@MarioNawfal Ha.. as someone who gave up (land) skiing because I couldn’t get the side to side technique down (even on the bunny hill) & was basically a hot mess danger rocket to everyone, this could be helpful 😅💀…
Wrong… this man is a customer who acquired something from Best Buy. If you were right, Best Buy would recognize revenue using shipping point terms.. at the moment they provide the goods to the shipper. They don’t.. because that’s not the contract & you’re wrong.
Per Best Buy’s own 2025 10K (on the SEC website):
“Revenue is recognized when control of the promised goods or services transfers to the customer, in an amount reflecting the consideration expected in exchange.”
Product revenue is recognized when the customer takes physical control (in-store or at home). Delivery fees (if charged) are recognized when delivery is completed. They use delivery information to time this recognition.
If what you’re saying is true, BestBuy is materially misstating their revenue on their financial statements as they actually include delivery/shipping fees charged to customers as part of the transaction price & thus as part of gross revenue… this is because they assume ALL RISK as the principal until the moment the asset is transferred to the customer… they wouldn’t be able to do that if the customer actually took on the risk at the shipping point (as you’re implying here).
I actually worked under the partner who led the Best Buy audit for years until she rolled off just a cpl years ago.. perhaps I’ll text her & say some twitter user says they got it all wrong….. someone should let the SEC know too 🥴.
And to further solidify this point, Bestbuy’s revenue recognition per their 10K is upon transfer to customer or FOB destination.. that means they are liable for the asset (& hold it on their books) until delivery at the customers designated location. I’m guessing the driver likely scanned it as if it reached your home & then kept it.. this allowed Best Buy to deem it as delivered in their system. But that doesn’t negate your point.. the contract is between you & Best Buy.. anything that happens before it reaches your home & in that process is on Best Buy.. even from an accounting perspective 🤓😅.
What’s even more strange is that if this is a “thing”, I’d imagine that there is some form of insurance or clause in the contract between FedEx & Best Buy to make Best Buy whole for instances like this (which in turn would encourage deterrents to this behavior) & thus enabling them to deliver on customer service.. as they should have done here while the law enforcement side played out.
And to further solidify this point, Bestbuy’s revenue recognition per their 10K is upon transfer to customer or FOB destination.. that means they are liable for the asset (& hold it on their books) until delivery at the customers designated location. I’m guessing the driver likely scanned it as if it reached your home & then kept it.. this allowed Best Buy to deem it as delivered in their system. But that doesn’t negate your point.. the contract is between you & Best Buy.. anything that happens before it reaches your home & in that process is on Best Buy.. even from an accounting perspective 🤓😅.
What’s even more strange is that if this is a “thing”, I’d imagine that there is some form of insurance or clause in the contract between FedEx & Best Buy to make Best Buy whole for instances like this (which in turn would encourage deterrents to this behavior) & thus enabling them to deliver on customer service.. as they should have done here while the law enforcement side played out.
Wait… so @Destroyer4547 is a grown ass mam 🙄👵🏼, a grandmother to 6 children, & she mocked a new mother, called an infant child a “mess”, & referred to its presence on this earth as something to be saddled with? My lord… I thought for sure this was some unwed 20 year old who didn’t leave town for college & rage posts her stunted self-centered worldview (we all know the type). A fu€king grandmother?? LMAO.. y’all.. 🥴😳… maybe the AI stock photo didn’t help.
When? When has he talked obsessively about Erika’s daughter other than to state that he doesn’t believe the photo shared by another podcaster was that of her daughter… how in the actual fuck is that worse? Seriously… is the new strategy to just make shit up now? See what sticks? You can not like this guy… but the nonstop lying.. for fucks sake…
Like this one below when she responded to Tony Seruga of all people & tried to act like her credentials were at all relevant to the topic at hand let alone better than Tony’s (who is an expert at geotracking)… she acts like a damn retard, literally, on only one topic & any association thereto. She doesn’t just disagree.. she goes full retard.. there is a difference. Yet on any other topic she’s usually pretty reasoned.. whether you agree or not, there is usually some rationale there.
I didn’t see an explanation… per Grok FWIW 🤷🏼♀️:
“Bottom Line on the Judgment Call
- Tony's experience directly qualifies him to make and defend claims about raw GPS data, foreign-registered devices, and device movement (Utah → Islamabad Serena Hotel). He has done this for clients including the U.S. government.
