I’ll try and compress 20 years of experience into 30 seconds
Startups have a GREAT FILTER that kills almost everyone. It’s there to weed out the people who aren’t meant to build companies
The good news is it can be beaten - even with little or no capital. Once you beat it, you can do it again. You can choose to stay at the current level or attempt to level up
The level boss is always the same: if you quit, you fail
I can’t stress this enough: almost every skill can be learned. Never stop improving. You can acquire new skills, hire better people, change the product, pivot the strategy, or rethink your assumptions
You’ll hit the wall. Most will quit. But just keep going
If something isn’t working, change course. Change your vector: reassess your hypothesis, measure the results, and keep iterating
Also working hard compounds. The more quality work you can put in, the better your odds. There is no balance
Almost nobody succeeds on their first attempt
If you want it badly enough, you can bend the future in your direction
Just start. And keep pushing
@Capulous@bee_fumo This is weird def. of word "owning".
When you own something, that means you can do everything, even sell it. Can you sell your digital copy in GoG after you done, without selling account itself? There's market for that?
What you said is no diff with this, besides offline setup
@yaakovmarkel@itsolelehmann "Non-diagnostic" is the obvious start status, so they could farm dataset now and become "diagnostic" in near future.
Hype because it's by a completely non-medical AI company.
It’s a prime illustration of high-tech in medicine scaling exponentially, fueled by raw compute and AI.
@vxunderground Skill issue.
Age and time themselves don't mean shit. It’s about what really matters to you right now, which I guess is family in your case.
It's about who you've become over the years, in your case it's just a depressed relic who threatens to shoot himself every three days.
@yaakovmarkel@itsolelehmann A. How and why are you so sure this is false? It’s 2026 - why do you think it’s impossible to build better tech than was in 1973?
B. Same question as A.
C. Yes, misleading because of who posted it. MJ was comparing it to a CT scan, which involves a ~5 mSv amount of radiation.
@AmbellaMK05@bee_fumo And what next? Where will science go, where will tech, medicine, bio-engineering go?
Datacenters it's not about AI - it's just compute resource and we need that fucking desperately.
Climate are tragic now, so we need them Net-Zero energy and zero emissions. But we need them.
@messmerflame148@bee_fumo Dude, first of all, who the fuck are you to say "we" and "nobody" in every sentence? You represent only yourself, remember this pls.
Second, read the whole post before you type something. It's an open-source OS - you can host it on your own PC/refrigerator/Raspberry PI for free.
@Capulous@bee_fumo None of this would exist if they didn't choose licensing over ownership.
Is licensing worse than ownership? Yes, much worse.
Is it worth not having licensing to have all of these open-source possibilities, flexibility and availability? Yes, it is.
@paulswaney3 Paul, you need to know that you're the last boss of fucking idiots and you just need to give up in life, you don't understand even like 0.3% of it.