @TheFeralWitchy]

THREE RAPES!

A SERVING SHETLAND POLICE OFFICER! 🚓

The very people women should be able to turn to for protection! 🤯🤬

Carmichael John Williamson, 32, convicted of horrific sexual offences committed over several years in Shetland.

Imagine finding the courage to report being raped, knowing your attacker is a POLICE OFFICER!

What an utterly disgusting betrayal of trust!

My heart goes out to these incredibly brave women. 💔

sentencing on 8 December

[Raymond @Raymond82310289]

BBC licence fee to be extended to YouTube, Netflix & Amazon.

This is completely unacceptable.

Those of us who have decided not to watch terrestrial TV should not be forced to pay for and prop up an outdated system.

Let the BBC sink or swim on its own.

https://t.co/ybqx0IS4Gk

[Sonia Poulton @SoniaPoulton]

Friday's WAKE UP at 9am BST

Thank you for all your lovely messages, I'm back to better health and raring to go with our 'Dark Side' series.

Tomorrow the spotlight falls on this man:

Presenter Jeremy Kyle.

A man known for hypocrisy and deceit.

A man who has been endlessly promoted despite (or because of) his known ‘dark side’.

A man who has devoted his propaganda career to propping up the British establishment.

A man with a long history of royal connections.

A man whose career has largely existed around the pushing of poverty porn and the demonisation of the more vulnerable amongst us.

A man with a death count around his shows.

A man who can be counted on to support State Agendas from C19 to Ukraine.

A man who has been given the all-clear by the broken and bent media establishment to continue working against the betterment of people and on behalf of the parasitic controllers.

Come and join me live. We have the liveliest of live chats who will make you welcome.

LINKS:

Rumble: https://t.co/IaF4qbx5R3

You Tube: https://t.co/Q17LNMN2LZ

Available on Spotify at the end of the stream.

WE DO NEWS DIFFERENT. SOMEONE HAD TO.

[TH101UK 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 @Truthhurts101UK]

Yet AGAIN, police called to the Delta Hotel in Warwick today as migrants fight outside.

[WasAcop @WasAcop]

Former DUP leader Jeffrey Donaldson has been sentenced to 15 years in prison after being found guilty of 18 child sex offences.

The 63-year-old was found to have committed the crimes between 1985 and 2008, when the two victims were children.

https://t.co/GkF0XFnKzS

[Giggling Gannon @GigglingGanon]

Corrupt CPS officer gets exposed for her lying and deception by the guy. Watch her ego crumble in real time. Lawsuit currently in progress.

Warrantless raids, manufactured emergencies, and weaponized state power: this is what happens when Child Protective Services operates completely unchecked under color of law.

​What you are watching on this doorbell camera is not routine child welfare—l, it is a calculated retaliatory maneuver by Loudoun County Child Protective Services (CPS) and local sheriff’s deputies after a citizen refused to surrender his constitutional rights.

​The homeowner, Farzin Yazdani, found himself targeted by an escalating series of malicious, bad-faith reports stemming from a contentious custody feud. The reporting party had already filed fabricated assault accusations against him that local prosecutors ultimately dropped (nolle prossed).

But when direct criminal allegations failed, social services was brought in as a proxy weapon to target his children, including his one-month-old breastfeeding infant, Roxana.
​When caseworkers first descended on his residence flanked by armed deputies, they possessed no search warrant, no court order, and no legal authority to breach the threshold.

Yazdani stood firm behind his door, invoking his Fourth Amendment right against warrantless government searches. In response, CPS engaged in blatant bad-faith tactics:

​ Rather than respecting clear constitutional boundaries, the agency documented a citizen's lawful refusal of warrantless entry as hostile "non-compliance" and an "imminent threat," using his exercise of rights as a pretext to manufacture an emergency.

Within 30 minutes of the initial standoff, Yazdani reached out and offered to let the caseworker visually inspect the infant that very evening, provided she arrived without armed law enforcement. CPS and county officials rejected the offer, went before a magistrate the very next day, and falsely attested under oath that "no less-drastic alternative existed" to physically seizing the children.