- Sarah's background gives her credibility on broader intel analysis and terrorism, but not "way more expertise" on adtech, device-level geotracking, or why Tony's methodology would be invalid. Her tone (and the backlash in replies) reads more like gatekeeping than a substantive technical takedown.
- Without seeing Tony's underlying dataset (the image in his post appears to be a supporting visual, but the methodology isn't public here), we can't verify the claim's accuracy. But on expertise alone? Tony is operating well within his lane. Sarah's dismissal doesn't appear grounded in deeper knowledge of this niche.
In short, Tony's track record gives every reason to take his post seriously as coming from a specialist. Sarah's reply doesn't establish superior insight—it's more of a general-intel commentator pushing back on a data-heavy claim outside her primary wheelhouse. If new details emerge about the data sources, that could change the analysis, but the expertise mismatch favors Tony here.”
@MeriwetherFarms Y’all are the reason why I even know what it is.. I began following last year. I’ll never forget the photos of what it does to the cattle.. that wound… I’m sad we are here now..
All of you religious fundamentalists/occultists who believe in a man-driven apocalypse & the summoning of the anti-Christ or Messiah, “end-times” ginger cow nonsense, no matter your chosen flavor of Abrahamic religion, all need to go the fu€k away… shove all of y’all into your own little country to larp out your dooms day fantasies against each other & leave us out of it.
Emily.. Michael danced around the Öztürk matter & your entire statement as if he either didn’t know or didn’t want to breach the actual substance of that incident. Michael does this a lot. Even if a lot of what he says is right. It’s smarmy.. it’s transparent.. he can handle himself, but no one seems to ever want to actually push him on things so he does his own Knowles-esque Kamala word salad. It makes him untrustworthy & thus his poorly presented anti-free speech absolutism argument sounds like a heaping pile of dog shit. Sigh..
@RepThomasMassie@GenXGirl1994 The RJC is heavily funded by the Adelson’s.. the late Mr. Adelson was on the board & Miriam continues to be a primary funder. Go watch her speech at one of their conferences in Sept 2024.
@HaydenJame15136@MattWalshBlog Then explain it to us you decrepit twat.. refute what Matt said with actual words that form a coherent & logical argument. Answer his question.. what is a victory? FFS..
Trump discounted or overrode key elements of his own US Joint Chiefs of Staff & broader Intelligence Community advice on the Iran operation in favor of Netanyahu, Israeli intelligence assessments, & a tight inner circle (of neocons) pushing for decisive action. If you’re going to white knight for this war you love so much, Jim, at least tell the truth & don’t attempt to gaslight us.
You use the term “podcastistan” & think anyone should take you seriously. Your gaslighting won’t make the objective facts disappear, Jimbo.
Trump ignored risk assessments from Joint Chiefs + IC, including warnings on Hormuz, regime resilience, & limited nuclear setback.. these were objective documented inputs.
We all observed Trump’s shifting & weak rationales & multiple layered justifications (“37 years at war,” imminent Israeli strike, quick capitulation, regime change lite) look like post-hoc excuses when initial assumptions didn’t hold... if this were a just war, one that was so clearly beneficial to us, our president wouldn’t have to constantly lie, change his story, & contradict himself.
There is no reconciliation to observable reality… decapitation strikes happened, leadership losses were real, but the regime adapted.. & Hormuz stayed disrupted for months, oil/gas prices spiked & hurt Americans, no total “end” materialized, & there is a reason why our allies didn’t join us. You ignore this.
There is a glaring cost-benefit mismatch.. Trump’s promised America First vs outcomes that imposed domestic inflation pain, ammo depletion, & defense budget ballooning while prioritizing a regional ally’s security perimeter.
Not once in your stupid rant here do you explain how the war in Iran benefited America & Americans on a standalone basis… & how those benefits outweigh the costs.
Because you can’t. Men like you are a blight on this nation & to the American people.. an absolute out-of-touch grease stain.
10 cents! If we had the pre-drink at our house in college, what we took back from the empties ppl left over was used for our drinks the following weekend.
I live in a different state now & I’m in the habit of crushing & recycling.. my mom yells at me all the time when I visit & crush vs putting in the return bin.