@allengrussell@365Sports4u@td_nash I'm not knocking Troy. Unlike most Packers fans, I like him. But I also could see worth my eyes that Young, Favre, Marino, Elway, and Moon were better.
@murphy_sea@PJ_Dempz@TwinsAlmanac Don't forget a strike zone that was twice the size, taller stitches on the balls and they constantly threw spitballs or doctored the balls to get more break. There's a reason why they threw primarily breaking balls back then.
@BenIsBack123@ken_manzel@notgaetti The point is, you can't take players from one era and say "but if he played today". If he played today, he works have all the modem advancements of the time. His physical skills are elite. They would be even better had he grown up now.
@Ilovepie31@BenIsBack123@ken_manzel@notgaetti Pitchers back then didn't quiet about velocity. They pitched from a higher mound. Had strike zones that were nestle twice of today's. They doctored the baseballs and the stitches were higher. It was sll about the breaking ball back then.
@3PointStansPod@SwiftyNetwork The entire Bears roster and their entire fan base are cocky. Yet the Bears haven't been relevant since 1985. Explain that to me.......
@Bear_Down_Adam@PackersRunNFC Then you don't know what you're watching. Watch the all 22's. Watch how often he's wide open on a crosser, but he's the 3rd read in the progression. LaFleur is all about distribution. It stunts the offense. Watson and Kraft should be option 1 and 2.
@Bear_Down_Adam@PackersRunNFC Baloney. I know you're a Bears fan, so you don't watch every Packers game. But Watson (when healthy) is a stud. Problem is,LaFleur is all about distribution. It limits the offense.
@TazimWajidWajed I've been saying this for years. Now that Doubs isn't demanding touches, Watson should get the targets he's earned. It's he doesn't, LaFleur is a problem.