This Claude bot on Polymarket made $78,083 in 5 days.
Nobody built it to be smart.
They built it to be fast.
$7 → $3,595
$30 → $11,063
$142 → $13,356
$1,205 → $37,939
I found this wallet three days ago.
𝑵𝒐𝒕𝒆: 𝒀𝒐𝒖 𝒎𝒖𝒔𝒕 𝒃𝒆 𝒇𝒐𝒍𝒍𝒐𝒘𝒊𝒏𝒈 @ai_uncovered 𝒕𝒐 𝒓𝒆𝒄𝒆𝒊𝒗𝒆 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒈𝒖𝒊𝒅𝒆.
Spent 48 hours reverse engineering every trade.
Same markets.
Same logic.
Over and over.
Watch BTC price.
Compare to Polymarket odds.
Enter when they don’t match.
Exit when they do.
While you were analyzing charts — this bot was already in and out.
While you were deciding — it was compounding.
While you were sleeping — it was printing.
Most traders try to be right.
This bot just tries to be faster.
$78,000 in 5 days.
Just Claude. Running a loop.
I don’t know who built this.
But I know how they did it.
And it’s all in the article below.
Giving This Free for 24 hours.
To get it:
1. Comment the word '' Code''
2. Like and Retweet this post
3. Follow me @ai_uncovered (so I can send it via DM)
@FareaNFts Brother u indian? ...me also..not millionaire but trying to learn more.. believe that knowledge is the most precious asset..lots of love brother
Very good overview of the @zama auction! At 45min in the video. Im really impressed at how well @RyanSAdams and @TrustlessState explain things. It's a real skill.
Beanie Explains part 1
everyone is talking about zk and fhe right now
but honestly… most of the content on the timeline is either AI-generated noise
or people put fhe and zk in the same box because both deal with privacy but they actually solve completely different problems
before we go deeper into @zama
let’s fix the basics
wtf is zk? wtf is fhe?
and why they are nothing alike
let’s actually explain it >>>
▫️zk = prove something without revealing it
▫️fhe = compute on something without seeing it
1) zk the “trust me, I can prove it without showing anything” trick
zero-knowledge proofs let you prove something is true without revealing the underlying data
examples:
▫️ prove you're 18+ without revealing your actual birthday
▫️ it’s like walking into a club saying
i won’t show my ID, but i promise i’m old enough
and somehow the bouncer says “fair enough, proof accepted”
basic idea:
zk = verification without exposure
but the computation itself isn’t private ....only the proof is
zk is great for:
▫️ rollups
▫️ private payments
▫️ proving off-chain logic
but zk does NOT give private smart contracts
it only proves correctness
2) fhe the “i don’t know your data but i can still compute it” magic
fully homomorphic encryption lets you compute on encrypted data
inputs, state, and outputs all remain encrypted the whole time
examples:
▫️ someone hands you a locked lunchbox and says-
“mix what’s inside, don’t open it, don’t look at it”
you follow the instructions
the box stays locked
the result is still correct
▫️ a calculator that hides every number you type
but still gives the right answer
that’s fhe
computation without exposure
nobody ..not even the blockchain .. sees plaintext
this is what powers zama’s FHEVM
it feels like ethereum
but completely private
3) the difference in one line
zk: “i know the data, and here’s proof i didn’t cheat”
fhe: “i never saw the data, but i can still compute the answer”
if you mix these two in your posts
you’re spreading confusion
not information
-------------------------------------------------------------------
bottom line
zk = proves correctness
fhe = executes privately
both matter
but they solve different problems
and only fhe enables fully private smart contracts end-to-end
more fundamentals tomorrow,stay tuned.
DON'T HESISTATE TO ASK DOUBTS IN THE COMMS
@zama
#ZamaCreatorProgram