The caseworker showed up with an emergency removal order obtained with zero prior notice, deliberately emailing the legal filings to Yazdani's work address just three minutes before knocking on his door, blatantly dodging his civil rights attorney who was actively calling her cell phone on the doorstep.

In their rush to execute the order, authorities forcibly seized a one-month-old nursing baby girl from her mother, Emily, a parent against whom the state had never leveled a single accusation of abuse or neglect.

​The state’s manufactured narrative completely collapsed the moment it faced actual judicial scrutiny. Following an exhaustive five-day contested evidentiary hearing, a family court judge dismantled the agency's claims, threw out the emergency removal orders, and ruled that the statutory threshold for state intervention had never been met. Baby Roxana was ordered returned home after eight days in state custody.

​The battle, however, is far from over. Rather than letting the misconduct stay hidden behind closed doors, Yazdani has escalated the fight to federal court, filing a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights lawsuit against the involved Loudoun County deputies and caseworkers for unconstitutional seizure, due process violations, and abuse of state power.

This lawsuit is in progress and we will update once there is a conclusion.

[Katie Amess @KatieAmess]

Today marks the 5th anniversary of the darkest of days. My dad lifted his eyes to heaven and I am left down here to fight for him. I will never stop until I get answers. Please keep us in your prayers. #justiceforsirdavid

[The Heartlands Tribune @HeartlandsTrib]

THE FOREVER WAR

Your money. Their war. No limit.

£25 BILLION of British public money to Ukraine since 2022. And the billions keep going.

Who else wants a full, independent audit of every penny we've spent on Ukraine?

Where did it go? Who received it? Who profited?

Before Westminster signs another blank cheque, let's see the bloody receipts.

#ukraine

[ETHICAL APPROACH UK @EthicalApproach]

We know the records exist - Produce them...!

Police Scotland’s DCC Alan Speirs tells the Scottish COVID-19 Inquiry that significant Operation Talla decisions were recorded.

He describes action logs, decision logs and policy records, including records associated with decisions taken outside formal meetings.

That evidence invites a straightforward demand.

Produce the records establishing who authorised the January 2022 instruction concerning vaccine-related reports, what evidence informed it, what legal advice supported it and what scrutiny it received.

If the relevant records cannot be located, explain the searches. If they were never created, explain how that accords with the account now given. If disclosure is refused, identify and justify the grounds.

General assurances about proportionate policing cannot answer specific questions about a documented instruction.

The public is entitled to ask how that instruction was reconciled with the individual assessment of reported criminality.

The decision. The reasons. The authority. The scrutiny.

Produce the records which allow the questions to be answered. Simple.

[ETHICAL APPROACH UK @EthicalApproach]

Once one police domino weakens, they all tumble.

[*Truth_Always_Wins* @BFlowers12688]

Our children have shown incredible strength through everything they have been subjected to since being wrongly taken from their loving family 💔

[The Free Speech Union @SpeechUnion]

🚨🚨 POLICE WATCHDOG FINDS THE MET POLICE MAY HAVE UNFAIRLY ARRESTED FATHER TED CREATOR GRAHAM LINEHAN FOR LAWFUL GENDER-CRITICAL VIEWS.

Last year, @Glinner was arrested at Heathrow Airport by five armed police officers over three gender-critical posts on X.

With the support of the Free Speech Union, Graham sent a pre-action letter to the Police arguing that his arrest was unlawful and breached his right to freedom of expression under Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights. The Met issued a formal public apology and paid £25,000 in compensation.

Graham also submitted a complaint to the Directorate of Professional Standards asking them to review the police’s conduct in arresting and detaining him. The results of that complaint were unsatisfactory. Although Scotland Yard found that the handling of his case had been unacceptable, shockingly none of the officers involved were disciplined.

After lodging a complaint with the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC), the IOPC has now ruled that the review did not go far enough and that its findings were “not reasonable and
proportionate”.

The Met has been ordered to reinvestigate Linehan’s complaints, including whether he was unfairly treated because of his lawful gender-critical beliefs, which are protected under the Equality Act 2010.

Following the findings, Mr Linehan said: “The so-called complainant in this case has made scores of spurious claims, as evidenced by the High Court claims that he has lost.

