@GaryGensler@SECGov Phoque Ewe fageaux. You’re a disgusting representation of the stagnation in American innovations…and I hope someone parks a steamroller on you ya feckin schmuck
If the bill becomes law, any company or individual that provides ANY service whatsoever may be forced to assist in NSA surveillance, as long as they have access to equipment on which communications are transmitted or stored—such as routers, servers, cell towers, etc. 6/25
10X faster and ~$1850 cheaper using @QuickNode vs. @AlchemyPlatform
Tried using both node providers for backfilling transactions receipts which I needed for indexing @base and was pretty shocked at the difference in costs between the two providers
Here's the breakdown:
I need transaction receipts downloaded for every transaction and for every block ~ 12.5M blocks for Base
Unlike e.g. @infura_io both Alchemy and QuickNode have a convenient JSON RPC method for getting all receipts in a block with a single request
Alchemy has "alchemy_getTransactionReceipts"
QuickNode has "eth_getBlockReceipts"
But here's the difference:
Alchemy charges 250 credits for their endpoint while QuickNode only 20 credits
20 * 12.5M = 250M credits meaning you can download all receipts on Base using just the
"Build" plan which is $50
On the other hand, with Alchemy you need to spend 250 * 12.5M = 3.125B credits, which on the Scale plan will cost you $289 (for the first 1.5B credits) + 1625 * $1 (for the other 1.65B credits) - so $1914 total
So what about the speed of downloading?
Alchemy offers a base throughput of 3000 credits / second compared to QuickNode's 2500 credits / second
But because Quicknode's "eth_getBlockReceipts" is only 20 credits - I am getting approx. ~10X higher throughput
I haven't looked into other node providers - but curious to know how other node providers compare
.@SenWarren & @LindseyGrahamSC want a licensing body for tech companies, inspired by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Stopping tech like the NRC stopped nuclear innovation is bad enough. It would also be a censorship weapon!
My @WSJ op ed on the “DCPC”
https://t.co/SVg1X94K2y
It's obvious that there’s a lack of clarity among our regulators regarding crypto, as even the chair of the SEC has declined to say which crypto assets are securities. 3/4 https://t.co/6HZak3dzk9
#Bitcoin won’t hit $1m in 90 days.
But the hyperbitcoinization theory just got a whole lot more attention.
@balajis is using his outlandish bet as a vehicle to perpetuate this narrative. And it’s working.
Powerful strategy.
I just realized that if this had happened a year ago, FTX / Alameda would be purchasing SVB as we speak.
And Gary would be on the horn with banking regulators encouraging them to approve.
America risks losing it's status as a financial hub long term, with no clear regs on crypto, and a hostile environment from regulators.
Congress should act soon to pass clear legislation. Crypto is open to everyone in the world and others are leading. The EU, the UK, and now HK.
1/ We're hearing rumors that the SEC would like to get rid of crypto staking in the U.S. for retail customers. I hope that's not the case as I believe it would be a terrible path for the U.S. if that was allowed to happen.