“The only possible reason the Met acted in the extreme way they did was political bias. That the Met sought to cover this up is yet more evidence of a two-tier approach to the policing of this debate.”

General Secretary of the Free Speech Union, Lord Young of Acton, told The Telegraph: “This finding by the IOPC is very welcome. I hope it means that in future the police will take freedom-of-expression rights into consideration before arresting someone for a tweet.”

The Free Speech Union is proud to continue supporting Graham Linehan in his case.

Read more in The Telegraph 👇

[Debi Evans @DebiEvansMatron]

🚨Whoah 😳 In less than 20 seconds Dominic Cummings creates stunned silence at Lords Committee this morning.

One of the few remaining centres of excellence in the U.K.?

British Special Forces & who is their biggest enemy? Russia? China? Iran?
No - 20 seconds he doesn’t mince his words ⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️

[John Olooney @OlooneyJohn]

I’m telling you all now, as a funeral director of twenty years who sat with EVERY family told they had lost a loved one to covid, a pattern emerged very quickly.

They ALL had pretty the same exact story.
None of them went into hospital with covid.
None.
None had covid going into hospital.
They ALL "caught it in there".

Thats the first statistical total impossibility.

They all went into hospital, usually after a fall or with a water or chest infection or simply because they were old and frail, and then the waiting hyenas you clapped on doorsteps for closed in on them.
Let me explain.

After some serious deep investigation it became very clear what the template for the lie was consistent.
I even went through their process myself when they targetted me.

They will PCR test and Lateral Flow test you, endlessly, only until they produced a positive covid result, usually on between 40-45 cycles, the more cycles the greater likelihood of a fake positive, 25 cycles is recommended with PCR

They used 45 cycles locally on PCR almost always getting the result they needed to act.

At no point were those tested usually even symptomatic - not until the covid "treatment" commenced once they were transferred on to a covid ward on the back of that faked positive covid test result.

They all knew it was fake, the science and facts confirm that if you choose to look at it in detail.
I have done so and i challenge anyone to call me out on that fact.

Much like a cancer patient who is also asymptomatic on diagnosis, they only displayed expected symptoms once "treatment" had begun.

So" treatment" of asymptomatic people labelled as covid positive on the back of a 45 cycle PCR test consisted of Ventilation, Remdesivir and morphine and loads of it.

Once you give someone a drug you’ll often see known side effects, we all know what morphine does..

But remdesivir is the real killer, remdesivir was the covid.

So they faked a covid test, treated these vulnerable people no one could visit with remdesivir.
Only then you see "respiratory symptoms" as they simply fall over and die full of fluid due to kidney and organ failure - because of the remdesivir and because of the morphine suppressing their ability to breath.

They tell the family they caught covid in there.
The family of course believe it, they cannot attend, they kill their loved ones with no one even present or allowed in.

Hospitals were all bribed or bullied to take remdesivir in, none of them even wanted it, they know what it does.
Ask any respiratory consultant what that protocol does to those struggling to breath - it kills them.
Yet they did it over and over and over - to convince you of covid.

They were bullied or bribed with discounts on other medical supplies they regularly bought and did need.
The paper trails are there to find.
lets see them, foi requests, get them in.

I throw down the gauntlet to ANY respiratory consultant to challenge what i have written above on remdesivir and morphine protocols for respiratory patients. - its murder.

Any respiratory consultant prescribing remdesivir to a respiratory patient is a murderer based on clinical fact and the consistent and endless outcomes of those poor souls given it.
And they monetised it.

None of them will ever speak or debate me, they never have.
Because they all know the truth.

EVERY single family told me the exact same story throughout covid.

Google "side effects of remdesivir" and KNOW the truth.
Anyone who was given that drug and went on to be labelled as a covid death was a murder victim.

Oh and to cap it all off look at the amount of money that was given to hospitals for each covid labelled death.

Why the fck would anyone in their right mind monetise a covid labelled death outcome in a "pandemic" ?
Why ?
I will tell you why.

To incentivise covid and generate covid labelled deaths and convince people to offer their arms for the "cure" , which is now the biggest killer of all.

They had to incentivise killers to claw that money in.

Make sure you clap on doorsteps.